On 19/02/2010 9:41 PM, bpuharic wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/bu...nhardt.html?hp

Just look at the outside evaluations of the stimulus. Perhaps the
best-known economic research firms are IHS Global Insight,
Macroeconomic Advisers and Moody’s Economy.com. They all estimate that
the bill has added 1.6 million to 1.8 million jobs so far and that its
ultimate impact will be roughly 2.5 million jobs. The Congressional
Budget Office, an independent agency, considers these estimates to be
conservative.

------------

this is after the recent USAtoday interview of 50 economists, where
the median estimate of job creation was about 1.5M jobs

seems everyone knows the stimulus is working

except the right wing

Even if it were say 2 million jobs, that is about $1 million per job on
a $2 trillion debt-spending spree.

Like usually, not very cost effective no mater how you look at it.

But if they balanced the governemnts pending, and say eliminated 50% or
more of fedeal income tax, bet the jobs would be created coat to coast
was the people would actually keep more of their own money and it will
not "disappear" or be skimmed by the government.

On a dollar cost basis, at best Obamanomics is a dismal monumentus failure.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 19/02/2010 9:41 PM, bpuharic wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/bu...nhardt.html?hp

Just look at the outside evaluations of the stimulus. Perhaps the
best-known economic research firms are IHS Global Insight,
Macroeconomic Advisers and Moody’s Economy.com. They all estimate that
the bill has added 1.6 million to 1.8 million jobs so far and that its
ultimate impact will be roughly 2.5 million jobs. The Congressional
Budget Office, an independent agency, considers these estimates to be
conservative.

------------

this is after the recent USAtoday interview of 50 economists, where
the median estimate of job creation was about 1.5M jobs

seems everyone knows the stimulus is working

except the right wing

Even if it were say 2 million jobs, that is about $1 million per job on a
$2 trillion debt-spending spree.

Like usually, not very cost effective no mater how you look at it.

But if they balanced the governemnts pending, and say eliminated 50% or
more of fedeal income tax, bet the jobs would be created coat to coast was
the people would actually keep more of their own money and it will not
"disappear" or be skimmed by the government.

On a dollar cost basis, at best Obamanomics is a dismal monumentus
failure.


Fortunately for you, it doesn't matter, since you're not an American and you
hate our country.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 20/02/2010 11:23 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 19/02/2010 9:41 PM, bpuharic wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/bu...nhardt.html?hp

Just look at the outside evaluations of the stimulus. Perhaps the
best-known economic research firms are IHS Global Insight,
Macroeconomic Advisers and Moody’s Economy.com. They all estimate that
the bill has added 1.6 million to 1.8 million jobs so far and that its
ultimate impact will be roughly 2.5 million jobs. The Congressional
Budget Office, an independent agency, considers these estimates to be
conservative.

------------

this is after the recent USAtoday interview of 50 economists, where
the median estimate of job creation was about 1.5M jobs

seems everyone knows the stimulus is working

except the right wing

Even if it were say 2 million jobs, that is about $1 million per job on a
$2 trillion debt-spending spree.

Like usually, not very cost effective no mater how you look at it.

But if they balanced the governemnts pending, and say eliminated 50% or
more of fedeal income tax, bet the jobs would be created coat to coast was
the people would actually keep more of their own money and it will not
"disappear" or be skimmed by the government.

On a dollar cost basis, at best Obamanomics is a dismal monumentus
failure.


Fortunately for you, it doesn't matter, since you're not an American and you
hate our country.

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

On 20/02/2010 1:23 PM, your kind of guy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

Guess you are just another liberal.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 20/02/2010 11:23 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 19/02/2010 9:41 PM, bpuharic wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/bu...nhardt.html?hp

Just look at the outside evaluations of the stimulus. Perhaps the
best-known economic research firms are IHS Global Insight,
Macroeconomic Advisers and Moody’s Economy.com. They all estimate that
the bill has added 1.6 million to 1.8 million jobs so far and that its
ultimate impact will be roughly 2.5 million jobs. The Congressional
Budget Office, an independent agency, considers these estimates to be
conservative.

------------

this is after the recent USAtoday interview of 50 economists, where
the median estimate of job creation was about 1.5M jobs

seems everyone knows the stimulus is working

except the right wing

Even if it were say 2 million jobs, that is about $1 million per job on
a
$2 trillion debt-spending spree.

Like usually, not very cost effective no mater how you look at it.

But if they balanced the governemnts pending, and say eliminated 50% or
more of fedeal income tax, bet the jobs would be created coat to coast
was
the people would actually keep more of their own money and it will not
"disappear" or be skimmed by the government.

On a dollar cost basis, at best Obamanomics is a dismal monumentus
failure.


Fortunately for you, it doesn't matter, since you're not an American and
you
hate our country.

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.


I think you should move to Russia.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 20/02/2010 1:23 PM, your kind of guy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

And I dispute the numbers, those were those eligible for "bailouts", not
the real raw numbers....

LMAO, just anotehr sucker going for the Pied Piper bait.

In article , says...

On 20/02/2010 1:23 PM, your kind ofLo guy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

Guess you are just another liberal.

Looks like Harry hasn't stopped his spoofing ****...

--
Can I haz Cheezeburger?

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:00:08 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 20/02/2010 1:23 PM, your kind of guy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

Guess you are just another liberal.

If the US goes belly up so goes the world. Preach your bullship all you
want. We all see your agenda.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:41:09 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article , says...

On 20/02/2010 1:23 PM, your kind ofLo guy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:09:20 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

Unfortunately Caanda is in lock step with the US.... this bailout horse
**** is going to drag Canada right into it. We are already taxed up the
ass and can't afford the GM, Chrysler and bank screw over.

Tough ****. Maybe Obama has some friendly advice for a toilet cleaner such
as yourself.

Guess you are just another liberal.

Looks like Harry hasn't stopped his spoofing ****...
You are too stupid to know crap about crap. Go play "two stroke".