On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:16:26 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/06/2011 3:41 PM, wf3h wrote:

and the right wing tells us how WONDERFUL this is...the rich are
getting richer...the middle class, worthless scum that they are, are
paying for it.

as god intended.

As for debt spend, Obama has already added much more debt than Bush did
in 8 years, problem is Obama isn't even through his first, and hopefully
last term.

really? proof?

oh. none. but he's black...

So tell us fleabagger, is that the reason or the excuse? Are you
suggesting blacks don't pay their debts because they are black?

you tell me, kluxer


My, you are racist.

yeah you rabid racists generally say that anyone who isnt pro white is
a racist

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:00:35 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/06/2011 6:18 PM, wf3h wrote:
while the ku klux clowns are blaming obama for bush's turning the
economy over to the chinese, let's look at the effects of 10 years of
bush tax cuts


----------

and the right wing tells us how WONDERFUL this is...the rich are
getting richer...the middle class, worthless scum that they are, are
paying for it.

as god intended.

Do the math fleabagger. Oh wait, I forgot, fleabaggers are mentally
challenged so lets summarize it.

says the guy who thinks obama was pres in 2001


Now 0.1% is 1:1000. Only about 100M taxpayers. That means the claim is
100,000 people make over $3M/year. First, I seriously question that
number as being far too high, but lets go with it.

100,000 * .5M is only $50B so.... with a $1600B overspend, where do you
suggest the other $1550B comes from?

hey you tell me. you guys cut taxes on the 0.1% and let the normal
working people die on the vine

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:44:58 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 201

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

no one cares what she says. what matters is actiong

and the GOP is destroying america

i have the facts

-tax cut in 2001
-tax cut in 2003
-CSE's that bankrupted the economy

those are actions

they were done by the right wing.

so i have facts

you have fairy tales

I have Pelosi tieing up the congress for two years with gutless
investigations against Scooter Libby while doing everything she could to
raise the price of oil and destroy the economy..

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:46:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 6:44 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

Good part is Obama's way is going to screw the fleabaggers more. Heck,
even a poor person surviving on only SS gets the gas price hike in gas,
food, even rent as the owner will want more as will the city
tax/utilities. Less of their incomes are discretionary to compensate
for the price hikes. Nice kick of inflation onto the fixed incomes and
low incomes.

let's see...gas approached 4 under bush

guess that was obama's fault, too.


But that is what this is about. Does big fat statism sized behemoth
government take the hit? Or pass the hit to the people in
hyper-inflation and a lower standard of living?

The more the government gets, the less the people get.

except the govt never stole 10 trillion in 1 year like wall street did

and the right loves it


Flea baggers are just too dumbsh1t stupid to see it.

It went up, and if you blame Bush for that, you have to credit him for
bringing it back down. This clown won't get it back down, thank God he
will be gone in the next election...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/06/2011 3:38 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:


It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

But the democrats beat the GOP to it, at $14.5 trillion, me thinks
unless something very radical changes, count US DC bankrupt and in
spiral debt.


and this is more right wing bull****

14.5 trillion where? how?

oh. you just heard it somewhere.

lemme know when you get some facts, OK?

Open a newspaper... the debt is 14.5 T... Duh...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:37:30 -0400, wrote:


but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

In this case it was. If Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire, all
he had to do was to veto the extension bill.

There was not a veto proof support for the extension

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

The problem is liars like yourself who blame Bush for laws the
democratic house and senate wrote and passed, while now that Obama is in
office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate
or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your
hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:11:34 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

no one cares what she says. what matters is actiong

and the GOP is destroying america

i have the facts

-tax cut in 2001
-tax cut in 2003
-CSE's that bankrupted the economy

those are actions

they were done by the right wing.

so i have facts

you have fairy tales

I have Pelosi tieing up the congress for two years with gutless
investigations against Scooter Libby while doing everything she could to
raise the price of oil and destroy the economy..

let's see...a record number of filibusters used by the GOP

the even rejected, for head of the chicago federal reserve

a nobel prize winning economist

that's what the right is doing to the US

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:17:26 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:36:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/06/2011 3:38 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:


It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

But the democrats beat the GOP to it, at $14.5 trillion, me thinks
unless something very radical changes, count US DC bankrupt and in
spiral debt.


and this is more right wing bull****

14.5 trillion where? how?

oh. you just heard it somewhere.

lemme know when you get some facts, OK?

Open a newspaper... the debt is 14.5 T... Duh...


gee. and almost none of this is due to obama

but he's black, you see....

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:11:18 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:56:16 -0400, wf3h wrote:

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

Actually if you consider the GOP to be "Wall Street", they have
controlled the White House ever since 1981. Who wasn't a Wall street
guy since then? Reagan was probably the least affected by the Wall
street people of the whole bunch.
Bush Clinton Bush & Obama all had the revolving door financial team
from Wall Street to the government and back to Wall Street, rinse
repeat.

agreed. the right has engineered the US political process so it's the
best money can buy

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:20:37 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

The problem is liars like yourself who blame Bush for laws the
democratic house and senate wrote and passed,

hmmm...tax cuts for the rich in 2001 and 2003

the GOP controlled the congress and the presidency

t
while now that Obama is in
office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate
or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your
hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause...

you know zip about contemporary affairs