On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:40:36 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 10:04 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:52:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...


hmmm...tax cuts for the rich in 2001 and 2003

the GOP controlled the congress and the presidency

t
while now that Obama is in
office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate
or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your
hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause...

you know zip about contemporary affairs

And you could care less about truth, just talking points...

and you dont even care about the truth

Tosk is right. Your argument is basted on bu11sh1t and fiction. Fact
is, the bubble has burst and fleabaggers fear what needs to be done to
fix it.'

gee. all you have to do is prove me wrong

go ahead. i'll wait


A massive downsize of government for starters. 50% reduction in size
minimum. The footprint of current government is far too big to support
by the society. Now it can either do it voluntarily and save a lot of
grief, or it can be forced.

meaningless.

and, of course, your method was tried

it was called the depression of 29

ever hear of it??

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:34:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 7:59 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600,
wrote:

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

Actually yes. Study the elasticity in pricing, taxes too have
elasticity. Too low or too high and the benefits to society diminish.
Trouble now is that it is too high. Look at any nation having trouble,
some toxic mix of debt and taxes is the issue. Look at any economy
doing well, debt and taxes are much much less.


HAHAHAHAH american taxes are teh lowest they've been in FOURTY YEARS!!

he doesnt even know what the tax rate is in the US!

That is the growing economies of the world have less debt and less taxes.

more reader's digest bull****

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:52:55 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 10/06/2011 12:22 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:13:37 -0400, wrote:


ummm...if they're insignifican

why does ALL GOP policy focus on cutting their taxes?

if the amount is so small, why does the GOP refuse to cut taxes unless
they're rincluded??

They are idiots too.


We really needed Obama to veto the whole renewal bill

And the result would have been even more pain for people least able to
handle it.

Actually true. As Mr Rich might move the business elsewhere and the
people who need to work get unemployed.

great. THIS is the economy with the rich running it.

let 'em go and let the middle class reclaim america


I have never hidden why I left USA in 2004, it was economical to do so.
And I was right...

and you went to canada

socialized medicine

more bank regulations than the US

golly.

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:54:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 10:06 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:13:37 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:53:16 -

sure is. healthcare for the middle class...financial regulation...as
much as the GOP will let him get

obama proposed a tax cut ONLY for those making less than 250K


The $250k and above tax may be nice symbolism but it is insignificant.

gee. then why does the GOP say only THEY can drive the economy and
only THEY deserve a tax cut?

Roman empire fell when they targeted the rich. Smart ones left, the
others perished and good time were over for everyone.

HAHAHAHA

the rich owned egypt

how'd that work out?

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:03:12 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 8:03 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:00:35 -0600,
wrote:


Now 0.1% is 1:1000. Only about 100M taxpayers. That means the claim is
100,000 people make over $3M/year. First, I seriously question that
number as being far too high, but lets go with it.

100,000 * .5M is only $50B so.... with a $1600B overspend, where do you
suggest the other $1550B comes from?

hey you tell me. you guys cut taxes on the 0.1% and let the normal
working people die on the vine

Hey, you vote for debt, statism and more debt, you have to take what
comes along with it. No road paved with debt comes wealth.

never voted for bush, his last budget was 1.2 TRILLION in debt


No nation or individual before has succeeded with more debt. Not a one.
What makes you fleabaggers think your exempt from reality?

wrong. the US debt at the end of WW2 was higher, as a percentage of
GDP, than it is now

right wing liar bull****ter

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:02:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:51:20 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


a nobel prize winning economist

that's what the right is doing to the US

Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them...

yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed

good move.

never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the
country

You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me?
About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back
in '75...

let's see....which university has the most nobels in economics?

oh....the right wing u. of chicago.

milton friedman

the chicago school

but you're right wing so dont even know your own histor
ry

So, are you suggesting that because it was a great honor years ago, that
it couldn't have changed to something else lately? That's either short
sighted, or dishonest.. Oh wait, don't tell me....

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:14:52 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


a nobel prize winning economist

that's what the right is doing to the US

Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them...

yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed

good move.

never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the
country

You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me?
About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back
in '75...

Obama's nobel prize was a flipping joke.


HAHAHAHAAH he doesn't know the difference between the nobel for
ECONOMICS and PEACE!!!

Ha, hahahahahaha, who ****ing cares.. You still have a joke prize given
to a joke president...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:15:04 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:30:30 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, all ths Obama debt spend has to be paid for somehow.

let's see...the largest components of the deficit are

1. the bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003
2. the trillion dollar iraq war

obama had nothing to do with either

but, of course, the kluxer blames the black guy


Unless of course he is going to declare the USA bankrupt and eat the
heat that the USA is a failed world currency do to US-Euro banking
corruption. Euro is probably walking dead, we will see, Greece looks
like it is going to welsh big. Iceland is watching people trying to
emigrate after their welshing.

hell why not blame obama for them, too?

You keep deflecting with your red herring "race"... It's nothing to do
with Obama, it's Pelosi and Reid who refused to allow anything to happen
during Bush,

HAHAAHAHHA let's see..i notice you said NOTHING about points 1 and 2
above. you IGNORED them

and that's why you're a racist



and declared themselves "the do nothing Congress" when
Obama took over. They have lived up to their self made reputation by
doing nothing about jobs, economy, foreign relations, or anything else
concerning a budget since they took over congress during the Bush
admin.. Now the republicans have one house, barely, and you expect them
to fix it when the Obama admin has openly shut them out... stupid...


uh...which house passes the budget??

oh. the representatives

controlled by the GOP

how they doing? what cuts have they made?

oh. none.

You make no sense...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:10:33 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 11/06/2011 3:46 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...


hell why not blame obama for them, too?

Obama's policies would continues the destructive behavior.

But Obama out spent Bush in about a year. Almost 8 times faster.

proof?

oh. none.

another right wing lie

Just because you refuse to look at the figures, well, except the ones
the Huffignton Hoax posts, is not our fault...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 6/11/11 9:01 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:02:10 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:51:20 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...


a nobel prize winning economist

that's what the right is doing to the US

Trying to slow down Obama and Reid, good for them...

yeah. by eliminating nobel prize winners on the fed

good move.

never let it be said the GOP ever tried to do what's right for the
country

You keep bringing up the Nobel prize, is that supposed to impress me?
About as much as the crown on the head of the king of the Jr. Prom back
in '75...

let's see....which university has the most nobels in economics?

oh....the right wing u. of chicago.

milton friedman

the chicago school

but you're right wing so dont even know your own histor
ry

So, are you suggesting that because it was a great honor years ago, that
it couldn't have changed to something else lately? That's either short
sighted, or dishonest.. Oh wait, don't tell me....


It's the height of irony when the dumbest, least educated poster in
rec.boats passes judgment on Nobel laureates.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing