On 6/9/11 8:44 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:27:51 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wrote:


well no. the budget is the function of the house and it was not
filibuster proof

but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

and i notice you said zip about the 30 year history of the rape of the
US by your friends

You keep spewing this crap, hoping somebody will be dumb enough to
believe it.

gee. alli have is evidence. you? you have your reader's digest stories
and myths

The fact is, for the last 40 years the democrats have either
been in control of two or all three (house, senate, whitehouse) more
than the republicans with times of all three when the republicans have
not had that advantage at all. You really need to read up on some simple
history before you blame the consistently minority party...

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

how's tthat working out for us? we doing OK? the fact is, the GOP
hates america. and i suggest you read up on how often the GOP votes
the party line vs the dems who split their loyalty.

you're right wing which means you believe in fairy tales

You are the one spewing lobsta boats...


Asshole, I sold the Lobster Boat, I now own a 42' Sport-fisherman. So
when you are out on your clapped out row boat, think of me in my a/c yacht.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On 08/06/2011 6:56 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:27:51 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wrote:


well no. the budget is the function of the house and it was not
filibuster proof

but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

and i notice you said zip about the 30 year history of the rape of the
US by your friends

You keep spewing this crap, hoping somebody will be dumb enough to
believe it.

gee. alli have is evidence. you? you have your reader's digest stories
and myths

The fact is, for the last 40 years the democrats have either
been in control of two or all three (house, senate, whitehouse) more
than the republicans with times of all three when the republicans have
not had that advantage at all. You really need to read up on some simple
history before you blame the consistently minority party...

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

how's tthat working out for us? we doing OK? the fact is, the GOP
hates america. and i suggest you read up on how often the GOP votes
the party line vs the dems who split their loyalty.

you're right wing which means you believe in fairy tales

Funny, your poor, envious, destitute, greed and stupid sheep.

Who really has the problem?
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:11:18 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:56:16 -0400, wf3h wrote:

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

Actually if you consider the GOP to be "Wall Street", they have
controlled the White House ever since 1981. Who wasn't a Wall street
guy since then? Reagan was probably the least affected by the Wall
street people of the whole bunch.
Bush Clinton Bush & Obama all had the revolving door financial team
from Wall Street to the government and back to Wall Street, rinse
repeat.

agreed. the right has engineered the US political process so it's the
best money can buy

On 6/10/2011 2:03 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:00:03 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:11:18 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:56:16 -0400, wrote:

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

Actually if you consider the GOP to be "Wall Street", they have
controlled the White House ever since 1981. Who wasn't a Wall street
guy since then? Reagan was probably the least affected by the Wall
street people of the whole bunch.
Bush Clinton Bush& Obama all had the revolving door financial team
from Wall Street to the government and back to Wall Street, rinse
repeat.

agreed. the right has engineered the US political process so it's the
best money can buy

As long as you believe the democratic leadership is also "right wing"
we agree.
There are still a half dozen wall street insiders advising Obama

Crooks and tax evaders too. He really knows how to pick em.

On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:03:41 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:00:03 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:11:18 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:56:16 -0400, wf3h wrote:

really? let's see...since 1980, the GOP controlled the presidency for
22 years.

Actually if you consider the GOP to be "Wall Street", they have
controlled the White House ever since 1981. Who wasn't a Wall street
guy since then? Reagan was probably the least affected by the Wall
street people of the whole bunch.
Bush Clinton Bush & Obama all had the revolving door financial team
from Wall Street to the government and back to Wall Street, rinse
repeat.

agreed. the right has engineered the US political process so it's the
best money can buy

As long as you believe the democratic leadership is also "right wing"
we agree.
There are still a half dozen wall street insiders advising Obama

let's see...which SCOTUS judges said OK in the 'citizens united'
decision?

oh...all...ALL of the conservative ones.

On 09/06/2011 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:37:30 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wrote:

Between 2001 and 2010, the Bush tax cuts added $2.6 trillion to the
public debt, 50 percent of the total debt accrued during that time.
Over the past 10 years, the country has spent more than $400 billion
just servicing the debt created by the cuts.

Obama has been in office over 2 years and he had a filibuster proof
senate along with the house for several months.

well no. the budget is the function of the house and it was not
filibuster proof

There is no filibuster in the house, the majority rules and there are
time limits on all debates.
The dems had the majority in the house.

but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

In this case it was. If Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire, all
he had to do was to veto the extension bill.

There was not a veto proof support for the extension

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:37:30 -0400, wrote:


but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

In this case it was. If Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire, all
he had to do was to veto the extension bill.

There was not a veto proof support for the extension

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:37:30 -0400, wrote:


but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

In this case it was. If Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire, all
he had to do was to veto the extension bill.

There was not a veto proof support for the extension

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

The problem is liars like yourself who blame Bush for laws the
democratic house and senate wrote and passed, while now that Obama is in
office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate
or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your
hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 22:20:37 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

The problem is liars like yourself who blame Bush for laws the
democratic house and senate wrote and passed,

hmmm...tax cuts for the rich in 2001 and 2003

the GOP controlled the congress and the presidency

t
while now that Obama is in
office, it's the House of Reps, with it's minor majority and no Senate
or Oval office behind them that's responsible.. You are a dip****, your
hypocrisy is only surpassed by the likes of John and Harry Krause...

you know zip about contemporary affairs

On 09/06/2011 7:59 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:46:02 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 10:36 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:37:30 -0400, wrote:


but, then, you simply say it's the black guy's fault

In this case it was. If Obama wanted the Bush tax cuts to expire, all
he had to do was to veto the extension bill.

There was not a veto proof support for the extension

These are now the Obama tax cuts.

Besides, the amounts were talking about, would be like using tooth picks
to save the titanic after its side was riped open. The cuts are not
that much in the $1.6 trillion, $2 trillion US Fed level corruption spend.

The real problem is that DC is living well beyond its means, sort of
like having an income of $10K/mo but spending $25K/mo. Will not last
long before real trouble starts, and in fact it already has. USD has
lost 30% value in just 4 years against the Yuan.

the real problem is that the right believes supply side mythology so
insists you can cut taxes and balance the budget

Actually yes. Study the elasticity in pricing, taxes too have
elasticity. Too low or too high and the benefits to society diminish.
Trouble now is that it is too high. Look at any nation having trouble,
some toxic mix of debt and taxes is the issue. Look at any economy
doing well, debt and taxes are much much less.

That is the growing economies of the world have less debt and less taxes.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.