Harryk wrote:
On 6/5/11 3:43 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:35:01 -0400, John
wrote:

And that is the only answer you can give, which takes no intellect.
But that's not bad for a brainless twit. It's not very credible
though.

She/it sure proves a point easily.

John, do yourself a favor and stop feeding the troll.


Herring is the troll here.

Sure, WAFA. Keep telling yourself that while you post the same
left-wing BS day after day.

On Jun 5, 7:35*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 6/5/11 3:43 PM, wrote:

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:35:01 -0400, John
wrote:

And that is the only answer you can give, *which takes no intellect..
But that's not bad for a brainless twit. It's not very credible though.

She/it sure proves a point easily.

John, do yourself a favor and stop feeding the troll.

Herring is the troll here.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

Pot-kettle-black

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:35:01 -0400, John H
wrote:

And that is the only answer you can give, which takes no intellect.
But that's not bad for a brainless twit. It's not very credible though.

She/it sure proves a point easily.

John, do yourself a favor and stop feeding the troll.

But, but, but... John is holier than thou!!!

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

TopBassDog wrote:
On Jun 5, 12:02 pm, wrote:

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:32:36 -0400, John
wrote:


... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).


What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?


Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?


I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

The "liberal" answer is that you're a racist/moron.

And that is the only answer you can give, which takes no intellect.
But that's not bad for a brainless twit. It's not very credible though.

Why hasn't she left for the "boating" group??

On 05/06/2011 7:32 AM, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

Obama is a corrupt hypocritical idiot treating Americans and others as
if they are stupid. Many are.

Libya is about getting Libyan oil cheap, 144 tons of gold, central bank
not in debt and under IMF extortion and organizing a united African
states. Not any good for US-Euro colonial/corporate interests.

Normally a country can be kept in line with the UN-IMF regime, but Libya
government and banks have almost zero debt. Debt is a form of slavery.

I get a kick out of media manipulation, put a English placard about
"democracy" to get a western public buy in. Hell, most of their people
can't read English let alone comprehend democracy. Islam does not have
democracy.

What it is about are criminals, lots of young males, unemployed or so
poor that $10 rise in groceries a month hurts in hunger. No woman wants
them, they have nothing to offer. All they have is their lives, hungry
mouth and lots of rage. Join up with al Queda, Muslim Brotherhood and
organize the violence. Most want a united Islam in the hopes they get a
bigger piece of the pie.

Egypt went from a democracy to a military dictatorship and Obama helped
it along. Go figure, Obama helped destroy a democracy.

When NATO tried to assassinate Gaddafi, and it went wrong killing
children in their own home Obama knew he had to pull a rabbit out of the
hat to stem the growing anti-assassination sediment. Knowing where
Osama was, and worried others might disclose Obama knowing where Osama
was and doing nothing, the time to sacrifice Osama came. Yep, getting
Osama was a political practicality, as if a GOP stood up in Congress it
could have looked pretty bad for Obama.

My guess is Gaddafi told westerners and Saudi to screw off, thus making
this a political vendetta. Kaddafi was no angel, but our governments
quite happily dealt with him for decades...

This isn't unrelated to Gbagbo of Ivory Coast. Not at all, Gbagbo and
Gaddafi wanted an African unification and labour standards etc. Gbagbo
was not a UN puppet, so the UN financially and with arms backed a Muslim
rebellion with their puppet boy.

In the end there is a top level power struggle going on. And meda is
being used to con people. Our leaders are being dishonest as to the
real reasons why Libya matters, Bahrain, Yemen, Syria, Jordan, and
dozens of other countries don't mater, yet.

The NATO-US-Euro Regime marches on. Just like Nazi Germany, one country
at a time.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:31:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 05/06/2011 7:32 AM, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

Obama is a corrupt hypocritical idiot treating Americans and others as
if they are stupid. Many are.

when did you first start confusing obama with bush?

Libya is about getting Libyan oil cheap,

uh...the US doesnt buy libyan oil.


Normally a country can be kept in line with the UN-IMF regime, but Libya
government and banks have almost zero debt. Debt is a form of slavery.

which is why wall street just imposed the largest debt on the american
middle class since 29

and the right wing supports this


Egypt went from a democracy to a military dictatorship and Obama helped
it along. Go figure, Obama helped destroy a democracy.

HAHAHAHAHA gee and what did bush do about egyptian democracy??

NOTHING!!


When NATO tried to assassinate Gaddafi, and it went wrong killing
children in their own home Obama knew he had to pull a rabbit out of the
hat to stem the growing anti-assassination sediment. Knowing where
Osama was, and worried others might disclose Obama knowing where Osama
was and doing nothing, the time to sacrifice Osama came. Yep, getting
Osama was a political practicality, as if a GOP stood up in Congress it
could have looked pretty bad for Obama.

anybody know what this kluxer is babbling about? next thing he'll be
telling us obama is an alien from a UFO


This isn't unrelated to Gbagbo of Ivory Coast. Not at all, Gbagbo and
Gaddafi wanted an African unification and labour standards etc. Gbagbo
was not a UN puppet, so the UN financially and with arms backed a Muslim
rebellion with their puppet boy.

other than the fact he lost a fair election

so canuck is FOR egyptian democracy and AGAINST ivory coast democracy

gee. what logic.


The NATO-US-Euro Regime marches on. Just like Nazi Germany, one country
at a time.

PPPHWWWEETT!!

GODWIN'S LAW VIOLATION!!

On 07/06/2011 6:09 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:31:50 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/06/2011 7:32 AM, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

Obama is a corrupt hypocritical idiot treating Americans and others as
if they are stupid. Many are.

when did you first start confusing obama with bush?

Libya is about getting Libyan oil cheap,

uh...the US doesnt buy libyan oil.

Doesn't have to. Europe now competes to get oil that might have been
sold to the US. Russia sells much of its directly to China.

Normally a country can be kept in line with the UN-IMF regime, but Libya
government and banks have almost zero debt. Debt is a form of slavery.

which is why wall street just imposed the largest debt on the american
middle class since 29

Wall street didn't, corrupt politicians did. Look at who signed the
bailout checks. Bush and Obama with Congressional/Senate approval by
silence.

By rights, democratic congress should have hauled Bush on the carpet for
using TARP for GM's first $13 billion to keep them going for Obama big
bailout spender.

and the right wing supports this

Then it was a democratic congress. And Bush/Obama both partake.

Politicians could have just called it what is was, corruption.

Egypt went from a democracy to a military dictatorship and Obama helped
it along. Go figure, Obama helped destroy a democracy.

HAHAHAHAHA gee and what did bush do about egyptian democracy??

NOTHING!!

Opened up his mouth and talked Mubarak out of office with IMF and
UN-diplomatic extortions. look at IMF as the NWO economic extortion arm
of the UN-Euro-US regime.

Which is why IMF could not control Libya -- Libay has inconsequential
near zero debt. Revoking credit on someone who does not need credit
isn't going to work, so use NATO to bomb them.

When NATO tried to assassinate Gaddafi, and it went wrong killing
children in their own home Obama knew he had to pull a rabbit out of the
hat to stem the growing anti-assassination sediment. Knowing where
Osama was, and worried others might disclose Obama knowing where Osama
was and doing nothing, the time to sacrifice Osama came. Yep, getting
Osama was a political practicality, as if a GOP stood up in Congress it
could have looked pretty bad for Obama.

anybody know what this kluxer is babbling about? next thing he'll be
telling us obama is an alien from a UFO

So are you stating race is the reason or the excuse?

This isn't unrelated to Gbagbo of Ivory Coast. Not at all, Gbagbo and
Gaddafi wanted an African unification and labour standards etc. Gbagbo
was not a UN puppet, so the UN financially and with arms backed a Muslim
rebellion with their puppet boy.

other than the fact he lost a fair election

Fair? UN armed and economically supported the rebels. Follow up, media
is censoring the murders and 1000's leaving. Might even get ugly like
Rwanda. Don't trust Anderson 360 for news, BBC is much less Obama
regime orientated. Anderson and most of the major US media are regime
puppets. To scared to report the whole story, just feed the sheep
propaganda.

so canuck is FOR egyptian democracy and AGAINST ivory coast democracy

gee. what logic.

Depends how it is done. US-UN-Euro regime interference out, I am all
for it. But funding rebels, then parachuting ina UN-IMF leader with
money does not make a fair election. Plus add in over a million Quattro
friendly illegal immigrant Muslims - hardly fair.

Egypt was a democracy, and Mubarak was elected. Facts not put on
American media were than even if small, Mubarak had more popular support
the day before he left than did Obama. Does American media put the
protests on in Egypt that are protesting the new military dictatorship
now Muslim Brotherhood controlled?

Almost seems if you have Muslim Brotherhood you have Obama on your side.
They are also the Syrian protesters.

Shake the lice out of the cranial cavity. Obama foreign relations is a
cluster f--k.

The NATO-US-Euro Regime marches on. Just like Nazi Germany, one country
at a time.

PPPHWWWEETT!!

GODWIN'S LAW VIOLATION!!

Not much different in WW II Germany invading Austria than NATO going to
Libya. Libya didn't provoke it this time. US-UN Regime did.

My guess is Kaddafi had the guts to tell Obama and UN NWO to shove it
where the sun don't shine. Taht is why hey want him dead, vengeance.

The only reason Obama got Osama, is it became politically convenient to
do. Botching the assassination attempt on Kaddafi blowing up a home
with 3 unarmed innocent uninvolved children in it, Obama needed to stop
the horror factor of US child killing, get Osama....

Plus, I am sure Obama would not like it if a GOP stood up in Congress
and asked Obama, if you have known where Osama is, why is it taking 8
months to get him? Hearing that from a GOP has obvious political risks.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:17:05 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/06/2011 6:09 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:31:50 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/06/2011 7:32 AM, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

Obama is a corrupt hypocritical idiot treating Americans and others as
if they are stupid. Many are.

when did you first start confusing obama with bush?

Libya is about getting Libyan oil cheap,

uh...the US doesnt buy libyan oil.

Doesn't have to. Europe now competes to get oil that might have been
sold to the US. Russia sells much of its directly to China.

so you were wrong when you said the US was in this for libyan oil?

thanks. i already knew that.


Normally a country can be kept in line with the UN-IMF regime, but Libya
government and banks have almost zero debt. Debt is a form of slavery.

which is why wall street just imposed the largest debt on the american
middle class since 29

Wall street didn't, corrupt politicians did.

so the right winger has never heard of

consolidated supervised entities

collateralized debt swaps

which cost the US economy ten TRILLION dollars

figures.


Look at who signed the
bailout checks. Bush and Obama with Congressional/Senate approval by
silence.

bailout

gee. why a bailout? because of WALL STREET GREED.

DUH

Egypt went from a democracy to a military dictatorship and Obama helped
it along. Go figure, Obama helped destroy a democracy.

HAHAHAHAHA gee and what did bush do about egyptian democracy??

NOTHING!!

Opened up his mouth and talked Mubarak out of office with IMF and
UN-diplomatic extortions. look at IMF as the NWO economic extortion arm
of the UN-Euro-US regime.

really? bush was president in 2011?


Which is why IMF could not control Libya -- Libay has inconsequential
near zero debt. Revoking credit on someone who does not need credit
isn't going to work, so use NATO to bomb them.

and the US role here?

about zero

so your paranoid view of the US and your support of ghaddafi is noted


This isn't unrelated to Gbagbo of Ivory Coast. Not at all, Gbagbo and
Gaddafi wanted an African unification and labour standards etc. Gbagbo
was not a UN puppet, so the UN financially and with arms backed a Muslim
rebellion with their puppet boy.

other than the fact he lost a fair election

Fair? UN armed and economically supported the rebels.

HAHAHAHAAH

they were armed AFTER gbagbo LOST the elections, you MORON!


Egypt was a democracy, and Mubarak was elected.

HAHAHAAH more delusions from the right. mubarak was elected!!!

he hates obama so much he's willing to lie

The NATO-US-Euro Regime marches on. Just like Nazi Germany, one country
at a time.

PPPHWWWEETT!!

GODWIN'S LAW VIOLATION!!

Not much different in WW II Germany invading Austria than NATO going to
Libya. Libya didn't provoke it this time. US-UN Regime did.

really? how many concentreation camps NATO set up?

oh. none. i've been to dachau. you're just an asshole


My guess is Kaddafi had the guts to tell Obama and UN NWO to shove it
where the sun don't shine. Taht is why hey want him dead, vengeance.

The only reason Obama got Osama, is it became politically convenient to
do. Botching the assassination attempt on Kaddafi blowing up a home
with 3 unarmed innocent uninvolved children in it, Obama needed to stop
the horror factor of US child killing, get Osama....

Plus, I am sure Obama would not like it if a GOP stood up in Congress
and asked Obama, if you have known where Osama is, why is it taking 8
months to get him? Hearing that from a GOP has obvious political risks.

On Jun 5, 9:32*am, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

No Boat realted content once again from the Virginia Teat-
Sucker...John Herring.

On 05/06/2011 8:39 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Jun 5, 9:32 am, John wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

No Boat realted content once again from the Virginia Teat-
Sucker...John Herring.

And lots of replies from the fleabaggers.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.