| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... In article , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? In all seriousness, harry could care less about them as most of them tend to vote republican anyway... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? In all seriousness, harry could care less about them as most of them tend to vote republican anyway... Oohhh..the loogywannabe wants me to respond to him....oohhh. Ain't gonna happen, crap-for-brains. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? In all seriousness, harry could care less about them as most of them tend to vote republican anyway... Oohhh..the loogywannabe wants me to respond to him....oohhh. Ain't gonna happen, crap-for-brains. Because you don't have a decent answer, dip****. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... In article , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. He did. He is more in the Westborough Baptist Church state of mind when it comes to our men and women in uniform. Remember, most of them vote republican anyway. -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
BAR wrote:
In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. I've previously posted several times that the military downsizing should take place as the economy and employment improves. The military remains an employer of last resort for many, and for that, it performs a task society needs. We've been blowing a half trillion dollars or more on the military for a long, long time. It's time for that lunacy to stop. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:17:19 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:58:01 -0400, Harryk wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. I've previously posted several times that the military downsizing should take place as the economy and employment improves. The military remains an employer of last resort for many, and for that, it performs a task society needs. We've been blowing a half trillion dollars or more on the military for a long, long time. It's time for that lunacy to stop. The soldiers are one issue but the biggest part of the military budget goes to the military industrial complex and the people in that business are smart enough to be sure they generate jobs in all 50 states so everyone in congress all has an ox to be gored if a contract is cut. That is why we are building planes the pentagon doesn't want like the extra C-17s. Therefore, we should shut down the gov't because of Planned Parenthood. I get it. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:57:48 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:11:56 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:17:19 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:58:01 -0400, Harryk wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. I've previously posted several times that the military downsizing should take place as the economy and employment improves. The military remains an employer of last resort for many, and for that, it performs a task society needs. We've been blowing a half trillion dollars or more on the military for a long, long time. It's time for that lunacy to stop. The soldiers are one issue but the biggest part of the military budget goes to the military industrial complex and the people in that business are smart enough to be sure they generate jobs in all 50 states so everyone in congress all has an ox to be gored if a contract is cut. That is why we are building planes the pentagon doesn't want like the extra C-17s. Therefore, we should shut down the gov't because of Planned Parenthood. I get it. Are we changing ther subject again? Trying to follow your logic is like riding a Mad Mouse. According to you, one is never supposed to talk about anything unless that's how the thread started. Why aren't you talking about Obama and slavery??? |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Obama endorses slavery
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 02:10:33 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 20:48:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:57:48 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:11:56 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:17:19 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:58:01 -0400, Harryk wrote: BAR wrote: In , says... In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:18:41 -0400, wrote: We should be concentrating on cutting back our miiltary expenditures drastically, to the tune of $100 billion a year, until we are down to a reasonable level. Half those savings can go to reducing the deficit and half can go towards funding needed social programs. That, and a serious tax increase on the wealthy, and we'll be out of the hole. I agree we spend too much on the military but if you cut it to zero, it would only cover half if the deficit. There are not enough rich people to make up the other $700B. You think all the deficit has to be paid down in one FY? I'm suggesting we cut the Pentagon by $100 billion a year until we're only spending $100 billion a year on the military, and using the savings to pay down the deficit and fund needed social programs and infrastructure rebuilding *and* increase income by making the wealthy pay a fairer share. So just how did you come to that number as a good number to supply our military? What will you do with all of the soldiers who will be out of the military and jobless? Oops, he didn't think about that. I've previously posted several times that the military downsizing should take place as the economy and employment improves. The military remains an employer of last resort for many, and for that, it performs a task society needs. We've been blowing a half trillion dollars or more on the military for a long, long time. It's time for that lunacy to stop. The soldiers are one issue but the biggest part of the military budget goes to the military industrial complex and the people in that business are smart enough to be sure they generate jobs in all 50 states so everyone in congress all has an ox to be gored if a contract is cut. That is why we are building planes the pentagon doesn't want like the extra C-17s. Therefore, we should shut down the gov't because of Planned Parenthood. I get it. Are we changing ther subject again? Trying to follow your logic is like riding a Mad Mouse. According to you, one is never supposed to talk about anything unless that's how the thread started. Why aren't you talking about Obama and slavery??? There should be some logical flow in your response. We were talking about military spending, 9 consecutive posts and you leaped to abortion. We (or Frogbreath) were talking about Obama and slavery. Why can't you stay on topic? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Senate apologize for the wrongs of slavery | General | |||
| Goldwater's Granddaughter Endorses...Obama! | General | |||
| Colin Powell Endorses... | General | |||
| Union endorses Republican... | General | |||
| Communist Party endorses Kerry | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
