Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

On 3/1/11 8:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.


Why not give it a try and let us know how long it takes for your
wife/significant other/dog/neighbor to move? :)

On Mar 1, 9:00*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 3/1/11 8:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote:



Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Why not give it a try and let us know how long it takes for your
wife/significant other/dog/neighbor to move? *:)

OK, Semester exam for Frogwatch Fiziks. You have 24 hours to decide
whether or not this idea will work (there is no right or wrong
answer). Regardless of your answer, support it with relevant
calculations. You will be graded on your methodology. SEE, THIS IS
HOW PHYSICS SHOULD BE TAUGHT.

On Mar 1, 7:50*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

In article 1666ae07-a48a-4feb-bc82-
, says...

On Mar 1, 7:50*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

What do you do if you live in a condo or apartment building in the city?

On Mar 2, 6:11*am, BAR wrote:
In article 1666ae07-a48a-4feb-bc82-
, says...





On Mar 1, 7:50 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. *That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

What do you do if you live in a condo or apartment building in the city?

Ask any wino...

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:28:38 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Mar 1, 7:50*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

It works for the dog and Ed ****s more than a family of 4.

You need to buy the high quality dog food. The higher the quality the
less the ****.

On Mar 2, 9:31*am, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:13:13 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:28:38 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Mar 1, 7:50 pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. *That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

It works for the dog and Ed ****s more than a family of 4.

You need to buy the high quality dog food. The higher the quality the
less the ****.

Ed is on a high fiber "diet" dog food. It isn't exactly cheap.

Amazing how much corn and soy meal costs now days.

On 3/2/11 7:43 PM, Tim wrote:
On Mar 2, 9:31 am, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:13:13 -0500, wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:28:38 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 1, 7:50 pm, wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

It works for the dog and Ed ****s more than a family of 4.

You need to buy the high quality dog food. The higher the quality the
less the ****.

Ed is on a high fiber "diet" dog food. It isn't exactly cheap.

Amazing how much corn and soy meal costs now days.


We spend about $70 a week on...kitty litter.

Cats...they eat, they sleep, they pee, they poop, and then they eat
again. :)

On Mar 2, 6:47*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 3/2/11 7:43 PM, Tim wrote:



On Mar 2, 9:31 am, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011 07:13:13 -0500, *wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:28:38 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

On Mar 1, 7:50 pm, *wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead
use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator)
and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate
the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried
powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and
carries it away for use as fertilizer.
Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids
the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A
home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank.
So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low
flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the
ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use
electricity to dry it.
OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so
good but it could work.

Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade
shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper
and all, next day, different location. *That would cut sewer costs and
help your lawn.

It works for the dog and Ed ****s more than a family of 4.

You need to buy the high quality dog food. The higher the quality the
less the ****.

Ed is on a high fiber "diet" dog food. It isn't exactly cheap.

Amazing how much corn and soy meal costs now days.

We spend about $70 a week on...kitty litter.

Cats...they eat, they sleep, they pee, they poop, and then they eat
again. :)

70 a week?????

good Lord!