|
dealing with shit
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People
keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. |
dealing with shit
On 3/1/11 8:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. Why not give it a try and let us know how long it takes for your wife/significant other/dog/neighbor to move? :) |
dealing with shit
On Mar 1, 9:00*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 3/1/11 8:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. Why not give it a try and let us know how long it takes for your wife/significant other/dog/neighbor to move? *:) OK, Semester exam for Frogwatch Fiziks. You have 24 hours to decide whether or not this idea will work (there is no right or wrong answer). Regardless of your answer, support it with relevant calculations. You will be graded on your methodology. SEE, THIS IS HOW PHYSICS SHOULD BE TAUGHT. |
dealing with shit
On Mar 1, 7:50*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. *People keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. *Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? *It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. *A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? *If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. *On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper and all, next day, different location. That would cut sewer costs and help your lawn. |
dealing with shit
|
dealing with shit
On Mar 2, 6:11*am, BAR wrote:
In article 1666ae07-a48a-4feb-bc82- , says... On Mar 1, 7:50 pm, Frogwatch wrote: Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. Wouldn't' a simpler solution be to go tot he back yard with a spade shovel, strike deep and turn the sod. Take a dump and re-cover paper and all, next day, different location. *That would cut sewer costs and help your lawn. What do you do if you live in a condo or apartment building in the city? Ask any wino... |
dealing with shit
|
dealing with shit
|
dealing with shit
On 3/2/2011 4:53 PM, Gene wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:50:13 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: Maybe there is a better way than just dumping it in the bay. People keep trying to make solar hot water work but maybe we should instead use solar collectors to heat ****. Really, liquefy it(a macerator) and then pump it onto your roof where solar concentrators evaporate the water (and kills bacteria) and a worm screw gadget feeds the dried powdered "effluent"into a box. Once a week, a truck comes by and carries it away for use as fertilizer. Why is this better than sending it to a "treatment plant"? It avoids the necessity of running sewage lines and uses on-site resources. A home could be completely off-grid without a septic tank. So, how much are we talking about drying anyway? If we all use low flush and front loading washers, the amount would be well within the ability of a rooftop solar concentrator. On cloudy days, you'd use electricity to dry it. OK, the thought of "a mess of steaming ****" on my roof don't sound so good but it could work. Maybe if more of you hadn't acted like **** HEADS, Peggie would still be here offering advice and information. Peggy left because of the behavior of some very specific individuals. We know who they were, and Harry Krause was one of them. Stop painting the group with your broad brush. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com