Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 12, 5:05 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Oct 12, 3:03 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:37:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Locked out? Then how did all those Republican ideas get incorporated into the bill? Because they were good ideas? They weren't any secret Yes, they were good ideas, but the Republicans (and wackos esp.) are claiming they were locked out of the process. Apparently not. You apparently have selective memory. http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/b...0/01/04/democr... Nice post. Thanks. Unfortunately, it wasn't all that secret was it, and it certainly wasn't as effective as "secret" reform should have been. But, some half-way decent legislation did pass, and there will be decent benefits for people, esp. those who lacked insurance or were cancelled. I never claimed it was "secret", just that one side of the aisle was locked out. And yes, Roff is opinionated, but that was just the first article from *many* sources that I grabbed a URL from. In the end, there was an effort by the Dems to rush a severly flawed bill through while excluding the Republicans from participating in the normal process. In that there is no doubt. The bill, while it does have some good ideas, is so severely flawed that it will likely not survive in any recognizable form. Meanwhile insurance rate have gone up and will not come back down, and both industries (medical and insurance) still have not been "fixed". Meanwhile the congress-critters have a gold-plated policy that we pay for, and the band plays on. Well, they weren't "locked out" either, at least not until they refused to cooperate in good faith. That's the point. They had every opportunity to contribute in a constructive way, and they refused to do it for purely political reasons. The noise from the right about Obama's terrible doings is pretty hard to miss. The facts are a bit different. He's very middle of the road, not even close to being a radical. Most of the Republicans who claimed to be middle of the road have moved FAR to the right. What passed was not "severely flawed" by any stretch. It's lacking in some respects, but that's typical of most legislation. It can and should be fixed, but it shouldn't be gutted, which is exactly what the right-wing nuts want to do, along with ending Social Security and Medicare of course, not to mention ending unemployment benefits for people. Insurance rates have gone up and will continue to go up. They would have done that (and did that) way before the legislation. You're correct that neither the medical profession or the business of insurance have not be fixed, but that's a huge issue that requires bipartisan support, something the Republicans will not do! So, what's your solution? Vote in Tea Baggers who are barely qualified (and I'm being generous)? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT health care | General | |||
How about that health care... | General | |||
Health Care | Cruising | |||
Health Care | General | |||
Health Care | General |