On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:49:46 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:31:31 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:27:21 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

lost leader. wrote:

The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie

No, they win elections because the alternative is handing
the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a
fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy,
regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but
democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a
republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his
ass.

So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you
had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that
you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about
you.

I have been a conservative since before I could vote.

Say no more. You've just announced you've had a pole up your ass
since your teenage years. Somehow that doesn't surprise me and likely
doesn't surprise anyone else familiar with your writings.

No, it just means that I have a set of values that were developed in my
youth by learning the value of hard work and where it could get you.

I do not seek government handouts and I don't believe anyone should seek
government handouts.

And that qualifies you as conservative. Guess what? I agree with you
and I'm a liberal. I also know that I'd have had one hell of a time
getting through school without food stamps. I had the good fortune of
being subsidized to the tune of$200/mo. for tuition, books, rent and
food and worked part time. I got to eat while I was learning courtesy
of the government. Now I give them a boatload every paycheck for
their investment in my nourishment.

Why didn't you get a job and feed yourself. Where is your self respect?

I had a job you simple dweeb. I was also taking a full load of
classes. I didn't make enough to pay for all and lived a frugal life.

Their investment in me paid huge dividends.

Maybe someday you can repay the investment the government has made in
you, but I doubt it. You're one of the red state blood suckers that
costs the government via subsidies.

YukonBound wrote:
He knows he's a huge failure so he attacks others to make himself
feel better.


That's exactly what Margaret said about you.
If she wasn't so soft hearted your nasty ass would be scrapping the
gutter about now.
Really? She said that? Your friend Margaret must be as delusional as
you, dummy.

jps wrote:

And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240
Wendy's burgers last year?


WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been
attacking someone else.

Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu
sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their
fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads?

According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast
food maven, Dan.

While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad
information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole.

Got to go clean my guns...

Secular Humorist wrote:


Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar
tricks here, little man.

I *do* know about you, though.
Just lies, a lot of lies.

On 9/20/10 7:25 PM, LG wrote:
jps wrote:

And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240
Wendy's burgers last year?

WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been
attacking someone else.
Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu
sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their
fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads?

According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast
food maven, Dan.
While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad
information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole.



And you've never posted here as Dan Krueger, Bob, DK, et cetera...right.
Bull****.

"LG" wrote in message
...
Secular Humorist wrote:


Grammar tricks? I write in plain, ordinary, simple English. No grammar
tricks here, little man.

I *do* know about you, though.
Just lies, a lot of lies.

Well, you're one of the experts when it comes to lying.

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:25:37 -0400, LG wrote:

jps wrote:

And how have you distinguished yourself other than by eating 240
Wendy's burgers last year?


WTF? I may have had four in the past year. You must have been
attacking someone else.

Really, you must have been concentrating on another of their menu
sections. Were you consuming their chicken sandwiches or may their
fish sandwiches in 2009 or maybe their delicious salads?

According to your long usenet history, you're a self proclaimed fast
food maven, Dan.

While your attempt at stalking is disturbing, it's also full of bad
information. I never posted about Wendy's food under any name, asshole.

Got to go clean my guns...

Oh, was it Burger King, asshole?

You are one weird mother****er. I expect Margaret knows.

In article ,
says...

BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

lost leader. wrote:

The Only Reason Democrats Win Elections Is Because They Lie

No, they win elections because the alternative is handing
the reins back to the republicans. Up until 2004 I was a
fence sitter, voting for the candidate I thought was worthy,
regardless of political party. In 2008 it was nothing but
democrats and it'll stay that way until I can find a
republican that doesn't have his head planted firmly up his
ass.

So you admit that you just kind of went with the prevailing wind and you
had no moral compass or grounding in reality or a set of principles that
you lived by and which guided your life. This explains quite a bit about
you.

Your attitude is the exact reason I jumped off the fence. You,
like many of your conservative brethren, take a statement and
twist it out of context in order to make the other side look
bad. Where did I say, or even hint, that I "went with the
prevailing wind"? Sort of sounds like I may not have researched
the candidates I voted for, which I did, extensively.

Which way is the wind blowing this fall and which way will you be
voting? Will you be voting with the crowd or will you be voting your
principles?

I have been a conservative since before I could vote. I learned the
value of hard work and self sufficiency. In 1980 while I was a
government employee, civil service, I voted for Reagan even though he
campaigned to reduce the size of the federal workforce. Voting for the
guy who may end up firing you, that is casting a ballot based upon
principles.

So you admit that you vote right even if you don't agree with
the candidate?

Correct. I cannot see a time where I would ever vote for a Democrat.
They do not represent my beliefs nor are they a principled lot.

In article ,
says...

"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ...
On 9/20/10 7:57 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...



The funny thing is that low-brain-output types like Bert don't believe
they're benefiting from government handouts. The list of what Bert gets
from the government is almost endless.

****heads like Bert think it's all been supplied by a higher power and
it's their due and right to have roads, bridges, water, sewer, gas,
electric, elementary through high school, community and four year
colleges, clean air and water, law enforcement, the judiciary and the
penal system, a system of hospitals and trained physicians who can
care for you, and a system that's struggling to keep our food safe
from the ravages of agribusiness.

Every thing you identified I paid for from the sweat of my brow.

Sorry, Bertie brain, but everything identified is subsidized...the taxes
you pay only cover a small portion of the cost of supplying you with
what you get. The rest is paid for by other taxpayers.


Those subsidizing Bar and you and me must be the rich taxpayers. The very people you detest.

Subsidizing? I do not receive a check or credit from the government, I
pay taxes.

I don't want to be a deadbeat. Tell me how much of a check I need to write the government to pay my fair share. By fair share, I mean excluding the graft that is skimmed from our tax payments.

Take the amount that the government lets you keep and send that to the
US Treasury.

I'll save you the trouble of answering. You don't have a frikkin clue. You pompous ass.

Why are you such a hater?

In article ,
says...

It is still a fact that Obama will be raising taxes on everyone on
January 1, 2011. I haven't heard Obama begging congress to send him a
bill that will extend the Bush tax cuts, like he did with the stimulus
and health care, the begging part. If nothing is done to extend the Bush
tax cuts it will be Obama's tax increases during the middle of a
recession. And, this will be the mantra of the right thru 2012.

So, whine all you want about how the media slices and dices video
footage or audio. But, know this, Obama's tax increases are coming and
they will be here quickly and they will be known as Obama's tax
increases, during the middle of a recession.

Blah, blah, blah.

Can't admit your lord and savior Hannity is screw-loose liar?

Bonehead.

You look good when you are whining.