wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 22:39:01 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Yes, D'Plume. There are always inventions in the works that you arn't
privy of, however your statement at face value appears that you don't
have much of a clue about anything, which is also compatible with
your nature.

This is just Plume changing the subject again. The open question was
how she would reduce the number of guns and she took off on a
biometric trigger lock that doesn't even exist yet. Do you think
anyone would actually buy that gun? They do make some that respond to
an RFID tag in a ring or watch but they didn't sell either.

Which I responded to. No subject was changed. Sounds like you don't
believe
there are technical as well as societal solutions to our problems.

You just avoided the question
How does making new guns with this miracle technology reduce the
number of existing guns? It really would only make the existing ones
more valuable much like the price of "pre-ban" semi-autos shot up when
Clinton passed the AWB. It wasn't rational but any time you say
something will not be made anymore, people snap them up.

I did not. If a gun can't be stolen and used illegally very easily gun
violence would go down.

Yes, you're right! Existing guns would not be affected and they would!!
become more valuable. If regs were in place that make it more difficult to
purchase used guns, then that too would limit their use for criminals and
would increase the likelihood they are properly protected.

Clinton? Are you talking about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm...Protection_Act