|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
great article in 'slate'...
http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
bpuharic wrote:
great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. http://s33.photobucket.com/albums/d6...-.jpg&newest=1 |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. That's right. The general population of blue states are better off than those in the red states. This, I suppose, is a bad thing... that under Democrat leadership, people tend to prosper. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/8/2010 5:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. I didn't know how bad home Construction is. One small business went out that was building construction materials. However Lowes and Home Depot are still around. Another that excavated rock for building in other parts of the Country shut down. I hadn't really taken note until today that all the Craftsmen and Tradesmen don't seem to be around the area. I don't know but they probably went to where there was some construction. Supplier Side Economics/Government is all about the wealth of those that seized American Industry and is shipping away production and cutting wages and importing near slave laborers while raising their compensation by leaps and bounds. Public Traded Corporations are really controlled for the fortunes of the few running them. Globalism is Feudalism. They already have the third world in their grip. They cam for America's wealth and figure they still have a good run to go here where there are resources to be exported and a talented people that can be forced to work for slave labor wages to survive. America is becoming a colony to Globalism that is not a Country but a control mechanism for the power and wealth of the Global/Foreign Merchant and Banker. If their first allegiance is to Globalism then they have no allegiance to America. They have a variety of terms they sling, as a force to silence, Americans such as Isolationist. They are making decisions in Washington for what is good for Globalism not Americans. That is their mantra they believe that for the good of the Global Economy will cower and shut Americans up Some how globalism will benefit us when our economy and life style reach parity with the lowest common denominator of the third world. We do not desire to have our life style and economy reduced to the lowest common denominator. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sep 8, 7:50*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! LMAO!! You constantly whine about not having any money, and having been screwed. So where does that leave you? buffy = not too smart |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:16:15 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:11:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. That's right. The general population of blue states are better off than those in the red states. This, I suppose, is a bad thing... that under Democrat leadership, people tend to prosper. Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and government workers do a whole lot better. Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Sep 8, 7:50*pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! LMAO!! You constantly whine about not having any money, and having been screwed. So where does that leave you? buffy = not too smart it leaves me with the other members of the middle class who are hated by the right |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:13:42 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:50:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote: http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! If you are so smart, why haven't you had a raise in 37 years? because the right wing has tunred the US into a plutocracy ever look up how many members of blue collar families go to ivy league schools? ever look up the rates of social mobility in the US? 1 of 2 conclusions is possible: 1. ALL children of blue collar workers are stupid 2. there is little social mobility in the US gee. i wonder which of these the DATA supports...tell me, right winger...which is true? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: On Sep 8, 7:50 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:35:12 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! LMAO!! You constantly whine about not having any money, and having been screwed. So where does that leave you? buffy = not too smart it leaves me with the other members of the middle class who are hated by the right You definition of middle class includes what income range? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
In article ,
says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, jps wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. Tell that to the Japanese. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message
... On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. Tell that to the Japanese. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- Another asshole for the bozo bin. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/9/10 10:17 AM, Harry ¿ wrote:
"Secular Humorist" wrote in message ... On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. Tell that to the Japanese. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- Another asshole for the bozo bin. You think Japan is rich in raw materials, eh? Another moron ID faker is what you are. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/9/10 12:25 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:00:00 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. Actually manufacturing is increasingly moving to the red states. Unfortunately Bob is right. Because it is easier to exploit red state workers. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/9/10 12:28 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:08:41 -0400, Secular wrote: On 9/9/10 8:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:34:19 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) Humor aside, I think it's big of me and all liberals. I'm completely aware of the fact that Red states suck resources from blue states but I accept that as a cost of citizenship in the USA. If it were the other way around, the Red states would be having a livid conniption with panties in full bunch mode. They **** and whine about their lot now, even tho' they'd be bankrupt without our largess. You should do some research and find out what the blue states produce versus what the red states produce. Without raw materials you cannot produce anything. Tell that to the Japanese. Last time I looked the Japanese were in more trouble than us. Their manufacturing model failed when MDQ took over. (Market Driven Quality) AKA WalMart The point was in raw materials. The Japanese import most of theirs to produce the goods they export. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:11:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. That's right. The general population of blue states are better off than those in the red states. This, I suppose, is a bad thing... that under Democrat leadership, people tend to prosper. Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and government workers do a whole lot better. I guess you think that the entirety of California is made up of those people? You need to get out more. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:34:44 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:16:15 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:11:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. That's right. The general population of blue states are better off than those in the red states. This, I suppose, is a bad thing... that under Democrat leadership, people tend to prosper. Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and government workers do a whole lot better. Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. Not as many and not as rich Wow... I think you need to do more research! http://www.averyindex.com/lawyers_per_capita.php |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:38:27 -0700, jps wrote: The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. Yup, and Red states suck more than they produce. Interesting take from a self professed liberal. I thought you folks were for income redistribution. ;-) You don't want to be rich? Ok. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:50:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote: http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! If you are so smart, why haven't you had a raise in 37 years? Duhh... he's rich. He's a liberal and lives in a red state! lol |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:31:57 -0400, lil abner wrote: One small business went out that was building construction materials. However Lowes and Home Depot are still around. They sell Chinese products on the cheap. They are still pretty slow. You certainly have no problem finding a parking space. Finding someone who knows anything in the store is tough tho. They are running pretty lean. Their business model is "this is a do it yourself store", If you want to find something, do it yourself. If you want it tied on your car, do it yourself. Most HD/Lowes these days even want you to check your stuff out yourself. HD/Lowes have excellent customer service. They explain things and help you pick out the right items. They definitely help you load your car/truck. They even deliver for a small charge, depending on the item, and they price match. Not bad. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 06:50:13 -0400, "Aggravated"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: it leaves me with the other members of the middle class who are hated by the right You definition of middle class includes what income range? 20-90% of the population |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:34:44 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:58:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:50:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote: http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! If you are so smart, why haven't you had a raise in 37 years? Duhh... he's rich. He's a liberal and lives in a red state! lol Eastern PA is about as blue as it gets. sorry. born and raised in pittsburgh. PA is hard core red. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 9/9/2010 5:32 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:57:49 -0700, wrote: wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:34:44 -0700, wrote: On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:16:15 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:11:24 -0700, wrote: Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and government workers do a whole lot better. Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. Not as many and not as rich Wow... I think you need to do more research! http://www.averyindex.com/lawyers_per_capita.php You are right. Lawyers are a virus that has infected every nook and cranny of the country sucking our blood like bedbugs. I still bet big city lawyers make more than the ambulance chasers we have here, simply because they have deeper pockets to pick. A Lawyer in a small Town decided he wanted the local boat launch and recreation of a neighborhood. Everyone, in the county, used it . There were no public hearings no notification to the residents..nothing. One day he told one Resident that he couldn't come back there again. he fenced it off. He sold the tractor and mower etc that the neighbors had kept there, to maintain it and sold them. Some of The Residents sought the services of another Attorney. No one would take it saying there was nothing they could do. In short it seems that they wouldn't do anything to one of their small cliche. Another Attorney got his car washed regularly at a local car wash, in a southern city. The car wash offered a free rewash of any vehicle, if it rained within it 24 hours. The Attorney started getting his car washed and parking it in the garage and taking his wife's car to have it washed .. The Owner caught on and said he couldn't do that. The lawyer said what's the difference. So the Owner quit giving coupons for the free re wash. Another Resident of a small town wanted the local boat launch and dock etc of another neighborhood. He wasn't a Lawyer but was in tight with the small cliche. No hearing no nothing He paid some taxes and took possession. he probably doesn't wonder why no one speaks to him. Trying to get an Attorney to rectify the situation was again fruitless. Two of the incidents were over five years ago. The other not so long ago. I know or knew many fine Attorneys etc but some of the new breed get into the profession purely to feather their pockets any way they can. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:58:48 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:50:18 -0400, bpuharic wrote: http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. ROFLMAO!! that's because liberals are smarter than conservatives! If you are so smart, why haven't you had a raise in 37 years? Duhh... he's rich. He's a liberal and lives in a red state! lol Eastern PA is about as blue as it gets. So, he's rich and lives in a blue state. I guess that means he's smarter or luckier than some people. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On 8-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. How can a middle class be poor and getting poorer? If they're poor, they're not the middle class" unless the "new middle class" are the schlubs in the "new service economy" desperately hanging onto their walkers just inside the door at Walmart. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:18:01 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:34:44 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:16:15 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:11:24 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:44:51 -0400, bpuharic wrote: great article in 'slate'... http://www.slate.com/id/2266025/entr.../?hpid=topnews multipart series...telling us what the right doesnt want us to know. The only problem with your characterization is a lefty is more likely to be rich. The blue counties are certainly richer than the red ones. That's right. The general population of blue states are better off than those in the red states. This, I suppose, is a bad thing... that under Democrat leadership, people tend to prosper. Lawyers, doctors, insurance companies and government workers do a whole lot better. Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. Not as many and not as rich Is it because blue states are just more packed with more natural and business resources or is it that blue citizens have made 'em that way? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:20:46 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:35:54 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:22:46 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:31:57 -0400, lil abner wrote: One small business went out that was building construction materials. However Lowes and Home Depot are still around. They sell Chinese products on the cheap. They are still pretty slow. You certainly have no problem finding a parking space. Finding someone who knows anything in the store is tough tho. They are running pretty lean. Their business model is "this is a do it yourself store", If you want to find something, do it yourself. If you want it tied on your car, do it yourself. Most HD/Lowes these days even want you to check your stuff out yourself. I hate all the Chinese crap they sell. I look for alternatives whenever possible. It's getting harder every day. Maybe it is time for a real thrust to buy American but that never really takes off when you see the price tags. Really? I bought a 23 year old german car rather than a new American car. Why? Quality. The 23 year old car rides, drives better despite lacking 23 years of technical progress. The 23 year old car was more expensive than most modern American boxes but it won't depreciate like the American pieces of crap. I'd much rather purchase a superior American product, even at a higher price. They aren't offered anymore because cheap **** imported by Walmart, Target and others have flooded the shelves. |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:58:47 -0700, jps wrote: Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. Not as many and not as rich Is it because blue states are just more packed with more natural and business resources or is it that blue citizens have made 'em that way? Interesting question. It has to be pointed out that the greatest income disparity is in the biggest cities so there is not going to be one answer. Another interesting thing is the two richest Americans (Gates and Buffett) do not live in a big city. Gates' house is near Seattle. Buffet lives outside of Omaha. You expect them to live in the inner city? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:33:33 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:23:30 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Because it is easier to exploit red state workers. The operative word is "workers". The blue state people were fired when the plants moved. ?? Completely untrue and at best an exaggeration that has little meaning. Tell it to Detroit. So, the auto industry laid off people who were mostly blue collar are doing better than their red state cousins? Are you claiming Michigan is a red state or blue state? It's so confusing! A UAW worker in Detroit or Indiana was making twice what a red state worker makes. That was Harry's point. Detroit is blue as is most of that area where the big factories were (Ohio, Indiana, Michigan), http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/ The jobs went to Tennessee, Georgia, Canada or Mexico. Have you seen the "content" sticker on an "American" car lately? They are usually about 40-50% American. If it is a foreign brand, manufactured in the US there still is less than 50% US content and the assembly will be in a red state. Nope... get the facts, then type.. http://mediamatters.org/columns/200811250012 |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
|
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
"Secular Humanist" wrote in message ... In article , says... wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:58:47 -0700, jps wrote: Sheesh, thought they had all those folks in Red states too. Not as many and not as rich Is it because blue states are just more packed with more natural and business resources or is it that blue citizens have made 'em that way? Interesting question. It has to be pointed out that the greatest income disparity is in the biggest cities so there is not going to be one answer. Another interesting thing is the two richest Americans (Gates and Buffett) do not live in a big city. Gates' house is near Seattle. Buffet lives outside of Omaha. You expect them to live in the inner city? 'Near' and 'in' are two entirely different things. Do you expect them to live NEAR the inner city? Happy now? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
wrote in message
... On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:06:24 -0700, jps wrote: Maybe it is time for a real thrust to buy American but that never really takes off when you see the price tags. Really? I bought a 23 year old german car rather than a new American car. Why? Quality. The 23 year old car rides, drives better despite lacking 23 years of technical progress. The 23 year old car was more expensive than most modern American boxes but it won't depreciate like the American pieces of crap. I'd much rather purchase a superior American product, even at a higher price. They aren't offered anymore because cheap **** imported by Walmart, Target and others have flooded the shelves. You just said two different things. He just loves his German screw drivers. I wonder if there are any quality American toolmakers left? |
the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
On Sep 10, 3:44*pm, "Harry ?" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:06:24 -0700, jps wrote: Maybe it is time for a real thrust to buy American but that never really takes off when you see the price tags. Really? *I bought a 23 year old german car rather than a new American car. *Why? *Quality. *The 23 year old car rides, drives better despite lacking 23 years of technical progress. The 23 year old car was more expensive than most modern American boxes but it won't depreciate like the American pieces of crap. I'd much rather purchase a superior American product, even at a higher price. *They aren't offered anymore because cheap **** imported by Walmart, Target and others have flooded the shelves. You just said two different things. He just loves his German screw drivers. I wonder if there are any quality American toolmakers left?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It is difficult to find a lot of items of any quality anymore, even if you spend the dollars. From clothes, to services, to restraunts... Nobody cares enough about quality to build it, and our (Americans) interest in it went out the window decades ago... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com