the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:05:34 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:





Forget all of your wild rants above - they're senseless:

My REVERSAL AND RETRACTION::

I have analyzed new information and have to retract my previous
recommendations and position.

There is no chance that multi-level production (concept, styling, design,
engineering, tool, management and production)can return to your country, the
United States. The current, and unlikely to be repealed encumbrances
prohibit companies from "moving back." The costs of operating in the U.S.
are prohibitive, so even if it were to happen, they could NOT be affordable
to pay the staff and labor for a long period without sales.

i already proved, in a different thread, that everything you said here
is wrong

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:15:09 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

(there's a dirty word
to you) and in socialist structures, inflation.

i love it. i'm for a decent middle class wage. that makes me a
socialist!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Live in ignoarance (contrary to the lazy fools, ignorance is not bliss) and
see my recent post of retraction. Companies are NOT coming back, so get over
it. This is what I now believe.


really? then why is manufacturing one of the fastest growing segments
of the economy?


The stupidity of increased taxes (????) and moronic D vs R rants are still a
waste of keyboard strokes.

increased taxes? the US has one of the lowest effective corporate tax
rates in the OECD

oh. you didn't know that.

no surprise

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Sep 28, 4:23*pm, Secular Humourist wrote:
On 9/28/10 4:20 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:

On 28-Sep-2010, *wrote:

Good grief... stick to what you know. I know that's pretty limited, but
give
us all a break. I can just imagine that you and your right-wing nut
friends
would think cancer is funny.

yeah they sit around the dinner table working themselves into a sweat
thinking about people 'committing sodomy'....not realzing alot of
straights do it, too.

pathetic actually

Normal people corn hole each other???? *I missed that. *Fortunately..

You need to log onto Scotty's "other" site.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Yes, he gives out free Colon checks....with his tongue.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:19:17 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Sorry, I didn't know Farah Fawcett was a turd burglar.

she was, sorry

Damm..so fine in her early years


Guess I did hit close to home, eh?

why? you seem to have a fascination for the issue. you a fan of
santorum?

No fascination, and, Santorum is an R, so he/she/it fits the venue of
corruption.

santorum is also a noun. it refers to the froth of semen and feces
from anal intercourse.


I'd just like the media to avoid publishing images of 2 deviants with pink
hair smooching on the front steps of a city hall. Was the Communications
Decency Act repealed?

deviants? why? you and your wife wear pink?

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:20:38 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Good grief... stick to what you know. I know that's pretty limited, but
give
us all a break. I can just imagine that you and your right-wing nut
friends
would think cancer is funny.

yeah they sit around the dinner table working themselves into a sweat
thinking about people 'committing sodomy'....not realzing alot of
straights do it, too.

pathetic actually

Normal people corn hole each other???? I missed that. Fortunately.

happens every day.

you're just an ignorant little right winger

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

"Foreign product" is relative to geography. If you are relating to the
former U.S., I PRODUCE foreign products.

no doubt defective baby strollers, meat with contamination, cars that
explode or other similar products

and lead based paint on the baby toys!!!

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

There is no chance that multi-level production (concept, styling, design,
engineering, tool, management and production)can return to your country,
the
United States. The current, and unlikely to be repealed encumbrances
prohibit companies from "moving back." The costs of operating in the U.S.
are prohibitive, so even if it were to happen, they could NOT be
affordable
to pay the staff and labor for a long period without sales.

i already proved, in a different thread, that everything you said here
is wrong

What you "proved" was that you accidently doubled your Thorazine® dosage.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

increased taxes? the US has one of the lowest effective corporate tax
rates in the OECD

oh. you didn't know that.

I'll help your comprehension of simple sentences. Many halfwits here blather
that taxes need to be higher. Go for it - production will continue to flee,
you will be poorer, and the downward spiral will continue faster than as
current.

The U.S. has the 2nd highest corporate tax burden on the planet. That
problem will be drecreasing as output accelerates it's flight from
persecution.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

So, now you're claiming productivity shouldn't increase? Do you want to
pick
one and let us know...

Productivity will increase if you call minimum wage clerks learning
functional English productivity.

What a nonsense response. Is that the best you have to offer?

I missed an important poit - tahnsk for the opportunity.

The productivity of minimum wage clerks HAS increased - they've been
partially displaced by "self checkout" at many retailers. A 25% reduction
in checkout employees is a serious increase in productivity.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

So, now you're claiming productivity shouldn't increase? Do you want
to
pick
one and let us know...

Productivity will increase if you call minimum wage clerks learning
functional English productivity.

What a nonsense response. Is that the best you have to offer?

I missed an important poit - tahnsk for the opportunity.

The productivity of minimum wage clerks HAS increased - they've been
partially displaced by "self checkout" at many retailers. A 25% reduction
in checkout employees is a serious increase in productivity.

Or, even better yet, close the store in the US and open it as an online-only
retailer in India. Oh wait, that doesn't actually increase productivity.
What does do is increase profits.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

The productivity of minimum wage clerks HAS increased - they've been
partially displaced by "self checkout" at many retailers. A 25%
reduction
in checkout employees is a serious increase in productivity.

Or, even better yet, close the store in the US and open it as an
online-only retailer in India.

EXCELLENT point - the online and phone service support of most companies has
been in that mode to 10-15 years. It gains a terrific increase of
productivity. Lower cost, higher profits.


Oh wait, that doesn't actually increase productivity.

It absolutely does. Increased output with less labor (and therefore labor
costs) is increased productivity.

What does do is increase profits.

That's good TOO!

We agree!

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:29:46 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

increased taxes? the US has one of the lowest effective corporate tax
rates in the OECD

oh. you didn't know that.

I'll help your comprehension of simple sentences. Many halfwits here blather
that taxes need to be higher.

they do.

Go for it - production will continue to flee,

prove it.

you will be poorer, and the downward spiral will continue faster than as
current.

prove it.


The U.S. has the 2nd highest corporate tax burden on the planet

wrong.

another piece of rightwing bull****

here's EVIDENCE that you're WRONG...as USUAL

http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...o_america.html

how do you feel when i keep treating your arguments like paul tibbets
treated hiroshima?

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:23:25 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 27-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

"Foreign product" is relative to geography. If you are relating to the
former U.S., I PRODUCE foreign products.

no doubt defective baby strollers, meat with contamination, cars that
explode or other similar products

and lead based paint on the baby toys!!!


i thought you replaced that with asbestos...

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

and lead based paint on the baby toys!!!


i thought you replaced that with asbestos...

The asbestos is used in the insulated underwear.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

another piece of rightwing bull****

here's EVIDENCE that you're WRONG...as USUAL

http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...o_america.html

how do you feel when i keep treating your arguments like paul tibbets
treated hiroshima?

Paul Tibbets made uninformed, midnless comments to the Japs? He hung out the
window of the Enola Gay and shouted "prove it?"

By the way, how's things at Amway?

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

The productivity of minimum wage clerks HAS increased - they've been
partially displaced by "self checkout" at many retailers. A 25%
reduction
in checkout employees is a serious increase in productivity.

Or, even better yet, close the store in the US and open it as an
online-only retailer in India.

EXCELLENT point - the online and phone service support of most companies
has
been in that mode to 10-15 years. It gains a terrific increase of
productivity. Lower cost, higher profits.


Oh wait, that doesn't actually increase productivity.

It absolutely does. Increased output with less labor (and therefore labor
costs) is increased productivity.

What does do is increase profits.

That's good TOO!

We agree!

Nope. Not for the worker laid off in the US. It increases profits for the
company, not worker productivity, which is what everyone is talking about...
But fine. No problem. Companies who move work offshore should have to pay a
penalty for this. Companies who hire in the US should get a tax break.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:06:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 28-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

another piece of rightwing bull****

here's EVIDENCE that you're WRONG...as USUAL

http://www.americanprogress.org/issu...o_america.html

how do you feel when i keep treating your arguments like paul tibbets
treated hiroshima?

Paul Tibbets made uninformed, midnless comments to the Japs? He hung out the
window of the Enola Gay and shouted "prove it?"

hAHAHAHAH you dont know what he did??


By the way, how's things at Amway?

dont know. how's your pick cadillac?

you mary kay fanatics...

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

It absolutely does. Increased output with less labor (and therefore
labor
costs) is increased productivity.

What does do is increase profits.

That's good TOO!

We agree!

Nope. Not for the worker laid off in the US. It increases profits for the
company, not worker productivity, which is what everyone is talking
about...
But fine. No problem. Companies who move work offshore should have to pay
a
penalty for this. Companies who hire in the US should get a tax break.

Companies that move offshore have no reason to have a legal or physical
presence in the former U.S.

the rich get richer and the middle class poorer
 

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 28-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

It absolutely does. Increased output with less labor (and therefore
labor
costs) is increased productivity.

What does do is increase profits.

That's good TOO!

We agree!

Nope. Not for the worker laid off in the US. It increases profits for the
company, not worker productivity, which is what everyone is talking
about...
But fine. No problem. Companies who move work offshore should have to pay
a
penalty for this. Companies who hire in the US should get a tax break.

Companies that move offshore have no reason to have a legal or physical
presence in the former U.S.

?? Like major banks and oil companies? That's fine if they don't want to
sell anything here.