Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#112
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:14:49 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:13:22 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:08:19 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:08:02 -0400, bpuharic wrote: what particular aspect of these documents comes as news to you? because NO ONE is surprised by ANYTHING in those documents. Most of these documents have not even be read and analysed yet but it certainly seems to be making the government nervous. I am sure the government knows we are bankrolling the Taliban with our payments to the corrupt governments over there but the public didn't really see it in government documents until now. ROFLMAO!! this is OLD news. hell, it's common knowledge the ISI is corrupt and a branch office of the taliban. Yet we still keep shoveling money into that corruption and killing our kids. guess you haven't been to NY. they killed alot of people in NY on 9/11. how are things at the nevill chamberlain fan club? |
#113
![]()
posted to rec.boats,misc.taxes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"bpuharic" wrote in message
... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:06:42 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:00:43 -0400, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:55:05 -0400, wrote: Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? let's see...when did cambodia attack us? uh...never You really are ignorant of history aren't you. We attacked Cambodia covertly because we said they were harboring the VC, just like Pakistan harbors OBL. really? the cambodians flew planes into NYC? wow. that's something NO ONE knew!! The whole thing unraveled after the Pentagon Papers exposed this all and it became clear that instead of trying to wind down an unpopular war, as promised by the new president, we were expanding it. I expect this and subsequent "leaks" to bring the same anti-war sentiment out this time. now let's see....the current 'leaks' have told us nothing new at all except to you. of course, one has to make allowances for right wing ignorance -- Me |
#114
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message om... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. |
#115
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/28/10 9:35 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. Flajim is now openly spoofing my ID here? What an ass he is. |
#116
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry " wrote in message m... On 7/28/10 9:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. Flajim is now openly spoofing my ID here? What an ass he is. Leopard doesn't change it's spots! |
#117
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"YukonBound" wrote in message
... "Harry ?" wrote in message m... On 7/28/10 9:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. Flajim is now openly spoofing my ID here? What an ass he is. Leopard doesn't change it's spots! ahd presheate et ifun ya wodunt stick yer nosz so fur up me arse. -- Me |
#118
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry ?" wrote in message
m... On 7/28/10 9:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. Flajim is now openly spoofing my ID here? What an ass he is. He's been outed already. No flies on you eh? -- Me |
#119
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"YukonBound" wrote in message
... "Harry?" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:54:13 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message m... On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message news:h1st461riqb2eq6k4bib8viv5odrchipu7@4ax. com... On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:00:28 -0400, bpuharic wrote: and afganistan? guess you havent heard of 9/11. Yeah I heard of it. I also heard the people who planned it have not been in Afghanistan for 6 years. hmmm...again you need to read the news. the taliban just abducted 2 US servicemen the other day The Taliban had nothing to do with 9-11. They are simply reacting to our invasion of their country. Not directly, but they were certainly allowing bin laden to do whatever he wanted inside the Afg. border. That was then, this is now and OBL is not in Afghanistan. We have managed to push that problem into a country that is a lot more dangerous than Afghanistan and almost as unstable, getting worse every day. Then or now, it doesn't matter. If we can stabilize Afg., then we have a better chance of finishing him. We could absolutely dominate Afghanistan and that still does not give us the right to invade Pakistan to get OBL ... unless you think that is our next step. Why does Cambodia seem to be coming up in my mind? OBL might not even be the biggest danger to the US these days. It could be another group in Africa or Indonesia and we are totally ignoring them in our obsession with OBL. I had a dog like that once. He saw a rabbit under the macadamia nut tree once and after that he had to go look there every time he went outside. There were rabbits everywhere but he kept trying to find that one. We always fight the last war and try to prevent the last attack instead of looking for the next one. Our biggest enemies aren't in the middle east. -- Harold Finally said something right... they work on Wall Street. Some of them, but you'll find the majority in D.C. and illegally entering our country. -- Me |
#120
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Avoiding Hazards At Sea | Cruising | |||
Avoiding Dehydration by staying wet at sea? | General | |||
avoiding head problems | Cruising | |||
Technique for avoiding collision with floating debris...... | Cruising | |||
Avoiding an Accidental Gybe - suggestions please | General |