On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:18:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/07/2010 7:29 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:04:39 -0400, wrote:

That doesn't make any sense. If you want to worry about something,
worry about supporting the lazy ****s who don't want to work.

you mean the wall street hedgefund managers?

Those guys work a lot harder than you do. 12 hour days and 6 or 7 day
weeks are not uncommon. The thing most people do not understand is how
hard rich people work to get rich and stay rich.
Greed is a real slave master.

Is it greed or desire for independance? I mean this seriously as to me
I never looked at it like greed. And never screwed anyone for a dime
doing it.

it's greed. there's a reason the financial sector accounted for 40% of
GDP in 2007 while the US did NOT become more competitive in world
markets. the financial sector added NOTHING to US assets

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:30:16 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

it's greed. there's a reason the financial sector accounted for 40% of
GDP in 2007 while the US did NOT become more competitive in world
markets. the financial sector added NOTHING to US assets

Where do you think the money for your retirement will be coming from?

that's the problem. there is none.


The whole basis for everyone's pension, 401k and IRA is that Wall
Street sector you seem to hate.

gee. that's why i'll have to work, like millions of others, until i'm
70

so you're right. wall street has our money for retirement

which means no one can retire. thanks. i already knew that

Retirees are by definition not adding
anything to the economy, they are living off of it.
The same is true of everyone on Social Security. You better hope Wall
Street stays 40% of the economy if you want your 401k to be worth
anything when you start sucking off the public tit.

bull****. wall street produces nothing. there is no value added in
trading CDO's

you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:30:16 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

it's greed. there's a reason the financial sector accounted for 40% of
GDP in 2007 while the US did NOT become more competitive in world
markets. the financial sector added NOTHING to US assets

Where do you think the money for your retirement will be coming from?

that's the problem. there is none.


The whole basis for everyone's pension, 401k and IRA is that Wall
Street sector you seem to hate.

gee. that's why i'll have to work, like millions of others, until i'm
70

so you're right. wall street has our money for retirement

which means no one can retire. thanks. i already knew that

Retirees are by definition not adding
anything to the economy, they are living off of it.
The same is true of everyone on Social Security. You better hope Wall
Street stays 40% of the economy if you want your 401k to be worth
anything when you start sucking off the public tit.

bull****. wall street produces nothing. there is no value added in
trading CDO's

you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's still time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income. You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over much. I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another of the
biggies.

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:


you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's still time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income.

that's true. unfortunately i'm 55. it's going to be a long hot summer

You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over much. I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another of the
biggies.

i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:


you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's still
time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income.

that's true. unfortunately i'm 55. it's going to be a long hot summer

You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over much.
I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another of
the
biggies.

i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.



Finally....a rational thought.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:


you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's still
time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income.

that's true. unfortunately i'm 55. it's going to be a long hot summer

You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over much.
I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another of
the
biggies.

i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.



At 55 you'd still see some benefit but it wouldn't be as good. I'd
definitely fund your 401K with the match but no more. The problem is that
taxes will increase, and you're going to have to take the money out at some
point. Even if you can offset somewhat, it'll still help.

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:49:19 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.



At 55 you'd still see some benefit but it wouldn't be as good. I'd
definitely fund your 401K with the match but no more. The problem is that
taxes will increase, and you're going to have to take the money out at some
point. Even if you can offset somewhat, it'll still help.

yeah i've been doing the minimum for awhile. lots of managers
recommend putting 10-20% in but no one has that kind of money and it's
nonsense to do that when it's far from certain wall street has a clue
about anything

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:55:21 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:04:43 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

yeah i've been doing the minimum for awhile. lots of managers
recommend putting 10-20% in but no one has that kind of money and it's
nonsense to do that when it's far from certain wall street has a clue
about anything

Have you ever thought of putting money into something other than your
401k? You could have a Roth that is tax free when you take it out.
Of course you could directly invest and be one of those "rich
*******s" who exploit the capital gains laws.

yeah. money markets or T bills at 1%. thatll do me alot of good. in
10 years 1000 dollars will be worth 1100.

great.

nom=de=plume wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:


you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's
still time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income.

that's true. unfortunately i'm 55. it's going to be a long hot summer

You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give
you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave
you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over
much. I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another
of the
biggies.

i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.



At 55 you'd still see some benefit but it wouldn't be as good. I'd
definitely fund your 401K with the match but no more. The problem is
that taxes will increase, and you're going to have to take the money out
at some point. Even if you can offset somewhat, it'll still help.


Bad advice. With catch-up he can put $22k this year in the 401k.
He should be maxing that to shelter it from taxes.
Even if it's money market with no return.
The feds won't let MM go below par because the economy would collapse.
That tax savings is money in the bank.
Maybe about 5 grand for him.
When he takes it out upon retirement he'll be in a lower or no-tax bracket.
Save, save, save. Then you die.
Or you could gamble with equity funds. But don't cry about it.

Jim - Financial whiz kid. Hey, I ain't broke or complaining.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:14:04 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:32:25 -0400, wrote:


you know **** about business. if what you say is true, then why is the
economy a disaster?

answer: because too many people believe as you do.


Not sure how old you are, but if you're in your late 40s, there's still
time
to have a shot at a decent retirement income.

that's true. unfortunately i'm 55. it's going to be a long hot summer

You might want to consider
alternative instruments, such as a modified whole-life insurance
policy.
They're not just about death benefits. There are some that will give
you a
payout that is tax-free income between say 70 and 85, and still leave
you
some cash balance without taking away from the death benefit over much.
I'd
suggest talking to a reputable agent, e.g., New York Life or another of
the
biggies.

i'd thought about that but the matching from my employer's 401K is
pretty good...i also have been talking with my funds manager about the
slowing of the economy to see where we go from here.



At 55 you'd still see some benefit but it wouldn't be as good. I'd
definitely fund your 401K with the match but no more. The problem is that
taxes will increase, and you're going to have to take the money out at
some point. Even if you can offset somewhat, it'll still help.


Bad advice. With catch-up he can put $22k this year in the 401k.
He should be maxing that to shelter it from taxes.

Nope. Right now, taxes are low, so it's doubtful that a it'll push him into
a higher bracket, and even if it does, you're talking about a couple of
percent. The future is much more uncertain, but it's very clear that taxes
will likely go up, and as a retired person, he should be minimizing his tax
exposure.

Even if it's money market with no return.

?? That makes no sense at all.

The feds won't let MM go below par because the economy would collapse.
That tax savings is money in the bank.

?? There tax savings of investing in a 401K is minimal at this point.

Maybe about 5 grand for him.
When he takes it out upon retirement he'll be in a lower or no-tax
bracket.

Actually, that's doubtful and thee money he'll be taking out will be much
less than he's likely to be used to living on. By putting money into
something that basically gives you back your own money, you can take it tax
free and mitigate what will have to come out of your 401k/ira and be taxed.

Save, save, save. Then you die.

Amend this with, save, save, save, spend, spend, spend, die, get a death
bene for your heirs.

Or you could gamble with equity funds. But don't cry about it.

Jim - Financial whiz kid. Hey, I ain't broke or complaining.

I'd suggest talking to a qualified financial advisor who gets a fee vs. a
percentage, and not listen to me or anyone else on this newsgroup. I also
wouldn't rely on "fund" managers. They've got an axe to grind also.