Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:24:10 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:12 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

You keep talking about unions, form one.


in the US you can't form a union without getting fired.


You missed the whole concept of unions. The point used to be that the
workers were so important to the operation that you couldn't fire them
all. Are you saying that you are so expendable that if your whole
office walked out, the company could replace you immediately?
We may be touching on why you haven't had a raise in 30 years.


let me type this slowly so you can read it

NO

ONE

IN the MIDDLE CLASS has had a raise in 30 years

so, then, right whiner...tell me. do you think i'm 100,000,000
americans?

because NONE OF US has h ad a raise you blithering idiot.

i dont know how many ways i can tell you that. i'm just concluding
you're too stupid to read


I know the world thinks unions are all just take but I grew up around
the people who built the Teamsters union (yes I knew Hoffa) and there
was a lot of pain in that process.


golly. i grew up in the steel town of pittsburgh

nah. we had no unions there...


BTW the biggest union busters in government were democrats.
I also understand in a NAFTA/GATT world, unions are not really going
to work until you can organize China, India, Mexico and Vietnam. It is
not an American problem.


and, of course, NAFTA was negotiated by george bush.

and, yes, unions will work just fine. they work in the EU where german
workers are heavily unionized and they have a competitive export
oriented economy

  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:12 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

You keep talking about unions, form one.


in the US you can't form a union without getting fired.


You missed the whole concept of unions. The point used to be that the
workers were so important to the operation that you couldn't fire them
all. Are you saying that you are so expendable that if your whole
office walked out, the company could replace you immediately?
We may be touching on why you haven't had a raise in 30 years.

I know the world thinks unions are all just take but I grew up around
the people who built the Teamsters union (yes I knew Hoffa) and there
was a lot of pain in that process.
BTW the biggest union busters in government were democrats.
I also understand in a NAFTA/GATT world, unions are not really going
to work until you can organize China, India, Mexico and Vietnam. It is
not an American problem.


Thanks for the perspective.


  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K

On 22/07/2010 7:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:07:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:12 -0400, wrote:

You keep talking about unions, form one.

in the US you can't form a union without getting fired.

You missed the whole concept of unions. The point used to be that the
workers were so important to the operation that you couldn't fire them
all. Are you saying that you are so expendable that if your whole
office walked out, the company could replace you immediately?
We may be touching on why you haven't had a raise in 30 years.

I know the world thinks unions are all just take but I grew up around
the people who built the Teamsters union (yes I knew Hoffa) and there
was a lot of pain in that process.
BTW the biggest union busters in government were democrats.
I also understand in a NAFTA/GATT world, unions are not really going
to work until you can organize China, India, Mexico and Vietnam. It is
not an American problem.


Thanks for the perspective.


It was an education. I went to several Joint Council 65 summer outings
at the Lake of the Ozarks. Seeing these old guys who were building a
union during a depression talk about "old times" will really give you
perspective. That was when unions actually dealt with employer abuses
of the employees instead of the other way around.


Today you have to worry about union abuses to the employee.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K


"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 22/07/2010 7:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:07:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:12 -0400, wrote:

You keep talking about unions, form one.

in the US you can't form a union without getting fired.

You missed the whole concept of unions. The point used to be that the
workers were so important to the operation that you couldn't fire them
all. Are you saying that you are so expendable that if your whole
office walked out, the company could replace you immediately?
We may be touching on why you haven't had a raise in 30 years.

I know the world thinks unions are all just take but I grew up around
the people who built the Teamsters union (yes I knew Hoffa) and there
was a lot of pain in that process.
BTW the biggest union busters in government were democrats.
I also understand in a NAFTA/GATT world, unions are not really going
to work until you can organize China, India, Mexico and Vietnam. It is
not an American problem.

Thanks for the perspective.


It was an education. I went to several Joint Council 65 summer outings
at the Lake of the Ozarks. Seeing these old guys who were building a
union during a depression talk about "old times" will really give you
perspective. That was when unions actually dealt with employer abuses
of the employees instead of the other way around.


Today you have to worry about union abuses to the employee.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?


You're a moron... nothing new.


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:24:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Today you have to worry about union abuses to the employee.


since the US has no unions, your tin foil hat paranoia is noted

  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,578
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:07:36 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:12 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

You keep talking about unions, form one.

in the US you can't form a union without getting fired.

You missed the whole concept of unions. The point used to be that the
workers were so important to the operation that you couldn't fire them
all. Are you saying that you are so expendable that if your whole
office walked out, the company could replace you immediately?
We may be touching on why you haven't had a raise in 30 years.

I know the world thinks unions are all just take but I grew up around
the people who built the Teamsters union (yes I knew Hoffa) and there
was a lot of pain in that process.
BTW the biggest union busters in government were democrats.
I also understand in a NAFTA/GATT world, unions are not really going
to work until you can organize China, India, Mexico and Vietnam. It is
not an American problem.


Thanks for the perspective.


It was an education. I went to several Joint Council 65 summer outings
at the Lake of the Ozarks. Seeing these old guys who were building a
union during a depression talk about "old times" will really give you
perspective. That was when unions actually dealt with employer abuses
of the employees instead of the other way around.


You don't believe that there are major employer abuses still going on?
Perhaps they're not clubbing people, but bad things still go on.


  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,106
Default ah, yes, the latest on my company 401K

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:20:02 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:09:40 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

It was an education. I went to several Joint Council 65 summer outings
at the Lake of the Ozarks. Seeing these old guys who were building a
union during a depression talk about "old times" will really give you
perspective. That was when unions actually dealt with employer abuses
of the employees instead of the other way around.


You don't believe that there are major employer abuses still going on?
Perhaps they're not clubbing people, but bad things still go on.

I certainly think the unions abuse the American public and business
more than business abuses employees


since there are no unions n the US this is simply wrong

and given the fact companies regularly kill their workers...for
example, BP just killed 15 workers in houston 3 years ago...where's
your proof?

.. There are plenty of laws to
protect employees these days.


bull****. like what?

Unions tend to drive up cost and lower quality.


gee. the germans have a world class export based economy that's
HEAVILY unionized.

the US, with NO unions, is not.

more right wing bull****

These days the
strongest unions are in government and education and that is very
apparent when you see how that is working out.


like I said there are no unions in the US

We spend more on education than any other country in the world with
some of the worst outcomes. K-12 in my county spends almost $20,000
per student.


gee. we spend more on healthcare too, and it's non unionized yet you
think it's perfect because it's free market.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama and the SEIU want to nationalize your 401K Frogwatch[_2_] General 20 March 27th 10 04:51 PM
( OT) Known by the company you keep Jim, General 24 April 27th 05 05:30 PM
Known by the company you keep Jack Goff General 14 April 23rd 05 07:10 PM
3 company 2 [email protected] ASA 8 December 6th 04 11:00 PM
looking for company Js9073 General 11 December 28th 03 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017