On Jul 18, 11:03*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:24:45 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 18/07/2010 10:37 AM, bpuharic wrote:
Hell, it's only down 10% for the year! *A wonderful success story.
just think, if GWB had his way, social security could have the same
success my 401K is having.

wall street just keeps giving it to the american people...and taking
it...

If you trust some 401K plan operator there is the mistake. *Might I
suggest learning how to invest it yourself?

gee. let's see... i work for a living. it's known as opportunity cost.
you dont know about economics, but look it up


Trading all the time you spend ranting here on the internet for
learning to invest would get you quite an education.

But it *is* easier to whine in lower case than to take responsibility
for yourself.

bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:24:45 -0600,
wrote:


On 18/07/2010 10:37 AM, bpuharic wrote:

Hell, it's only down 10% for the year! A wonderful success story.
just think, if GWB had his way, social security could have the same
success my 401K is having.

wall street just keeps giving it to the american people...and taking
it...

If you trust some 401K plan operator there is the mistake. Might I
suggest learning how to invest it yourself?

gee. let's see... i work for a living. it's known as opportunity cost.
you dont know about economics, but look it up


Takes years to get

reasonably good at it but the payout 10 years down the road is quite good.

uh huh. if that's the case what happened to the 14 trillion wall
street lost in equity over the last 3 years?


You are obviously suffering financially yet you still think the Dems are
on your side?

bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:18:25 -0600,
wrote:


On 18/07/2010 9:02 PM, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:50:30 -0600,
wrote:


IOW he thinks 100M middle class americans are lazy.

yep. he's right wing alright

I would say lethargic, but lazy will do. Many like you waste time and
energy blaming Bush when you should be learning how to manage your own
money.

now the right wng blames 100M americans...not the rich folks on wall
street...in spite of the fact it was wall street NOT main street that
sucked 14 trillion out of the economy in the last 2 years


Sooner or later you will realize Bush and Obama are just chess pieces on
the board game called life. All you have to do is figure out how the
game is going and profit.


gee. buy low. sell high. what a genius


Too many people also drunk on debt. Including government.

the reason middle class american is drunk on debt is we havent had a
pay increase in 10 years. middle class wages havent increased in 10
years as the rich took ALL of the productivity increase in the last 10
years for themselves and gave NONE of it in pay increases.

that's why the middle class isnt spending you mmoron

Why don't you drop your ISP and get another job, eh?

bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:08:07 -0400, wrote:


wrote in message
...

snip


not a single 401K manager has beat the market in the last 3 years.

snip

First of all, YOU and all participants are the managers of of 401K plans
within what is offered by your company.

irreleevant. show me a 401K funds manager that's beating the market
with a positive rate of return over the last 2 years...


Go to the link below and plug in "Up more than 0%" for the 3 year return
option of the screener. The other entries remain in the default setting.

http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html

and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.

Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU.

D.Duck wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:08:07 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...

snip

not a single 401K manager has beat the market in the last 3 years.

snip

First of all, YOU and all participants are the managers of of 401K
plans
within what is offered by your company.

irreleevant. show me a 401K funds manager that's beating the market
with a positive rate of return over the last 2 years...


Go to the link below and plug in "Up more than 0%" for the 3 year
return
option of the screener. The other entries remain in the default
setting.

http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html

and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.

I'm not confused. When I was working the 401K I had options to invest
in. There was a group of mutual funds, some government obligations and
a GUARANTEED interest option. If you, THE MANAGER, selected the
guaranteed interest option you would not have lost a penny in the last
three years. Or "I" could select a single mutual fund for my money.

If you work for a company that makes these choices for you, maybe it's
time for a new job with more liberal selection policies.

YOU are the MANAGER within the selections offered by your employer.
Well said. The key is to choose your investments based on your risk
level and projected retirement date.

Certain income funds are just as productive as money market funds. The
NAV will vary - even drop for a while, but you are adding shares through
reinvested dividends.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:08:07 -0400, wrote:


wrote in message
...

snip


not a single 401K manager has beat the market in the last 3 years.

snip

First of all, YOU and all participants are the managers of of 401K plans
within what is offered by your company.

irreleevant. show me a 401K funds manager that's beating the market
with a positive rate of return over the last 2 years...


Go to the link below and plug in "Up more than 0%" for the 3 year
return
option of the screener. The other entries remain in the default
setting.

http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html

and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.

Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU.

You'd think all the Limo Liberals here would get up a collection for poor
bpuharic


--
Harold

Harold wrote:
wrote in message
...

bpuharic wrote:

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 03:08:07 -0400, wrote:



wrote in message
...

snip



not a single 401K manager has beat the market in the last 3 years.


snip

First of all, YOU and all participants are the managers of of 401K plans
within what is offered by your company.


irreleevant. show me a 401K funds manager that's beating the market
with a positive rate of return over the last 2 years...



Go to the link below and plug in "Up more than 0%" for the 3 year
return
option of the screener. The other entries remain in the default
setting.

http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html


and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.


Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU.

You'd think all the Limo Liberals here would get up a collection for poor
bpuharic



Ya think he needs some wealth redistributed in his direction? From his
rants it's apparent he wasn't able to fend for himself.

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:39:08 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Mo


Go to the link below and plug in "Up more than 0%" for the 3 year return
option of the screener. The other entries remain in the default setting.

http://screen.yahoo.com/funds.html

and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.

I'm not confused. When I was working the 401K I had options to invest in.
There was a group of mutual funds, some government obligations and a
GUARANTEED interest option. If you, THE MANAGER, selected the guaranteed
interest option you would not have lost a penny in the last three years. Or
"I" could select a single mutual fund for my money.

ahem. let's see....the number of economists predicting this collapse
was about

5.

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:37:27 -0400, Larry wrote:



Certain income funds are just as productive as money market funds. The
NAV will vary - even drop for a while, but you are adding shares through
reinvested dividends.


IOW buy low

sell high

who cudda guessed.

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 19:27:39 -0400, Larry wrote:

bpuharic wrote:

and here is where you're confused. 401K's are managed by fund
managers...the funds they manage CAN do pretty well on an individual
basis. yet, unless you're a full time manager yourself, you have NO
idea which ones these are going to be.

Move your $40 to a money market fund and STFU.

poor little rigth wng baby.whatsamatter? rush talk nasty to you ?