| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give to animals' lives?
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:05:47 +0100, Julian
wrote: On 01/06/2010 14:42, Goo wrote: Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people I don't give a **** about him at the moment. You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups to vent even more of your spleen and distress innocent bystanders. Actually Goo is the person you responded to. After being referred to as Goobernicus for a number of years, the Goober resorted to mimicry calling me Goo out of desperation, envy, lack of imagination, and/or whatever else. That's the sort of person Goo is. He is well known to Google also, and a Google search for Goobernicus Gonad will reveal much about the sort of person you're dealing with when responding to Goo. My argument is with advocates of the gross mi$nomer "animal rights". In complete contrast to the animal welfare objective, the objective behind the misnomer is not to provide domestic animals with better lives, longer lives, rights, or anything at all. The objective behind the misnomer is to eliminate domestic animals, not provide them with rights. I point that out and people like Goo are maniacally opposed to seeing it pointed out. I also encourage people to consider the fact that many livestock animals have decent lives of positive value. Just as many do not, many do as well. Misnomer addicts like the Goober are extremely opposed to seeing that taken into consideration, because considering that aspect of the situation suggests that providing decent AW could be considered ethically equivalent or superior to the elimination objective. They don't have any real argument against considering the lives of the animals we're discussing, so they resort to lies and personal insults as you may or may not have noticed from Goo. |
|
#2
posted to alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should bethe practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give toanimals' lives?
On 6/1/2010 8:58 AM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward -
fearfully ran away again: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:05:47 +0100, Julian wrote: On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out: Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people I don't give a **** about him at the moment. You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups to vent even more of your spleen and distress innocent bystanders. Actually Fred is the person you responded to. Actually, Goo, *you* are the one who keeps fearfully running away from the question: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give to animals' lives? |
|
#3
posted to alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give to animals' lives?
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Goo pretended to want to
learn: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" People should consider that providing decent AW would be ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals Goob, including the ones raised for food... In many cases it already IS ethically equivalent or superior in fact, Goo. |
|
#4
posted to alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should bethe practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give toanimals' lives?
On 6/1/2010 2:27 PM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward -
bull****ted: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out that Goo-the-Coward *cannot* answer the question: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" People should consider that providing decent AW would be ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals That's not it, Goo. That's not the trap you're trying to lead them into, Goo. Try again, Goo. |
|
#5
posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give to animals' lives?
Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/1/2010 2:27 PM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward - bull****ted: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out that Goo-the-Coward *cannot* answer the question: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" People should consider that providing decent AW would be ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals That's not it, Goo. That's not the trap you're trying to lead them into, Goo. Try again, Goo. Please, please, please, Could you kindly leave alt.philosophy.zen and and alt.zen out of this? Thank you. |
|
#7
posted to alt.zen,alt.philosophy.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goo-the-Coward Harrison continues to run away - What should bethe practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo wants us to give toanimals' lives?
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward - attempted to bull****:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:47:53 -0700, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out: On 6/1/2010 2:27 PM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward - attempted to bull****: On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Fred C. Dobbs thoughtfully queried: What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" People should consider that providing decent AW would be ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals Goob, including the ones raised for food... In many cases it already IS ethically equivalent or superior in fact, Goo. That's not it. That's not the trap you're trying to lead them into, Goo. Try again, Goo. That is it It isn't, Goo. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goowants us to give to animals' lives? | General | |||
| What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goowants us to give to animals' lives? | General | |||
| Sailing Vessels - "Harrison-untitled_Trawler_-sj.jpg" 209.8 KBytes yEnc | Tall Ship Photos | |||
| David Harrison is inferior to "chico" | General | |||
| "Frank" the fake nym continues to make excuses | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
