On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:44:52 -0700, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:

On 6/1/2010 7:26 AM, DT wrote:
Julian wrote:
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Julian, Julian, Julian!

Mr. Dobbs has informed us that he is not responsible for the
crossposting; someone else makes him do it.

Nope - I just take the cross-postings as I find them.

LOL!!!

You are the one who began the thread you stupid Goober. On the
plus side for other people though Goo, the absurd blatancy of
this dishonesty has presented us with yet another hilarious
example of you outstupiding yourself AGAIN. LOL...what a goober.

On 6/1/2010 2:26 PM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward -
bull****ted:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 07:44:52 -0700, "Fred C. Dobbs"
wrote:

On 6/1/2010 7:26 AM, DT wrote:
Julian wrote:
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Julian, Julian, Julian!

Mr. Dobbs has informed us that he is not responsible for the
crossposting; someone else makes him do it.

Nope - I just take the cross-postings as I find them.

LOL!!!

You're still running away, Goo. You will not - because you *cannot* -
answer the question, Goo.

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:05:47 +0100, Julian
wrote:

On 01/06/2010 14:42, Goo wrote:

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Actually Goo is the person you responded to. After being
referred to as Goobernicus for a number of years, the Goober
resorted to mimicry calling me Goo out of desperation, envy, lack
of imagination, and/or whatever else. That's the sort of person
Goo is. He is well known to Google also, and a Google search for
Goobernicus Gonad will reveal much about the sort of person
you're dealing with when responding to Goo.

My argument is with advocates of the gross mi$nomer "animal
rights". In complete contrast to the animal welfare objective,
the objective behind the misnomer is not to provide domestic
animals with better lives, longer lives, rights, or anything at
all. The objective behind the misnomer is to eliminate domestic
animals, not provide them with rights. I point that out and
people like Goo are maniacally opposed to seeing it pointed out.
I also encourage people to consider the fact that many livestock
animals have decent lives of positive value. Just as many do not,
many do as well. Misnomer addicts like the Goober are extremely
opposed to seeing that taken into consideration, because
considering that aspect of the situation suggests that providing
decent AW could be considered ethically equivalent or superior to
the elimination objective. They don't have any real argument
against considering the lives of the animals we're discussing, so
they resort to lies and personal insults as you may or may not
have noticed from Goo.

On 6/1/2010 8:58 AM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward -
fearfully ran away again:

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:05:47 +0100, Julian
wrote:

On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out:

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Actually Fred is the person you responded to.

Actually, Goo, *you* are the one who keeps fearfully running away from
the question:

What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration" Goo
wants us to give to animals' lives?

On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Goo pretended to want to
learn:

What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration"

People should consider that providing decent AW would be
ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals
Goob, including the ones raised for food... In many cases it
already IS ethically equivalent or superior in fact, Goo.

On 6/1/2010 2:27 PM, Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Coward -
bull****ted:
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 09:52:06 -0700, Fred C. Dobbs pointed out that Goo-the-Coward *cannot* answer the question:

What should be the practical consequence of the "consideration"

People should consider that providing decent AW would be
ethically equivalent or superior to eliminating domestic animals

That's not it, Goo. That's not the trap you're trying to lead them
into, Goo.

Try again, Goo.

"Julian" wrote in message
...
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

What is the name of your home group? I will consider taking the matter up
with the local authorities

On 04/06/2010 03:29, Dutch wrote:

"Julian" wrote in message
...
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.
You are the ****wit in this situation for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups
to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

What is the name of your home group? I will consider taking the matter
up with the local authorities

LOL

Please excuse me a moment while I repo my teeth...

ABSFG

On 6/1/2010 7:05 AM, Julian wrote:
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.

I do.

You are the ****wit in this situation

No.


for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups

You mean uninterested; disinterested means something else.

Anyway, you're full of ****. Many people in these cross-posted groups
are interested.

I'm curious: since you're full of ****, do you sweat ****?


to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Blow it out your ass, bitch.

On 04/06/2010 04:25, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
On 6/1/2010 7:05 AM, Julian wrote:
On 01/06/2010 14:42, Fred C. Dobbs wrote:
Goo - ****wit David Harrison, The Goober - always criticizes people

I don't give a **** about him at the moment.

I do.

You are the ****wit in this situation

No.


for initiating
yet another new crosspost to disinterested groups

You mean uninterested; disinterested means something else.

Anyway, you're full of ****. Many people in these cross-posted groups
are interested.

Yeah, they're all participating.. count them... err... have you got a
finger?


I'm curious: since you're full of ****, do you sweat ****?


to vent even more of your spleen and distress
innocent bystanders.

Blow it out your ass, bitch.

OK... so you are obsessed with **** and assholes.

Chacun à son goût.