| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#51
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
My next sailing fantasy
On 4/12/10 9:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). Yes, you're all of those things. Do you have a point or are you just foaming at the mouth again? "Larry" was funnier when he was Dan Krueger, but, alas, Freddie Krueger sued him for defamation of the Krueger family name. -- http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym |
|
#52
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 12, 8:33*pm, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message m... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. *You're a stalker. *You're not qualified to tell me what to do. *You have no life outside of here. *You're a hillbilly. *You are an idiot. *Next time read the thread. *Show me where I said that. *I think faster than I type. *You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. *I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. |
|
#53
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, Larry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message m... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#54
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? |
|
#55
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#56
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. |
|
#57
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. Comes and goes... not sure why. It mostly works. -- Nom=de=Plume |
|
#58
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
On Apr 14, 7:48*pm, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message .... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, * wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, * wrote: * wrote in message news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4a x.com... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. *Ewww...that'sa nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. *Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. *Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. The problem is between the seat cushion and the keyboard. |
|
#59
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My next sailing fantasy
"Jack" wrote in message
... On Apr 14, 7:48 pm, Larry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 8:33 pm, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote: wrote in message news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4a x.com... On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, wrote: On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400, wrote: I'm still "out there doing real work. I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days. How are the pay and benefits? Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I do Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I will allow youto maintain that fantasy. Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic. -- Nom=de=Plume- Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the argument. The next post will prove my point. I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course. -- Nom=de=Plume Point proven, Jack. Yeah, that you're a stalker. -- Nom=de=Plume I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom- de-fraud Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. In my best Nom=Duh=Plume... You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with diversional bull****). You nailed her. Ewww...that'sa nasty thought. OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf) That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one. Reply: You're some kinda man. Vulgar, rude, and not to smart. Buzz of bird brain. What news reader forces you to type "Reply:"? Outcrap Express of course. It worked correctly this time. The problem is between the seat cushion and the keyboard. Right. That's why I have to type the word reply from time to time. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sailing Vessels - "Sailing Windjammer Ship.jpg" 80.3 KBytes yEnc | Tall Ship Photos | |||
| Flesh & Fantasy Women at Play Firestorm | General | |||
| Fantasy Congressional League... | General | |||
| speaking of fantasy... | General | |||
| Right up somebody's fantasy alley, I'm sure | General | |||
Linear Mode
