On Apr 12, 8:33*pm, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
....
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

....
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

....
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

m...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days..

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill,
I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win
an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think.

In my best Nom=Duh=Plume...

You really need to get laid. *You're a stalker. *You're not qualified to
tell me what to do. *You have no life outside of here. *You're a
hillbilly. *You are an idiot. *Next time read the thread. *Show me where
I said that. *I think faster than I type. *You forgot to ask me if I
care what you think. *I don't care what you think (but I will respond
with diversional bull****).

You nailed her. Ewww...that's a nasty thought.

OK, you pegged her. Err.. try again. (barf)

That was a spot-on obversation of the bitch's postings. Good one.