"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Point proven, Jack.


Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Apr 12, 12:47*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Jack" wrote in message

....
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days..

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:



wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud



What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 12, 2:26*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:





On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, *wrote:
*wrote in message

....
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

....
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

m...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days..

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?

On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:





On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?


You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If
you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or
worse.

..

--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

On Apr 12, 2:54*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, *wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, * *wrote:
* *wrote in message

....
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, * *wrote:

* *wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, * *wrote:

* *wrote in message

news:rds1s51vrakgr5u7a6hjp33bhf0doff437@4ax. com...

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud

What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.

--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?

You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If
you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or
worse.



Okay..... I'm not.....

Loogypicker wrote:
On Apr 12, 2:54 pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:47 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Apr 12, 2:26 pm, wrote:
On 4/12/10 2:24 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:
On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:
I'm still "out there doing real work.
I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.
How are the pay and benefits?
Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do
Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill, I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.
Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.
--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.
The next post will prove my point.
I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.
Yeah, that you're a stalker.
--
Nom=de=Plume
I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud
What? Loogy is a woman, and so are the packs of righties who hide behind
anonymous IDs.
--http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
We'll see in a few weeks. Oh, and is your real name hk, lady?
You aren't going to show up here. There's no reason for you to do so. If
you showed up and started any trouble, you'd end up in the slammer...or
worse.



Okay..... I'm not.....

I knew he'd talk you out of it.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"Wayne.B" wrote in message

.. .

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400, hk
wrote:

On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:

I'm still "out there doing real work.

I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.

How are the pay and benefits?

Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do

Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill,
I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.

Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win
an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.

--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.

The next post will prove my point.

I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume

I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud


Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think.
--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:




wrote in message


...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:


wrote in message


...


On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:


On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:


I'm still "out there doing real work.


I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.


How are the pay and benefits?


Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do


Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill,
I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.


Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win
an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.


--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.


The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.


--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud


Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think.

In my best Nom=Duh=Plume...

You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to
tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a
hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where
I said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I
care what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond
with diversional bull****).

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Apr 12, 12:47 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Apr 11, 1:51 pm, wrote:




wrote in message


...
On Apr 10, 9:13 pm, wrote:


wrote in message


...


On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:12:21 -0400,
wrote:


On 4/10/10 2:09 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:31:35 -0400,
wrote:


I'm still "out there doing real work.


I had no idea that trolling Usenet was considered work these days.


How are the pay and benefits?


Trolling usenet? My guess is that you post in more newsgroups than I
do


Since no one ever wins an argument with a woman or the mentally ill,
I
will allow youto maintain that fantasy.


Men would be a lot smarter and happier if they stopped trying to win
an
argument with a woman. It might be tactical, but it isn't strategic.


--
Nom=de=Plume-
Only because the woman is too stupid to realize that she's lost the
argument.


The next post will prove my point.


I guess you don't get laid that often, unless you pay cash of course.


--
Nom=de=Plume
Point proven, Jack.

Yeah, that you're a stalker.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I do not believe there are any women in this discussion, including Nom-
de-fraud


Poor baby. You forgot to ask me if I care what you think.

In my best Nom=Duh=Plume...

You really need to get laid. You're a stalker. You're not qualified to
tell me what to do. You have no life outside of here. You're a
hillbilly. You are an idiot. Next time read the thread. Show me where I
said that. I think faster than I type. You forgot to ask me if I care
what you think. I don't care what you think (but I will respond with
diversional bull****).

Yes, you're all of those things. Do you have a point or are you just foaming
at the mouth again?

--
Nom=de=Plume