"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


Yeah, but that's my choice. You don't have a choice, apparently.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?

On 07/04/2010 4:37 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then
divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?

Operative word for sure, dingbat.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/04/2010 4:37 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to
the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs.
Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then
divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?

Operative word for sure, dingbat.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


In your case: idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to
the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs.
Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then
divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?


Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?


If a fool such as yourself posts and no one reads it, did you actually post?

--
Nom=de=Plume