On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and
they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid
the depreciation.



You are entitled to your opinion.

Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are
constructed?
Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers
and the general construction and design of the important elements of a
boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on
one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one?
Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter
maneuvering? I suspect not.

Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited
comments simply because I owned one.

I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly
regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and
built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the
same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and
boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago.

I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions
of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but
I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the
difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for
almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit",
depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well.

Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor.

Eisboch

Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ?


Sure. It is spelled D. Duck.

That's about all you do here, quacker...troll.

hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and
they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid
the depreciation.



You are entitled to your opinion.

Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are
constructed?
Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers
and the general construction and design of the important elements of a
boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on
one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one?
Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter
maneuvering? I suspect not.

Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited
comments simply because I owned one.

I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly
regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and
built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the
same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and
boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago.

I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions
of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but
I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the
difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for
almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit",
depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well.

Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor.

Eisboch

Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ?


Sure. It is spelled D. Duck.

That's about all you do here, quacker...troll.

And 99% of the drivel you post here is what?

On 3/24/10 6:49 AM, D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and
they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid
the depreciation.



You are entitled to your opinion.

Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are
constructed?
Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers
and the general construction and design of the important elements of a
boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on
one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one?
Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter
maneuvering? I suspect not.

Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited
comments simply because I owned one.

I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly
regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and
built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the
same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and
boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago.

I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions
of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but
I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the
difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for
almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit",
depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well.

Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor.

Eisboch

Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ?


Sure. It is spelled D. Duck.

That's about all you do here, quacker...troll.

And 99% of the drivel you post here is what?


Quack, quack, quack.

hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:49 AM, D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and
they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid
the depreciation.



You are entitled to your opinion.

Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are
constructed?
Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers
and the general construction and design of the important elements of a
boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on
one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one?
Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter
maneuvering? I suspect not.

Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited
comments simply because I owned one.

I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly
regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and
built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the
same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and
boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago.

I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions
of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but
I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the
difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for
almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit",
depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well.

Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor.

Eisboch

Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ?


Sure. It is spelled D. Duck.

That's about all you do here, quacker...troll.

And 99% of the drivel you post here is what?


Quack, quack, quack.


At least it's not a four letter word.

D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote:


That's about all you do here, quacker...troll.

And 99% of the drivel you post here is what?

Very good. Most here would have said dribble.
Nice to see a poster with education, paying attention to what he says.
I do believe you are the intellectual of rec.boats.
That you seldom post here tends to confirm that.

Jim - Easing off bashing dumb libs for a moment.