Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? Sure. It is spelled D. Duck. That's about all you do here, quacker...troll. And 99% of the drivel you post here is what? |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/10 6:49 AM, D.Duck wrote:
hk wrote: On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? Sure. It is spelled D. Duck. That's about all you do here, quacker...troll. And 99% of the drivel you post here is what? Quack, quack, quack. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hk wrote:
On 3/24/10 6:49 AM, D.Duck wrote: hk wrote: On 3/24/10 6:41 AM, D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? Sure. It is spelled D. Duck. That's about all you do here, quacker...troll. And 99% of the drivel you post here is what? Quack, quack, quack. At least it's not a four letter word. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "D.Duck" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? sigh Yep. Even in a genuine, boating related thread. Seems the subject doesn't matter. Politics or boating ... all the same to a troll. Insults are their specialty. Eisboch |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... "D.Duck" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? sigh Yep. Even in a genuine, boating related thread. Seems the subject doesn't matter. Politics or boating ... all the same to a troll. Insults are their specialty. Eisboch Yeah, Tim and I have talked about that. What do you think it is that makes almost exclusively the "far left" members of this (and most other groups I frequent) group so vulgar and determined to destroy any functioning group they visit? I mean, you look at the most vulgar here, you have Slammer, Harry, JPS, spewing every shocking, pathetic, vulgar, insult at anybody that tries to post here, it's a pattern with the far left, you can't deny it... Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/10 7:39 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
Yeah, Tim and I have talked about that. What do you think it is that makes almost exclusively the "far left" members of this (and most other groups I frequent) group so vulgar and determined to destroy any functioning group they visit? I mean, you look at the most vulgar here, you have Slammer, Harry, JPS, spewing every shocking, pathetic, vulgar, insult at anybody that tries to post here, it's a pattern with the far left, you can't deny it... Scotty You talked to Tim about it? Did Tim bring up the dozens of posts of yours that are full of vulgarities and insults? I'll bet he didn't. *Far* left? Me? JPS? Slammer? That's hilarious, and further proof that when brains were handed out, you were in the kitchen, wrenching on your motorbike. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch You are wasting your time trying to sell the merits of that boat to JPS. He couldn't afford one even if he mortgaged his house and sold his girls into slavery. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
D.Duck wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/24/10 8:26 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
D.Duck wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Navigator, big plastic boat. Never liked the lines or the look and they drop value pretty quick. Somebody was happy with you having paid the depreciation. You are entitled to your opinion. Ever been in one in 8 foot confused seas? Ever seen how they are constructed? Ever been in the engine spaces and seen the size of the main stringers and the general construction and design of the important elements of a boat? Ever spent 10 hours a day at cruise speed, 30 miles offshore on one? Have you owned one? Ever spent any serious time underway on one? Have you piloted one in rough seas? Handled one in close quarter maneuvering? I suspect not. Something tells me you don't like them and made your unsolicited comments simply because I owned one. I agree they are not "pretty" in the eyes of all, but they are highly regarded in marine surveyor's circles as being very well designed and built from a marine engineering point of view. They are basically the same boat as a Californian Yacht, the original Marshall design and boat line which he sold and then purchased back a few years ago. I could recite the main reason I decided to buy one, and the opinions of seasoned, larger boat owners who were underway on the one I had but I doubt they would be meaningful to you. I also don't think that the difference in what I originally paid for it and what I sold it for almost 9 years later represented an excessive "hit", depreciation-wise. Very few new boats hold their value well. Don't quit your day job to become a marine surveyor. Eisboch Can you spell T-R-O-L-L ? It's more than that. Eisbock is obviously successful and JPS is Jealous of the fact. Anonymous trolls are the worst. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
stainless rigging wire - nick in wire | Cruising | |||
VETUS EXHAUST HOSE | Boat Building | |||
Yanmar 2QM15 muffler, exhaust hose? | Cruising | |||
steel wire hose clamps | Cruising | |||
Johnson 3 wire trim motor.. Red, Blue, green.. How to wire up? | General |