"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:30:30 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.

gee. he forgets..or ignores, the fact the rich WHITE guy spent a
TRILLION in iraq for NOTHING. at least obama is spending on the US
economy. bush paid his rich halliburton/KKR buddies.


One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

you mean because unemployment has dropped 3% over the last few months?
that what you complaining about?

you want it at 25%. good luck with that, right winger


Well, to give him credit, the chart at this site is pretty subtle.
Perhaps it's too subtle for Canuck.

http://palatnikfactor.com/2010/02/06...resident-bush/

--
Nom=de=Plume


That chart showes that Obama's "Stimulus" has failed. Resolutely failed.
There are less jobs being lost each month because there are not that many
jobs being done. Show us a chart of the real unemployment.

Good God... it's a mirror of what Bush caused. You really need to stop
listening to Rush.

There's a recovery underway. It may not be strong, it might not even be
sustainable. We'll have to wait and see, but to deny reality....

FYI, it's fewer jobs being loss, not less jobs being lost, but you got it
right fewer jobs are being lost. Yes, there are people dropping off the
unemployment roles and are no longer being counted. Yes, the unemployment
numbers are worse because of this fact, but the rate of job loss is slowing.
Just about all economists agree that the job situation isn't getting worse
but getting better.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:30:30 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:


I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.
gee. he forgets..or ignores, the fact the rich WHITE guy spent a
TRILLION in iraq for NOTHING. at least obama is spending on the US
economy. bush paid his rich halliburton/KKR buddies.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?
you mean because unemployment has dropped 3% over the last few months?
that what you complaining about?

you want it at 25%. good luck with that, right winger

Well, to give him credit, the chart at this site is pretty subtle.
Perhaps it's too subtle for Canuck.

http://palatnikfactor.com/2010/02/06...resident-bush/

--
Nom=de=Plume

That chart showes that Obama's "Stimulus" has failed. Resolutely failed.
There are less jobs being lost each month because there are not that many
jobs being done. Show us a chart of the real unemployment.

Good God... it's a mirror of what Bush caused. You really need to stop
listening to Rush.

There's a recovery underway. It may not be strong, it might not even be
sustainable. We'll have to wait and see, but to deny reality....

FYI, it's fewer jobs being loss, not less jobs being lost, but you got it
right fewer jobs are being lost. Yes, there are people dropping off the
unemployment roles and are no longer being counted. Yes, the unemployment
numbers are worse because of this fact, but the rate of job loss is slowing.
Just about all economists agree that the job situation isn't getting worse
but getting better.

The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

On 3/9/10 6:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.


I would not dispute that there are many on the "wealthy right" who would
like to totally destroy the "worker class" in this country so they can
build a new worker class willing to work for peanuts, with virtually no
benefits...ala the Wal-Mart model. They'd like nothing better than a
return here to 19th Century employer-employee relationships, where the
employees are no better off than workers in China and much of the rest
of the Pacific Rim, India, Africa, and Central America. The wealthy
right, after all, doesn't think it is wealthy enough.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional
writer, and we have standards.

On 3/9/10 9:33 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional writer,
and we have standards.


Spoofer active again...too bad for rec.boats.


--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:47:44 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up?

-cheap labor
-to reinforce the fact they're rich and can do it

Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.

gee. look at mexico. why would 10 or 15 families rule the country
while tens of millions live in poverty?

you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:47:44 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.
yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.
Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up?

-cheap labor
-to reinforce the fact they're rich and can do it

Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.

gee. look at mexico. why would 10 or 15 families rule the country
while tens of millions live in poverty?

you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?


You have quite an imagination.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:30:21 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:


you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?


You have quite an imagination.

and you have no information except the fairy tales of the right