On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown)

John H

On 3/8/10 8:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:


om wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?



Herring doesn't like it when posters respond to those he doesn't like.
He actually believes he is in charge of something. snerk

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Incompetent troll.


I think Nincdepoop has called everyone in the group a liar...except Harry, of
course.

First of all I would note that I snipped almost 400 lines of headers and "you
lied", "no you lied" and still the message loses nothing As to Plum, why
would she mess with the fat brother in the cellar?

Scotty

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing, no crybabies!

On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch



Indeed it is.

On 3/8/10 8:41 AM, I am Tosk wrote:



Incompetent troll.


I think Nincdepoop has called everyone in the group a liar...except Harry, of
course.

First of all I would note that I snipped almost 400 lines of headers and "you
lied", "no you lied" and still the message loses nothing As to Plum, why
would she mess with the fat brother in the cellar?

Scotty



Paid that hospital bill yet, Mr. "I can't get a job"?

On Mar 8, 8:46*am, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"John *wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, *wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. *I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. * I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 8, 8:46 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:





"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.


Poor Loogy. You have about as much ability to convince or enforce as
herring, which is to say, none at all.

You're an asshole, loogy.

In article ,
says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

I beg to differ... Most here have filtered the idiots who annoy us, out. We
(especially Tim) have been making on topic posts and responding to them. We
still have a couple who insist in talking to Harry's room-mate, but really,
they are easy to ignore too.

Scotty

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing, no crybabies!

On Mar 8, 9:08*am, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 8, 8:46 am, *wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"John * *wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, * *wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. *I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. * I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

Poor Loogy. You have about as much ability to convince or enforce as
herring, which is to say, none at all.

You're an asshole, loogy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And you're such a loser that you have to lie about every aspect of
your miserable life, fat ass.