On Mar 8, 10:53*am, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 10:30 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 8, 9:25 am, *wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 8, 8:46 am, * *wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"John * * *wrote in message
om...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, * * *wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. *I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. * I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

BTW, if you are so upset by what you believe to be libelous or
slanderous statements about you, you should be reluctant to make
libelous or slanderous remarks about others.

I'd bet your "lawyer" is unaware of the *fact* that you are one of the
major name callers, libelers and slanderers in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy...... YOU have stated that *I* broke my daughter's arms.
That is a CRIME, and if you have, by stating that, and withholding
apparent evidence of such, broken the law. Do I care? No, not really,
if you weren't the nastiest, boorish, lying piece of **** that you
are, I'd probably not do anything. But, seeing how it's not costing me
hardly anything, it'll be worth it having you subpeonaed, facing you
in court in my county, etc.

Go tell it to the mountain, asshole.

So, let me get this straight:

Your *private* lawyer is going to prosecute me in a criminal court in
your area? I ask because the other day when I asked why I hadn't heard
from your local sheriff, you said your lawyer was "handling" it.

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, man you are stupid!!! My answer, if I have to dumb it down so that
even you can understand it, meant, why would the Sheriff contact me,
when my attorney is handling it, dumb ass?

On 3/8/10 12:31 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 8, 10:53 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 10:30 AM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Mar 8, 9:25 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 9:04 AM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Mar 8, 8:46 am, wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:37 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"John wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:

Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

Indeed it is.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then leave, fat ass.

BTW, if you are so upset by what you believe to be libelous or
slanderous statements about you, you should be reluctant to make
libelous or slanderous remarks about others.

I'd bet your "lawyer" is unaware of the *fact* that you are one of the
major name callers, libelers and slanderers in rec.boats.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pssst, dummy...... YOU have stated that *I* broke my daughter's arms.
That is a CRIME, and if you have, by stating that, and withholding
apparent evidence of such, broken the law. Do I care? No, not really,
if you weren't the nastiest, boorish, lying piece of **** that you
are, I'd probably not do anything. But, seeing how it's not costing me
hardly anything, it'll be worth it having you subpeonaed, facing you
in court in my county, etc.

Go tell it to the mountain, asshole.

So, let me get this straight:

Your *private* lawyer is going to prosecute me in a criminal court in
your area? I ask because the other day when I asked why I hadn't heard
from your local sheriff, you said your lawyer was "handling" it.

:)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, man you are stupid!!! My answer, if I have to dumb it down so that
even you can understand it, meant, why would the Sheriff contact me,
when my attorney is handling it, dumb ass?


Your private attorney is handling your alleged criminal case?
Really?

On 3/8/2010 12:29 PM, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 12:22 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/8/2010 11:50 AM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch


If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

It isn't the spoofers that ruined rec.boats, it is all the obnoxious
****z, that post here. They turn every thread into a political post. I
have been telling everyone for years that rec.boats was a disaster and
was on it's death bed. All I have done is try to speed up the process.


How rich...one of the spoofing assholes claiming his spoofing isn't
ruining what is left of rec.boats...

Nice try, asshole.

You asshole spoofing ****z, I, Harry Krause, has been saying for years
that rec.boats was a disaster, that it was useless to discuss boating
topics. I, Harry Krause, have said the only reason I ever come to
rec.boats is to stir up **** with the right wing trouble makers. If
you don't remember that, then you are one of the new spoofers who just
showed up to rec.boats.

HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 12:22 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/8/2010 11:50 AM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch


If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

It isn't the spoofers that ruined rec.boats, it is all the obnoxious
****z, that post here. They turn every thread into a political post. I
have been telling everyone for years that rec.boats was a disaster and
was on it's death bed. All I have done is try to speed up the process.


How rich...one of the spoofing assholes claiming his spoofing isn't
ruining what is left of rec.boats...

Nice try, asshole.

Florida Jim, Eisboch's pal, along with a few others, are obsessed with
you. They live and breathe by your every utterance.
Scotty, Tim, Greg, Wayne, and John are really the only ones capable of
ignoring you when they want to.
You may have noticed that Richard, Tom and Gene left because Florida Jim
started the spoofing cascade, not because of you.
I suspect people with a touch of class can't tolerate being spoofed.
It's a filthy business.
They have no problem handling assholes. Talking about you there.
The spoofers only prove there are worse assholes than you.
And drive most decent comment away.

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Oh, except that he never said what his patent was about. So, typing
William McKee patent in google isn't going to find it. See my comment
about you being a fool for additional information.

Oh, and you're a bozo also.

Right. And you're the incompetent patent attorney.
I don't know Bill, and disagree with many of his opinions.
Don't even read all of his posts.
But he has mentioned his disk drive patent more than once here.
Even in this very thread.
Your pettiness has cost you all credibility.
Go soak you head. Or talk to Cannuck.


Nope... he didn't in the original thread wherein he claimed to me that he
was a patent holder. You said you don't read all of his posts, yet you're
all of a sudden an authority on them.

Don't care what you think about my "credibility."

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 3/8/10 1:09 PM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 12:22 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/8/2010 11:50 AM, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and
in others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch


If that's true, you can thank your spoofing friend Jim for driving the
last nail into the coffin lid.
His spoofing of Harry and anybody he can use to get at Harry opened the
spoofing floodgates.
So be it.
Take solace in that a pal is more important than any newsgroup.

It isn't the spoofers that ruined rec.boats, it is all the obnoxious
****z, that post here. They turn every thread into a political post. I
have been telling everyone for years that rec.boats was a disaster and
was on it's death bed. All I have done is try to speed up the process.


How rich...one of the spoofing assholes claiming his spoofing isn't
ruining what is left of rec.boats...

Nice try, asshole.

Florida Jim, Eisboch's pal, along with a few others, are obsessed with
you. They live and breathe by your every utterance.
Scotty, Tim, Greg, Wayne, and John are really the only ones capable of
ignoring you when they want to.
You may have noticed that Richard, Tom and Gene left because Florida Jim
started the spoofing cascade, not because of you.
I suspect people with a touch of class can't tolerate being spoofed.
It's a filthy business.
They have no problem handling assholes. Talking about you there.
The spoofers only prove there are worse assholes than you.
And drive most decent comment away.





Well, whichever spoofer you are, I don't disagree that flajim and a
"few" others are obsessed with me. But that list also includes Scott
Ingersoll and John Herring. Ingersoll and Loogy are tied as Dumbest
Posters in Rec.Boats, and Herring, of course, is the ranking Rec.Boats
hypocrite.

I don't agree with Tim's point-of-view on most subjects, but I think
he's a perfectly fine fellow. Wayne does nothing for me...he's just a
blowhard, but a harmless one. I do miss Gene and ol' Eisboch.

Now, you can resume one of your other ID's here.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent
attorneys were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for
the buyer, the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of
two days with them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that
they do.

What was the bad experience? The exhaustive process? Unfortunately, if you
don't go through that process these days, your patent will either be denied
or can be subverted.


We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I
was getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started
going through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was
on the patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the
attorney hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything
similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By
8 pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the
stack of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I
called for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them
was going to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the
closing would have to be postponed to a later date because we still had a
pile of papers to go through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces,
picked up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases.
They then announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be
any patent conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch

It sounds like there's a bunch of missing information, but it's hard to
tell. In any case, you got your stuff done? Good for you.

It's one of the reasons I got out of doing for companies... too much trouble
with engineers/scientists.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"HK" wrote in message
m...
On 3/8/10 8:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:


om wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the
list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than
mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent
attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the
buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days
with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I
was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers,
accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this
will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two
patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started
going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on
the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the
attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen.
By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the
stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I
called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was
going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would
have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to
go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces,
picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They
then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?



Herring doesn't like it when posters respond to those he doesn't like.
He actually believes he is in charge of something. snerk


Yeah, but he likes to look at Sarah Palin!


--
Nom=de=Plume

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H



Nope. I've lost track of who's who in this newsgroup. I really just
quickly browse the headers once in a while.

Rec.boats is wrecked.

Eisboch

I beg to differ... Most here have filtered the idiots who annoy us, out.
We
(especially Tim) have been making on topic posts and responding to them.
We
still have a couple who insist in talking to Harry's room-mate, but
really,
they are easy to ignore too.

Scotty

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing, no crybabies!


Still waiting for you to filter me out...

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 3/8/10 1:37 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
m...
On 3/8/10 8:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:


om wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the
list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than
mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent
attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the
buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days
with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I
was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers,
accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this
will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two
patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started
going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on
the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the
attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen.
By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the
stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I
called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was
going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would
have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to
go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces,
picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They
then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?



Herring doesn't like it when posters respond to those he doesn't like.
He actually believes he is in charge of something.snerk


Yeah, but he likes to look at Sarah Palin!


Well, there's a reason. I'd tell you what it is, but I don't have your
email.. :)