On Jan 26, 3:35*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:09*pm, Harry wrote:



On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Stalking proof, right in that statement. Boy, you are a dumb****.
Sniffing to much Racing Fuel, Kevin Noble?????

On 1/26/10 5:30 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:35 pm, wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:09 pm, wrote:



On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Stalking proof, right in that statement. Boy, you are a dumb****.
Sniffing to much Racing Fuel, Kevin Noble?????


In a previous post, loogy claimed a buddy of his was doing the stalking,
and had been by at least twice to size up and take photos for him. I
believe that would qualify as "stalking."

On Jan 26, 5:37*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 5:30 PM, *e#c wrote:





On Jan 26, 3:35 pm, *wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:09 pm, *wrote:

On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, * *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Stalking proof, right in that statement. Boy, you are a dumb****.
Sniffing to much Racing Fuel, Kevin Noble?????

In a previous post, loogy claimed a buddy of his was doing the stalking,
and had been by at least twice to size up and take photos for him. I
believe that would qualify as "stalking."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Where did I "claim" anybody was "stalking" you, asswipe? If someone
takes a picture of your house from a public street they are "stalking"
you? Those *******s at Zillow and Google Earth better get ready for
you own their companies huh...BWAAHAAA!!!!

On Jan 26, 5:30*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:35*pm, Loogypicker wrote:





On Jan 26, 3:09*pm, Harry wrote:

On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Stalking proof, right in that statement. Boy, you are a dumb****.
Sniffing to much Racing Fuel, Kevin Noble?????- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good gawd you're ignorant!!!