Airplane Security
 

On 12/27/09 10:45 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:18:04 -0500, Jim wrote:


Obama sure knows how to pick em.

The plane was loaded in Amsterdam. Frankly, I don't see how Nepolitano
had a whole hell of a lot to do with it.

Stop confusing the morons.

Airplane Security
 

On 12/27/09 10:48 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:44:25 -0500, Harry wrote:


Wait until the teabaggers start blowing up buildings, planes, and crowds
of people.

Yeah, but that wouldn't be terrorism. That would be patriotism, if I
understand the teabaggers correctly.


i'd be interested in seeing the links between the teabaggers and the
KKK. The teabaggers include a large number of latino haters, and, of
course, so does the KKK.

Maybe herring knows. He's a self-outed hater of latinos and blacks, and
a teabagger sympathizer.

Airplane Security
 

On 27/12/2009 8:39 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:05:55 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:


I don't make them up. How many air plane incidents in say the last 10
years involve other than young male islam/muslims?

Never heard of the Black Widows?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahidka

Don't give me the hate group nonsense. If I am looking for terrorists I
am not going to be wearing a turbin padding down an eldery white nun
living 30 years in Arkansas I am going to get no where.

Profiling has had some successes with single individuals. When you are
talking of a terrorist organization, it will just look for whackos that
don't fit the profile. By the way, Mohammed Atta doesn't fit your
profile. He was 33.

Looks like Ruskies have some fiesty and deadly women. Did they do a US
airliner?

33, he would fit. I said young, not kids... say 14 to 40.

I never claimed profiling will get them all, just a method of spending
20% of the resources for 80% of the effect. Then you have 80% of the
resources to go after 20% that remain. Increases the odds of being
effective.

And add all terrorist groups, even domestic skin heads.

Airplane Security
 

On 27/12/2009 8:40 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:09 pm, wrote:
On 27/12/2009 4:35 PM, Tom Francis wrote:

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

What say you fliers?

Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano.

"DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt
to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that
“the system worked.”

What a clueless wench. More like the idiot got nervious when mixing the
chemicals and messed up on his lap. Hope he burned his balls. But luck
had more to do with it. It wasn't time to die for the people on board.

But the plane landed safely, so the system had to work, eh?

One has to ask how the system made a difference.

He got on the plane right past authorities with an explosive compound.
It was his mistakes, not the governments actions that saved the day.
Because even if you were willing to die, I doubt seriously you would
want to fry your balls first.

Airplane Security
 

On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:56:02 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

I never claimed profiling will get them all, just a method of spending
20% of the resources for 80% of the effect. Then you have 80% of the
resources to go after 20% that remain. Increases the odds of being
effective.

That is exactly one of the problems with profiling. You don't spend 20%
of the resources. You spend 80% of the resources, and ignore all the
rest. Put two people on an airplane, one a young Muslim man, the other
an older white woman. The woman is carrying the bomb. While all the
airport security focuses on the young Muslim man, the woman slips on
board.

Airplane Security
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 7:36 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 27, 6:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a
chill pill.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Of course, D'Plume, you should know what "mis-speaking" is. You do so
quite regularly here.

I'd rather mis-speak vs. mis-think, which seems to be your forte.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But D'Plume. You love me and you know it!


I guess it'll have to be unrequited.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Airplane Security
 

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:18:04 -0500, Jim wrote:


Obama sure knows how to pick em.

The plane was loaded in Amsterdam. Frankly, I don't see how Nepolitano
had a whole hell of a lot to do with it.


She was supposed to be at the gate at all times! (Obviously she didn't learn
from the gate-crasher incidend.)

--
Nom=de=Plume

Airplane Security
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 8:40 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 27, 9:09 pm, wrote:
On 27/12/2009 4:35 PM, Tom Francis wrote:

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote:

What say you fliers?

Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano.

"DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt
to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that
“the system worked.”

What a clueless wench. More like the idiot got nervious when mixing the
chemicals and messed up on his lap. Hope he burned his balls. But luck
had more to do with it. It wasn't time to die for the people on board.

But the plane landed safely, so the system had to work, eh?

One has to ask how the system made a difference.

He got on the plane right past authorities with an explosive compound. It
was his mistakes, not the governments actions that saved the day. Because
even if you were willing to die, I doubt seriously you would want to fry
your balls first.



Ok, that was funny. In any case she was talking about after the incident
started. Perhaps we should see what the investigations show? Nah... just
blame Obama.


--
Nom=de=Plume

Airplane Security
 

Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 10:45 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:18:04 -0500, Jim wrote:


Obama sure knows how to pick em.

The plane was loaded in Amsterdam. Frankly, I don't see how Nepolitano
had a whole hell of a lot to do with it.

Stop confusing the morons.

Nepolitano is one example of Obama's bad judgement.
--

It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me.

Airplane Security
 

Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 10:48 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:44:25 -0500, Harry wrote:


Wait until the teabaggers start blowing up buildings, planes, and crowds
of people.

Yeah, but that wouldn't be terrorism. That would be patriotism, if I
understand the teabaggers correctly.


i'd be interested in seeing the links between the teabaggers and the
KKK. The teabaggers include a large number of latino haters, and, of
course, so does the KKK.

Maybe herring knows. He's a self-outed hater of latinos and blacks, and
a teabagger sympathizer.





Well there you go. You have made a connection. Write your congressman or
Napolitano. I'm sure they'd be interested in your theories.

--

It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me.