![]() |
Airplane Security
Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties?
They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic |
Airplane Security
Vic Smith wrote:
Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic Don't think I could stand that much adventure. :) |
Airplane Security
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I'd rather die see some people naked. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic Just issue everybody a weapon. Knifes preferred. Think someone will risk ****ing off all those knife wielders? |
Airplane Security
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I'd rather die see some people naked. Specifics please. Maybe we can help. -- It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me. |
Airplane Security
Bill McKee wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic Just issue everybody a weapon. Knifes preferred. Think someone will risk ****ing off all those knife wielders? Ever notice how whacko's always choose gun free zones to do their mischief? |
Airplane Security
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:24:10 -0500, Jim wrote:
Ever notice how whacko's always choose gun free zones to do their mischief? Yeah, like the whacko that shot the four police officers in Washington state? Or, the whacko that killed all those people at Ft. Hood? Gun free, my ass. Whackos choose whatever venue that will give them the highest profile. This last whacko, you'll note, was willing to go down with the plane. I don't think his dying was a consideration to him. |
Airplane Security
"Vic Smith" wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic Or, TSA could pay attention to the no fly list and not let the jerk on board in the first place. They may be too busy checking to make sure your 3 oz. shampoo bottle is properly secured in it's 1 qt. anti- terrorist ziplock bag to be bothered with a heads up from the Brits. TSA is a poor substitute for security. It's been crap since it was set up and not likely to get better. I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). |
Airplane Security
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote:
I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn |
Airplane Security
On 26/12/2009 8:40 PM, Vic Smith wrote:
Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? No one wants to see that unless you are on a plane full of chear leaders. They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. And crap on the seat. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I have a better idea. Profiling. Single, muslim/islamic, male single or in packs of up to 5 or 6. Born in Africa or the middle east. Full body x-ray or no boarding. Life at Gitmo if anything hazardous is found and convicted. |
Airplane Security
On 27/12/2009 8:01 AM, mmc wrote:
"Vic wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic Or, TSA could pay attention to the no fly list and not let the jerk on board in the first place. They may be too busy checking to make sure your 3 oz. shampoo bottle is properly secured in it's 1 qt. anti- terrorist ziplock bag to be bothered with a heads up from the Brits. TSA is a poor substitute for security. It's been crap since it was set up and not likely to get better. I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Give Fed-Ex a multi-billion dollar contract. Seriously. Fed-Ex can track a package moving around the world in seconds with a certian high degree of accuracy. The US goverment with trillions can't track its own people to know you or I have lived peacefully in a relatively stationary lifestyle for however long we have been alive and moved to or from. Profiling, couldn't agree more. This single muslim young male should have been pegged for a good roust right off the bat. And if muslim and islamic mostly young males don't like it, consider the facts that muslims haven't been doing much to let others knwo of pending violence. And I really doubt these idiots operate without support, without family, without money... Take the place this recent perp rented in London...it wasn't exactly a cheap place to stay. Could have been a cover... would love to know where he got money to live on. |
Airplane Security
"thunder" wrote in message
t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Sure is easy to start down the slippery slope of racism and bigotry isn't it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 26/12/2009 8:40 PM, Vic Smith wrote: Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? No one wants to see that unless you are on a plane full of chear leaders. They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. And crap on the seat. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I have a better idea. Profiling. Single, muslim/islamic, male single or in packs of up to 5 or 6. Born in Africa or the middle east. Full body x-ray or no boarding. Life at Gitmo if anything hazardous is found and convicted. You're an idiot if you think that would work. See thunder's post. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
On 12/27/09 1:23 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Sure is easy to start down the slippery slope of racism and bigotry isn't it. Adam is the result of 'christian' home schooling and therefore was preprogrammed for simplemindedness before al qaeda got to him. :) |
Airplane Security
wrote in message
... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:23:26 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "thunder" wrote in message net... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Sure is easy to start down the slippery slope of racism and bigotry isn't it. I suppose we could adopt the FDR model and lock up everyone with a middle eastern name. ;-) Great example of that slippery slope... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
On 12/27/09 2:18 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:23:26 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Sure is easy to start down the slippery slope of racism and bigotry isn't it. I suppose we could adopt the FDR model and lock up everyone with a middle eastern name. ;-) Great example of that slippery slope... I'd start with the teabaggers. On the other hand, and on another but connected subject, I'm not sure it would be a bad idea to shut down immigration to this country entirely until actual unemployment drops below 5%. |
Airplane Security
"thunder" wrote in message t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn No one said profiling would catch all the bad guys but if the threat is from a people from a specific ethnic group, deliberately ignoring people from that group because of "political correctness" is it's own kind of crazy. If my neighborhood was experiencing a rash of buglaries and the suspects, based on prior arrests, were teenage anglo males, would I be incorrect in being aware of this and watching people that fit that description? Is it ok to profile white people? |
Airplane Security
On 27/12/2009 9:25 AM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Given time, inginuity anyone can slip through. Given we don't have the resources to pollygraph every flyer with an intensive background check, no mater what one does it is going to boil down to getting most of them most of the time. Adam Yahiye Gadahn would have matched young male muslim/islam. One Timothy McVeigh and how many muslim/islamic nut cases? |
Airplane Security
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 27/12/2009 9:25 AM, thunder wrote: On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:01:14 -0500, mmc wrote: I know the libs will squeal at this but mayube a little racial profiling is in order? Like, check out people with obviously Muslim names a little more closely than pasty white "Bubba Joe Smith" from Texarkana (apologies if Bubba Joe actually resides on this group). Yup, racial profiling would have caught Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber. If you want to use terrorist profiling, fine, but concentrate on racial profiling the true terrorists can slip through. Guys, like this, for instance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yahiye_Gadahn Given time, inginuity anyone can slip through. Given we don't have the resources to pollygraph every flyer with an intensive background check, no mater what one does it is going to boil down to getting most of them most of the time. Adam Yahiye Gadahn would have matched young male muslim/islam. One Timothy McVeigh and how many muslim/islamic nut cases? http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/26/hat...ort/index.html -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
"thunder" wrote in message t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:24:10 -0500, Jim wrote: Ever notice how whacko's always choose gun free zones to do their mischief? Yeah, like the whacko that shot the four police officers in Washington state? Or, the whacko that killed all those people at Ft. Hood? Gun free, my ass. Whackos choose whatever venue that will give them the highest profile. This last whacko, you'll note, was willing to go down with the plane. I don't think his dying was a consideration to him. Actually Ft. Hood is a gun free zone as long as you are not at the range, etc. |
Airplane Security
|
Airplane Security
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "thunder" wrote in message t... On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:24:10 -0500, Jim wrote: Ever notice how whacko's always choose gun free zones to do their mischief? Yeah, like the whacko that shot the four police officers in Washington state? Or, the whacko that killed all those people at Ft. Hood? Gun free, my ass. Whackos choose whatever venue that will give them the highest profile. This last whacko, you'll note, was willing to go down with the plane. I don't think his dying was a consideration to him. Actually Ft. Hood is a gun free zone as long as you are not at the range, etc. Interesting. I wonder why the military thought it was important to have a gun free zone on a military base. Perhaps in the vast majority of cases it makes better sense. Of course, there's the issue of "military intelligence." Aren't handguns called weapons by the military? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith
wrote: What say you fliers? Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano. "DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that “the system worked.” Asked by CNN’s Candy Crowley on “State of the Union” how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: “We’re asking the same questions.” Let me see if I got this right - an admitted jihadist, father warned DHS and FBI, he got on a flight with explosives and injectable ignitor fluid, was on a watch list and still got a visa, almost set one of the devices off, was subdued by the passengers until landing. Yep - the system worked alright - perfectly if you live in Obamaland where everything is a B+ effort and George Orwell is your language expert. You know - I'm normally incredulous about some of the things that politicians say and do because most of them are morons, but this is so outrageous, it's incomprehensible. She needs to be fired and fired now. That's twice under her watch something has gone hideously wrong on an air plane and passengers have had to take action. |
Airplane Security
|
Airplane Security
On 12/27/09 6:35 PM, Tom Francis wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: What say you fliers? Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano. "DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that “the system worked.” Asked by CNN’s Candy Crowley on “State of the Union” how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: “We’re asking the same questions.” Let me see if I got this right - an admitted jihadist, father warned DHS and FBI, he got on a flight with explosives and injectable ignitor fluid, was on a watch list and still got a visa, almost set one of the devices off, was subdued by the passengers until landing. Yep - the system worked alright - perfectly if you live in Obamaland where everything is a B+ effort and George Orwell is your language expert. You know - I'm normally incredulous about some of the things that politicians say and do because most of them are morons, but this is so outrageous, it's incomprehensible. She needs to be fired and fired now. That's twice under her watch something has gone hideously wrong on an air plane and passengers have had to take action. No one in charge of anything gives a **** what you think, lawntractor man. |
Airplane Security
"Tom Francis" wrote in message
... On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: What say you fliers? Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano. "DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that "the system worked." Asked by CNN's Candy Crowley on "State of the Union" how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: "We're asking the same questions." Let me see if I got this right - an admitted jihadist, father warned DHS and FBI, he got on a flight with explosives and injectable ignitor fluid, was on a watch list and still got a visa, almost set one of the devices off, was subdued by the passengers until landing. Yep - the system worked alright - perfectly if you live in Obamaland where everything is a B+ effort and George Orwell is your language expert. You know - I'm normally incredulous about some of the things that politicians say and do because most of them are morons, but this is so outrageous, it's incomprehensible. She needs to be fired and fired now. That's twice under her watch something has gone hideously wrong on an air plane and passengers have had to take action. She was talking about the reaction after there was a security breach. The plane landed safely. Additional safety measures are being put in place, something that should have been done during the last administration. This has been a known problem for quite a while. If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Vic wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I'd rather die see some people naked. In my best dumb Donnie impression.... Say...what? |
Airplane Security
nom=de=plume wrote:
She was talking about the reaction after there was a security breach. The plane landed safely. Additional safety measures are being put in place, something that should have been done during the last administration. This has been a known problem for quite a while. If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. "Additional safety measures are being put in place, something that should have been done during the last administration. This has been a known problem for quite a while." Really? Got a cite for that one? No? Of course you don't. |
Airplane Security
On Dec 27, 6:23*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 6:35 PM, Tom Francis wrote: On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith *wrote: What say you fliers? Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano. "DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that the system worked. Asked by CNN s Candy Crowley on State of the Union how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: We re asking the same questions. Let me see if I got this right - an admitted jihadist, father warned DHS and FBI, he got on a flight with explosives and injectable ignitor fluid, was on a watch list and still got a visa, almost set one of the devices off, was subdued by the passengers until landing. Yep - the system worked alright - perfectly if you *live in Obamaland where everything is a B+ effort and George Orwell is your language expert. You know - I'm normally incredulous about some of the things that politicians say and do because most of them are morons, but this is so outrageous, it's incomprehensible. She needs to be fired and fired now. *That's twice under her watch something has gone hideously wrong on an air plane and passengers have had to take action. No one in charge of anything gives a **** what you think, lawntractor man.. Herr Krause. Is this a reason you support Napolitano with such zeal? With no irony you think on the same wave as she. http://www.getliberty.org/content_im...0%28600%29.jpg |
Airplane Security
On Dec 27, 6:25*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. -- Nom=de=Plume Of course, D'Plume, you should know what "mis-speaking" is. You do so quite regularly here. |
Airplane Security
On 12/27/09 7:54 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. I'm not german, **** for brains. |
Airplane Security
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Dec 27, 6:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. -- Nom=de=Plume Of course, D'Plume, you should know what "mis-speaking" is. You do so quite regularly here. I'd rather mis-speak vs. mis-think, which seems to be your forte. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Airplane Security
On Dec 27, 7:36*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 6:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. -- Nom=de=Plume Of course, D'Plume, you should know what "mis-speaking" is. You do so quite regularly here. I'd rather mis-speak vs. mis-think, which seems to be your forte. -- Nom=de=Plume But D'Plume. You love me and you know it! |
Airplane Security
On Dec 27, 7:08*pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 7:54 PM, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. I'm not german, **** for brains. I know, Herr Krause. You are German. |
Airplane Security
On 12/27/09 9:10 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 27, 7:08 pm, wrote: On 12/27/09 7:54 PM, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. I'm not german, **** for brains. I know, Herr Krause. You are German. Moron. |
Airplane Security
Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 7:54 PM, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. I'm not german, **** for brains. Although it is not difficult to imagine why he thought I was German. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krause -- It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me. |
Airplane Security
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tom Francis" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:40:14 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: What say you fliers? Have to ask Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano. "DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the thwarting of the attempt to blow up the Amsterdam-Detroit flight this week demonstrated that "the system worked." Asked by CNN's Candy Crowley on "State of the Union" how that could be possible when the young Nigerian who sought to set off the bomb was able to smuggle explosive liquid onto the flight, Napolitano responded: "We're asking the same questions." Let me see if I got this right - an admitted jihadist, father warned DHS and FBI, he got on a flight with explosives and injectable ignitor fluid, was on a watch list and still got a visa, almost set one of the devices off, was subdued by the passengers until landing. Yep - the system worked alright - perfectly if you live in Obamaland where everything is a B+ effort and George Orwell is your language expert. You know - I'm normally incredulous about some of the things that politicians say and do because most of them are morons, but this is so outrageous, it's incomprehensible. She needs to be fired and fired now. That's twice under her watch something has gone hideously wrong on an air plane and passengers have had to take action. She was talking about the reaction after there was a security breach. The plane landed safely. Additional safety measures are being put in place, something that should have been done during the last administration. This has been a known problem for quite a while. If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. Mis-speaking is akin to fabricating and lying. Hillery was caught mis-speaking. Remember? -- It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me. |
Airplane Security
TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 27, 7:36 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 6:25 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If anything, she's guilty of mis-speaking, so you should probably take a chill pill. -- Nom=de=Plume Of course, D'Plume, you should know what "mis-speaking" is. You do so quite regularly here. I'd rather mis-speak vs. mis-think, which seems to be your forte. -- Nom=de=Plume But D'Plume. You love me and you know it! D'Plume gets a woodie when she/he/it dreams about you. Don't take this the wrong way Bassie. ;-) |
Airplane Security
Rob wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Vic wrote in message ... Why not just make flyers strip and issue hospital gowns and booties? They can pick up their clothes at the arrival point. What's the big deal? They can modify the hospital gowns so your ass isn't in the wind. Maybe go to a trousers and shirt kind. Let everybody carry 20 bucks aboard to buy stuff from the plane gedunk in case they just have to have a Snickers or a Coca-Cola. Crew can organize prayer sessions (multi-denomination), group sing-alongs and charade games to keep folks busy while in the air. Those who want to can just watch a movie. What's the problem here? Why aren't they doing this? No more long security waits at the airport, and you can reduce costs by eliminating most of the TSA personnel. Be more fun flying too. An adventure every time. Looks doable to me. I must add though, that I don't fly. What say you fliers? --Vic I'd rather die see some people naked. In my best dumb Donnie impression.... Say...what? Good job. You get to be the stand in while he's away. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com