Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. |
#42
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "jps" wrote in message .. . Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. |
#43
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message . .. Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. |
#44
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#45
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong. |
#46
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. It is my opinion, shared by many others by the way, that you are a narcissistic dip****. -- Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using someone else's ID |
#47
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:11:49 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong. That's why I only state facts. I've determined that the fact that you're a pothead is a fact. I cite your posts as evidence. |
#48
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message om... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong. Here's a fact: You're arguing something for the sake of the argument. Opinion = "a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty" Get a life Bill. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#49
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:7ip0i59an8gi9r2brkqs2qf55or6oovh5f@4ax. com... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong. Here's a fact: You're arguing something for the sake of the argument. Opinion = "a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty" Get a life Bill. -- Nom=de=Plume Me get a life? You are the one arguing an opinon is never wrong. |
#50
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "jps" wrote in message ... On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:37:47 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... Is that your excuse? I don't use excuses. I'm trying to understand how your brain, which appears to intermittently function, can come to the simple-minded conclusions that show up in your posts. I've concluded you must be a pothead. And you are wrong about that, just like you are wrong in most of your opinions. But I'm just like you in that I think my opinions are facts. So, based on that, you're surely a pothead. Another wrong opinion. You can't have a "wrong" opinion. You can have a misguided opinion, but an opinion can't be right or wrong, at least not in the context of your argument. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, your opinion can be 100% wrong. Here's a fact: You're arguing something for the sake of the argument. Opinion = "a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty" Get a life Bill. -- Nom=de=Plume Me get a life? You are the one arguing an opinon is never wrong. Wouldn't you think a smart, pretty, young girl could find something better to do besides glideing around usenet talking with dirty old men and attempting to put them down. And she wonders why she can't scare up a date. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thune Amendment | General | |||
Are you a Democrat, Republican or Southern Republican? | General | |||
Ship captain's Second Amendment rights upheld | ASA | |||
Democrat, Republican or Southern Republican? | ASA | |||
Reagan's own words on Second Amendment | ASA |