H the K wrote:
On 11/5/09 5:18 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:48:24 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...
wrote in message

Look at what the non union successful car companies are paying
and
a
valid market rate is less than that.
Huh? Non union car companies not paying a valid market rate?
How do
you
figure that one?

--
Nom=de=Plume

They pay less, have less onerous work rules, and would pay even
less, if
the unions were not getting a bunch from the bankrupt companies and
taxpayers.
So, the non-union car companies pay a valid market rate, which is
fine if
you can convince the workers to get rid of the union. It doesn't
happen
that often, but I have no problem with it per se.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Basically the non union shops pay the workers enough and will
build a
plant
somewhere else if they need more capacity if the shop goes union.


The Plum finally took a stool softener. Now for the hard part. Back
peddling.

I think Plum is an agitator sent here to agitate. I don't know why any
of you engage her in conversation, she is just a somewhat polite Harry
Krause.

The politeness is rapidly disappearing. She's become a regular HK
wannabee.


Well, I hope you've plonked me by now.



The tribe of Right Wing Lost Boys here cannot tolerate dissent. They're
probably discussing you on their secret site.

I don't think I've seen mention of you or la Plum over there. Sorry to
disappoint. Does Karen know you have this thing going on here? She
probably wouldn't give a **** anyway.