"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
H the K wrote:

What? Nom is not your real name? I'm crushed.

The rightie trash here is ****ed with me because I won't even take a
sip of their kool aid, I think their political, emotional and societal
underpinnings are slime, and I'm never afraid to say so.

You read it Wafa. Probably some of your potential clients do too.
That's sure to be good for business.

And if you weren't such a dip****, you'd trim your posts once in a
while.


Hey! When I did that, I got slammed for it. Double-standard?

When you did what?
Or are we supposed do a Carnac routine on that ditzy mind of yours?


Please don't confuse her with Ditzy Dan.
She could best 10 of his ilk.


I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:


I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I
was responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times
and retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and
folks time. I hope that makes sense to you.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I was
responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times and
retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and folks
time. I hope that makes sense to you.


So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it seems
like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:46:09 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:

So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it seems
like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for it.

John doesn't make the rules for Usenet. The more he's ignored, the
better the group runs. He only posts here to cover up the voices in his
head.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I was
responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times and
retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and folks
time. I hope that makes sense to you.


So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it seems
like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for it.

I give up. You're hopeless. Are you a blonde?

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I
was responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times
and retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and
folks time. I hope that makes sense to you.


So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it
seems like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for
it.

I give up. You're hopeless. Are you a blonde?


Don't give up. You're not hopeless. No, sadly, I'm not a blonde.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I
was responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times
and retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and
folks time. I hope that makes sense to you.

So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it
seems like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for
it.

I give up. You're hopeless. Are you a blonde?


Don't give up. You're not hopeless. No, sadly, I'm not a blonde.


WAFA just lost his last erection...

"Roger 1" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I
was responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several
times and retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of
bandwidth and folks time. I hope that makes sense to you.

So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it
seems like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me
for it.

I give up. You're hopeless. Are you a blonde?


Don't give up. You're not hopeless. No, sadly, I'm not a blonde.


WAFA just lost his last erection...


TMI

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:04:19 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I trimmed some posts and one of "them" slammed me for it. I guess Jim
doesn't remember.

Notice that I left enough information to let you know what the heck I was
responding to. Lots of times threads change direction several times and
retaining all the superfluous **** is just wasteful of bandwidth and folks
time. I hope that makes sense to you.


So, does that mean one should or shouldn't trim posts? Like I said, it seems
like a double-standard... believe it was John who chastised me for it.

I give up. You're hopeless. Are you a blonde?

Careful, sounds like Jim's using one of his best usenet pickup lines.

It's been a while since his last date.

"jps" wrote in message
...

Careful, sounds like Jim's using one of his best usenet pickup lines.

It's been a while since his last date.



....and for good reason!