"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative
for sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping
the ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too
late in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR
money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?


I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are wrong.
Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.


Really? What information? Please be specific. I'd like to know how you know
how much I make, paid in taxes, or donated, plus the number of hours of time
I've committed over the last, say 10 years. Or, feel free to highlight your
charity.


--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They don't
really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for this
country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal conservative
for sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more of
ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping
the ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved too
late in the process. I don't see those on the radical right honestly
evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush, Wilson,
Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in name or in
fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing YOUR
money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you think?

I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious time.
I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to tell me
otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are wrong.
Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.


Really? What information? Please be specific. I'd like to know how you know
how much I make, paid in taxes, or donated, plus the number of hours of time
I've committed over the last, say 10 years. Or, feel free to highlight your
charity.


Thank you. You seemed pretty sure at the time. (40/love)

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They
don't really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for
this country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal
conservative for sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more
of ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping
the ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved
too late in the process. I don't see those on the radical right
honestly evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush,
Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in
name or in fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between
Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing
YOUR money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you
think?

I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious
time. I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to
tell me otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are
wrong. Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.


Really? What information? Please be specific. I'd like to know how you
know how much I make, paid in taxes, or donated, plus the number of hours
of time I've committed over the last, say 10 years. Or, feel free to
highlight your charity.


Thank you. You seemed pretty sure at the time. (40/love)


I don't understand your response.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They
don't really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for
this country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal
conservative for sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more
of ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping
the ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved
too late in the process. I don't see those on the radical right
honestly evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush,
Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in
name or in fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between
Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing
YOUR money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you
think?
I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious
time. I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to
tell me otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are
wrong. Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.

Really? What information? Please be specific. I'd like to know how you
know how much I make, paid in taxes, or donated, plus the number of hours
of time I've committed over the last, say 10 years. Or, feel free to
highlight your charity.


Thank you. You seemed pretty sure at the time. (40/love)


I don't understand your response.

Don't worry about it.

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:50:04 -0400, Jim wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:33:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
i'm finding that the conservatives here have a woeful lack of
knowledge about current events...
Firstly, I disagree with you labeling them "conservative." They
don't really appear to be that. I think radical right (radical for
this country anyway) would be more appropriate. I'm a fiscal
conservative for sure. I'm a liberal when it comes to social issues.

Secondly, I'm shocked by the seeming lack of knowledge about current
events also. I think that's not really the case. I think it's more
of ignoring facts when they're inconvenient.

I'm happy to reevaluate the performance of Obama and/or the Dem.
"leadership" in Congress as necessary. The latter are truly dropping
the ball right now, and I strongly believe that Obama got involved
too late in the process. I don't see those on the radical right
honestly evaluating those politicians (and other, e.g., Beck, Rush,
Wilson, Palin, Cheney) on the right who are leadership roles (in
name or in fact).
It's good to see you have found your 'niche' here, right between
Harry
and w3fh, with Donnie as a chaser.

If you find things too shocking, there really are a lot of political
groups where your expertise would be immensely appreciated.
She is a fiscal conservative, in her words, meaning she wants to make
and keep her own money. On social issues, she doesn't mind throwing
YOUR money around. It's so easy to be a liberal socialist, don't you
think?
I'm pretty sure that I've donated a lot more of my hard-earned money to
charity that you. I'm certain that I've donated more of my precious
time. I'm also betting that you don't do much of either. Feel free to
tell me otherwise, of course.

Based on the information you have provided I can easily say you are
wrong. Move over Donny we have another dip**** on board.

Really? What information? Please be specific. I'd like to know how you
know how much I make, paid in taxes, or donated, plus the number of hours
of time I've committed over the last, say 10 years. Or, feel free to
highlight your charity.


Thank you. You seemed pretty sure at the time. (40/love)


I don't understand your response.

Don't worry about it.

I think you've got the Energizer Bunny on the leash.
--
John H

All decisions, even those of liberals, are the result of binary thinking.