On Sep 11, 12:38*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...

Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

No. But I belive you are thinking derisionally.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

No one, "appointed" the President. However I considered that to be a
good alternate to "President Elect" which you evidently have a problem
in deciphering. Mr. Obama was "Elected" and therefore "President
Elect" is a proper title. But it's possible you haven't understood
that before. now.

Uncanny revelation, eh?

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:38:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

You'll quickly find your time wasted with this idiota, if you catch my
Spanish drift.

"Jim" wrote in message
m...
wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:05:53 -0400, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

The left has taken to calling Afghanistan "Obama's Vietnam." Well, if
we're going to let troops die as part of a PR stunt, then yes, it does
begin to resemble Vietnam.

Either we're going to give our troops every advantage in an effort to
allow them to win or we should, in fact, get out. If Obama has in mind
a Nixon-style "decent interval" where we are going to let troops be
killed in an effort not to win a war but to simply contrive a
politically-palatable "defeat with honor," then get them out of there.


I say, get them out of there. We have nothing to gain by staying.

If we really wanted to get Bin Laden the best way would have been to
ignore him until he stuck his head up and then just send in a small
team to shoot him.
We should have bombed Afghanistan with school supplies and other aid
after the Soviets left. They would have handed Bin Laden's head to us
on a plate.

I really wonder how much of this is driven by women's rights groups
and drug warriors.

Ever read the book, "Three Cups of Tea?" That's exactly what the author
did, bomb them with schools and supplies.

A well worth read. Should be read by those who disagree, though.

Friend and sorority sister of my wife started and runs
http://www.wwwunited.org/
Send some support to them. Josie has had some interesting experiences
Middle East.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Sep 11, 12:38 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...

Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

No. But I belive you are thinking derisionally.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

No one, "appointed" the President. However I considered that to be a
good alternate to "President Elect" which you evidently have a problem
in deciphering. Mr. Obama was "Elected" and therefore "President
Elect" is a proper title. But it's possible you haven't understood
that before. now.

Uncanny revelation, eh?

Are you foreign born and don't speak English all that well?

Your definition is completely wrong: A president-elect is a political
candidate who has been elected president but who has not yet been sworn in,
or officially taken office, as it is still occupied by the current outgoing
president.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:38:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

You'll quickly find your time wasted with this idiota, if you catch my
Spanish drift.


Dostoevsky!

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:32:12 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Sep 11, 12:38 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...

Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

No. But I belive you are thinking derisionally.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

No one, "appointed" the President. However I considered that to be a
good alternate to "President Elect" which you evidently have a problem
in deciphering. Mr. Obama was "Elected" and therefore "President
Elect" is a proper title. But it's possible you haven't understood
that before. now.

Uncanny revelation, eh?

Are you foreign born and don't speak English all that well?

Your definition is completely wrong: A president-elect is a political
candidate who has been elected president but who has not yet been sworn in,
or officially taken office, as it is still occupied by the current outgoing
president.

To quote Beavis and Butthead, the guy is a cornholio.

On Sep 11, 1:32*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Sep 11, 12:38 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...

Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?
No. But I belive you are *thinking derisionally.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?
No one, "appointed" the President. However I considered that to be a
good alternate to "President Elect" which you evidently have a problem
in deciphering. Mr. Obama was "Elected" and therefore "President
Elect" is a proper title. But it's possible you haven't understood
that before. now.

Uncanny revelation, eh?

Are you foreign born and don't speak English all that well?

You tell me.

Your definition is completely wrong: A president-elect is a political
candidate who has been elected president but who has not yet been sworn in,
or officially taken office, as it is still occupied by the current outgoing
president.

Not always.

--
Nom=de=Plume (Pennie)

On Sep 12, 12:17*am, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:32:12 -0700, "nom=de=plume"



wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Sep 11, 12:38 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....

Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

No. But I belive you are *thinking derisionally.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

No one, "appointed" the President. However I considered that to be a
good alternate to "President Elect" which you evidently have a problem
in deciphering. Mr. Obama was "Elected" and therefore "President
Elect" is a proper title. But it's possible you haven't understood
that before. now.

Uncanny revelation, eh?

Are you foreign born and don't speak English all that well?

Your definition is completely wrong: A president-elect is a political
candidate who has been elected president but who has not yet been sworn in,
or officially taken office, as it is still occupied by the current outgoing
president.

To quote Beavis and Butthead, the guy is a cornholio.

A quote from two of your philosophical giants?

On Sep 11, 1:33*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...



On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:38:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
....
Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

You'll quickly find your time wasted with this idiota, if you catch my
Spanish drift.

Dostoevsky!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Ah! I see you are addressing JPS. and you say-"Dostoevsky." I take it
that his post reminded you of "Fyodor Dostoevsky?"

So which of JPS' writings does he remind you of? "The Idiot?" or "The
Possessed?"

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Sep 11, 1:33 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

...



On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:38:56 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
Yes, let's see what your President-elect can do. That is, if he will
do anything at all.

President elect? Ummmm.... are you posting from the past?

--
Nom=de=Plume

Pennie, would you prefer "President-appointed?"

I would prefer the facts of which you seem to be lacking. Who exactly
appointed Pres. Obama?

You'll quickly find your time wasted with this idiota, if you catch my
Spanish drift.

Dostoevsky!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Ah! I see you are addressing JPS. and you say-"Dostoevsky." I take it
that his post reminded you of "Fyodor Dostoevsky?"

So which of JPS' writings does he remind you of? "The Idiot?" or "The
Possessed?"

If you don't already know the answers to your questions, you'll never know.
Misquoting Louis Armstrong if you didn't get it.




--
Nom=de=Plume