thunder wrote:
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:05:22 +0000, Steve wrote:


Congress has no authority to grant "health care."

The hell it doesn't. It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the
common defence". It's "promote the general Welfare".


Steve and others think that phrase means "...promote the general welfare
of the rich at the expense of the middle and lower income classes..."

On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

The hell it doesn't. It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the

common defence". It's "promote the general Welfare".


Steve and others think that phrase means "...promote the general welfare
of the rich at the expense of the middle and lower income classes..."

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.

Steve wrote:
On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

The hell it doesn't. It's in the Preamble, right after "provide for the

common defence". It's "promote the general Welfare".

Steve and others think that phrase means "...promote the general welfare
of the rich at the expense of the middle and lower income classes..."

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.


Sorry, Steve-o, but your interpretation of that clause is entirely
wrong. You're just "to" stupid.

On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general
welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw
with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.


Sorry, Steve-o, but your interpretation of that clause is entirely
wrong. You're just "to" stupid.

It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's in the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"

Steve wrote:
On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general
welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw
with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.

Sorry, Steve-o, but your interpretation of that clause is entirely
wrong. You're just "to" stupid.

It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's in the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


Moron.




clause, n.

(klɔ�z)

Also 4–6 claus, 5 clawse, clausse.

[a. OF. clause, ad. late or med.L. clausa, app. in sense of L. clausula
close of a period or formula, conclusion, clause, dim. of *clausa,
itself not recorded as n. in ancient Latin; f. L. claudĕre, claus-um to
close. Cf. Pr. clauza; It. uses clausula.]

1. a.1.a A short sentence; a single passage or member of a discourse or
writing; a distinct part or member of a sentence, esp. in Gramm.
Analysis, one containing a subject and predicate. Also attrib. and Comb.
clause, n.

H the K wrote:
Steve wrote:
On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general
welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw
with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.

Sorry, Steve-o, but your interpretation of that clause is entirely
wrong. You're just "to" stupid.

It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's
in the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


Moron.

Meaninig H K cannot rebut your facts.

BAR wrote:
H the K wrote:
Steve wrote:
On 4-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

Steve can read, unlike most "Amerikkkans." . promote the general
welfare
means letting you do what it right for you as long as it doesn't screw
with
others. It doesn't mean PROVIDE welfare for those to stupid or lazy to
provide for themselves.

Sorry, Steve-o, but your interpretation of that clause is entirely
wrong. You're just "to" stupid.

It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's
in the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


Moron.

Meaninig H K cannot rebut your facts.



There's no need to "rebut" morons.

"It's not a 'clause'"

snerk

On 5-Sep-2009, BAR wrote:

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


Moron.

Meaninig H K cannot rebut your facts.

Facts are extremely frustrating to the misguided and ignorant masses.

On 5-Sep-2009, H the K wrote:

clause, n.

(klɔ�z)

Also 4–6 claus, 5 clawse, clausse.

[a. OF. clause, ad. late or med.L. clausa, app. in sense of L. clausula
close of a period or formula, conclusion, clause, dim. of *clausa,
itself not recorded as n. in ancient Latin; f. L. claudĕre, claus-um to
close. Cf. Pr. clauza; It. uses clausula.]

1. a.1.a A short sentence; a single passage or member of a discourse or
writing; a distinct part or member of a sentence, esp. in Gramm.
Analysis, one containing a subject and predicate. Also attrib. and Comb.
clause, n.

* Date: 14th century
Idiot:

1: usually offensive : a person affected with extreme mental retardation
2 : a foolish or stupid person

— idiot adjective

"Steve" wrote in message
...
It's not a "clause," (hahahahaha....idiot) article or amendment. It's in
the
introduction, formally known as the preamble. It carries no weight
whatsoever, even IF you were coherent.

Government lackey or union clown "member?"


You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

--
Nom=de=Plume