"Steve" wrote in message
...
Nothing needs clarification. That cute phrase is to explain the purpose of
the constitution. It has ZERO weight.

In fact, if any imbiciles think the intro to the constitution is
meaningful,
they probably read the ramblings on the walls of outhouses with serious
introspection also.


You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
...
Nothing needs clarification. That cute phrase is to explain the purpose of
the constitution. It has ZERO weight.

In fact, if any imbiciles think the intro to the constitution is
meaningful,
they probably read the ramblings on the walls of outhouses with serious
introspection also.


You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
...
Nothing needs clarification. That cute phrase is to explain the purpose
of
the constitution. It has ZERO weight.

In fact, if any imbiciles think the intro to the constitution is
meaningful,
they probably read the ramblings on the walls of outhouses with serious
introspection also.


You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.


The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Sep 5, 4:31*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...





nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
...
Nothing needs clarification. That cute phrase is to explain the purpose
of
the constitution. It has ZERO weight.

In fact, if any imbiciles think the intro to the constitution is
meaningful,
they probably read the ramblings on the walls of outhouses with serious
introspection also.

You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.

The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Sep 5, 4:31*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message

...





nom=de=plume wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
...
Nothing needs clarification. That cute phrase is to explain the purpose
of
the constitution. It has ZERO weight.

In fact, if any imbiciles think the intro to the constitution is
meaningful,
they probably read the ramblings on the walls of outhouses with serious
introspection also.

You are completely wrong. Here's the link.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.

The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."


"Although the preamble *is not a source of power* for any department
of the
Federal Government..."

That is very instructive.

In article ,
says...

On 5-Sep-2009, JustWait wrote:

The stupidity promoted by them simply shows many people are evolving in
reverse. This is reinforced by their staring at an idiot box and
thinking
they are informed.

Please do list us where you get your "real" information... New York
Lies? MSNBC/GE/DNC? The Daily Kos? Jay Lenno???

Interesting list of misinformation. Do those itemize your list of sources?
It explains a lot.

Please cite which facts I stated were incorrect? Pffftttt...

How did you get enough money to input text in a news group? Rent-to-own???
Are you at a library?

So, we have yet another bumper sticker reader. Sorry, I just had to ask
because every time I hear folks talking about how "informed" they are,
they refuse to answer that one simple question... It's all right though,
we know you can't really tell us as we would all laugh too hard. Thanks
for sparing us...

Add another cowardly desk dweller to the list.... plonk



--
Wafa free since 2009

"Jack" wrote in message
...
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.

The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as
follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."


That is very instructive.


Try finishing the sentence... I think it's pretty clear that you're pretty
wrong. Why not admit it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/
For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.
The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as
follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."


That is very instructive.


Try finishing the sentence... I think it's pretty clear that you're pretty
wrong. Why not admit it.


Here is the first sentence in it's entirety. Notice the period at the end.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of
the Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as
evidence of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/
For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.
The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as
follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."


That is very instructive.


Try finishing the sentence... I think it's pretty clear that you're pretty
wrong. Why not admit it.


Who elects the national leaders?

On Sep 6, 12:22*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/c...tion/preamble/

For the purposes of this discussion there is no need to read beyond the
first sentence. It's very clear.

The first sentence of the Purpose and Effect of the Preamble is as
follows.
Yes, it's very clear.

"Although the preamble is not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government, the Supreme Court has often referred to it as evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution."

That is very instructive.

Try finishing the sentence... I think it's pretty clear that you're pretty
wrong. Why not admit it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Let's re-arrange the sentence. "While some have referred to it as
evidence
of the origin, scope, and purpose of the Constitution, the preamble is
not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government."

What is it about "not a source of power for any department of the
Federal Government" do you not understand?