Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Doesn't matter, that's the price they pay to get your money and USE it. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NotNow" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Doesn't matter, that's the price they pay to get your money and USE it. Yes it matters. You invested $30k and your employer matched for another $30k. With the market, that $60k went to $300k. You lost 40% of the $300k. How much you still got? $180k. You did not lose 40% of your investment. You still are 200% a head. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Calif Bill wrote:
"NotNow" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Doesn't matter, that's the price they pay to get your money and USE it. Yes it matters. You invested $30k and your employer matched for another $30k. With the market, that $60k went to $300k. You lost 40% of the $300k. How much you still got? $180k. You did not lose 40% of your investment. You still are 200% a head. Again, that's the cost the burden for having my money to use. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "NotNow" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "NotNow" wrote in message ... Calif Bill wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Aug 12, 10:22 am, JustWait wrote: In article fe3aa04e-98ba-4640-beeb-73899a6bb102 @o32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 12, 8:42 am, BAR wrote: H the K wrote: What we have now is health insurance via corporatism. I wouldn't mind seeing the federal government getting involved in a direct fashion and closely regulating the health insurance industry, and also offering directly to Americans health insurance and ways to pay for it, be those individual or collective (taxation) methods. Demonize the evil corporations! Don't you get tired of spewing that line? oh you're absolutely right. just look at what they've done for the american economy in the last year or so. Pfffttt... Yeah, it's the corporations who have proposed two trillion in spending... right.. -- no, it's the corporations that drained my 401K to pay for their $6000 night stands, their maybach sedans, etc. i just have to pay for their mistakes The same corporations that doubled and tripled the money you and your corporate employer contributed? and then you lost 40%. But still have more than if you had got 2% a year in a savings account. If you had saved. Doesn't matter, that's the price they pay to get your money and USE it. Yes it matters. You invested $30k and your employer matched for another $30k. With the market, that $60k went to $300k. You lost 40% of the $300k. How much you still got? $180k. You did not lose 40% of your investment. You still are 200% a head. Again, that's the cost the burden for having my money to use. Not arguing the vig for using your money. But lots of those 401k's were highly inflated gains. Better than Made-off gains. But some are counting the 40% decline as a loss. Was a paper gain and a paper loss. I had to move a 401K when the market was great. While decidine where to invest the money, the market crashed. I got to keep those irrational gains as the money was in a cash account. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Obama: The Mayo Clinic is a beacon on health care | General | |||
Republican Health Care Plan | General | |||
Health Care | General | |||
Health care under McCain, Obama | ASA | |||
FREE INSTANT ON-LINE HEALTH PLAN QUOTES | General |