On May 31, 1:21*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:





Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wow, a person with this vulgar trash accusing other's of being
"low".......

On Sun, 31 May 2009 10:18:58 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:46:21 -0400, D K
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 10:32:06 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2009 09:54:16 -0400, jim785 wrote:

HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of posting
with their real names, or even their real initials, because of the crap
they throw up here.
But not you. You seem to be pretty proud of yourself. WAFA
Hey, dickbrain. How many handles do you need? I'll now be plonking
your third. Do you have more?

If l were he, I'd add a random number generator to my 'handle' just to
keep you on your toes.

Besides, he, unlike you and yours, writes decent stuff. Why filter
him? Cause he disagrees with you?
--
John H

That's their MO: If you can't debate, retreat and "ignore". We all know
that WAFA, at least, is incapable of that and reads everything.

DK writes decent stuff. What a joke. He follows his "enemies" around
stuffing his nose in their cyber asses. It's by far his favorite
activity here.

He's as putrid and festered as Herring the hemorrhoidal ass.

Learn to read along.

You are progressing well in the name-calling category. Soon you'll be
up with Harry.
--
John H

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher

wrote:
On May 31, 1:21 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:





Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:
You can't tell a book by its cover.
But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".
Casady
Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?
WAFA isn't afraid of anything!
Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)
If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wow, a person with this vulgar trash accusing other's of being
"low".......

He has his own issues. At least he shares a mental deficiency with
WAFA. How else would you explain his crap?

jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:53:13 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

jps wrote:


Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:


Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.
I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.
JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.


Very little in rec.boats is funnier than "Reggie" castigating others for
their behavior when he is the ranking snarky asshole here.


This is a classic line from "Reggie," by the way:

"I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point."

Reggie, apparently has not read much quality 20th Century English
language literature from, say, Joyce or Lawrence or Donleavy.

What a tool.

On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:01:25 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.
I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.
JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.


Very little in rec.boats is funnier than "Reggie" castigating others for
their behavior when he is the ranking snarky asshole here.


This is a classic line from "Reggie," by the way:

"I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point."

Reggie, apparently has not read much quality 20th Century English
language literature from, say, Joyce or Lawrence or Donleavy.

What a tool.

He's a victim of middle class morals. The dog is trained in the same.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:01:25 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.
I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.
JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.
Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.

Very little in rec.boats is funnier than "Reggie" castigating others for
their behavior when he is the ranking snarky asshole here.


This is a classic line from "Reggie," by the way:

"I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point."

Reggie, apparently has not read much quality 20th Century English
language literature from, say, Joyce or Lawrence or Donleavy.

What a tool.

He's a victim of middle class morals. The dog is trained in the same.

I have no problems with profanity, it just sounds childish when you use
it in every sentence. Trust me, you calling everyone a **** does
nothing to help your case, and that includes **** lappers, **** ****ers,
**** lickers etc. Now you can insert the word "dick" where "****:" used
to be and you will find you are no more effective. Now, if it makes
you feel good, and provides you with a a sense of moral outrage, than it
is the right word to use. I thought you repetitive babble in here was
to try to convenience those on the fence that your outrage was correct.
If all you say is "**** You", "you are nothing more than a useless
piece of **** etc", it doesn't matter if you have middle class, low
class or upper class morals, NO ONE will consider your post as anything
more than a loud noise. That is all Harry is interested in, and he
has stated that many times. I just was hoping that you might be
someone who express your beliefs and would actually change spmeons
opinion on an issue.

Well I guess you are not, so all I have to say is "You swine. You vulgar
little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas, I'll bet
you couldn't pour **** out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You
are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer
than be seen with you.

You're a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little
worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a
cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a
revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.

You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared
richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into
this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned
by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed
themselfs in recognition of what they had done.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species
as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very
thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid
you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a
fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?

Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to
impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop
will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it
more rapidly.

You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive
its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to
fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame
of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of
your own trite, foolish beliefs.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid,
nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an
ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you.
You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land
that reality forgot.

And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important
statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What
fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted
tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat,
spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and
obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living
emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a
disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meatslapper.

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are
deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of
wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You
are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow
wherever you go.

You smarmy lagerlout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock.
You grotty wanking oik artless base-court apple-john. You clouted
boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless
crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You
cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry ****head cockup
pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You
dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.

You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are
degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you
exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away.

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid.
Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond
the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are
trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that
even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no
intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on
Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire
galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll.
Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some
primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure
essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an
epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again
for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant
questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of
the rest of this drivel. Duh.

The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped
away most of your of what you wrote, because, well... it didn't really
say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful.
I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of
babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have
learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success.
True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take
for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we
sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who
find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your
case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been
"right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best
of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing
such a demand on you."

Now I feel much better.


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects