D K wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because
of the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials
are not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

I have never understood why people feel that everyone should use their
real name, and then get upset when people post information readily
available. If your name and personal information is readily available
online, why post using your real name? If your name and personal
information is NOT readily available online, what difference does it
make if you use John Smith, Joe Blow, Reginald P. Smithers III., Don
White, DK, HK or JPS?


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects