Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

D K wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because
of the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials
are not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

I have never understood why people feel that everyone should use their
real name, and then get upset when people post information readily
available. If your name and personal information is readily available
online, why post using your real name? If your name and personal
information is NOT readily available online, what difference does it
make if you use John Smith, Joe Blow, Reginald P. Smithers III., Don
White, DK, HK or JPS?


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

On May 31, 1:21*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:





Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wow, a person with this vulgar trash accusing other's of being
"low".......

wrote:
On May 31, 1:21 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:





Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:
You can't tell a book by its cover.
But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".
Casady
Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?
WAFA isn't afraid of anything!
Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)
If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wow, a person with this vulgar trash accusing other's of being
"low".......

He has his own issues. At least he shares a mental deficiency with
WAFA. How else would you explain his crap?

jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

On Sun, 31 May 2009 19:53:13 -0400, D K
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.
YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

jps wrote:


Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:


Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.

I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.

JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.

jps wrote:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:35:54 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

jps wrote:

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.
What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.
So *you* are WAFA's new keeper? Better let dumb Don know. Let him down
easy. He's...dumb.
I'm no one's keeper but my family's.

I do recognize a low **** when I see one and you're the lowest.

Your father either beat you too hard or not enough.
JPS, you remind me of a middle school kid who just learned some
profanity and tries to make sure he includes the new words in every
sentence. I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point.

Everyone has his own style. Perhaps mine is just not your cup of tea.

Frankly, I don't care. I have nothing to gain or lose by moderating
my language in rec.boats.


Very little in rec.boats is funnier than "Reggie" castigating others for
their behavior when he is the ranking snarky asshole here.


This is a classic line from "Reggie," by the way:

"I told me kids that if they used profanity too often, it
appears that one has a very limited vocabulary, and it completely
diminishes the effectiveness when one actually wants to use an expletive
to emphasize a point."

Reggie, apparently has not read much quality 20th Century English
language literature from, say, Joyce or Lawrence or Donleavy.

What a tool.