On Fri, 29 May 2009 15:41:35 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 17:06:28 -0400, HK wrote:

Reggie is a turd. Period. Also a pussy. Oh...and remember when he was
pimping his alleged son's alleged girlfriend?

One look at the handle and he joined Hines on the delete without
reading list.

Casady

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
--
John H

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher

John H wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 15:41:35 -0500, Richard Casady
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 17:06:28 -0400, HK wrote:

Reggie is a turd. Period. Also a pussy. Oh...and remember when he was
pimping his alleged son's alleged girlfriend?
One look at the handle and he joined Hines on the delete without
reading list.

Casady

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.
--
John H

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher

I don't know how, but I missed that post the first time. What am I
going to do if I am on both Richard Casady and Harry Krause's "filter
list". Anyway, what kind of handle is Richard Casady, it sounds worse
than mine.

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of posting
with their real names, or even their real initials, because of the crap
they throw up here.

HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of posting
with their real names, or even their real initials, because of the crap
they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sat, 30 May 2009 08:36:20 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote:

HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of posting
with their real names, or even their real initials, because of the crap
they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

'Cause he's really smart?
--
John H

"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money." --Margaret Thatcher

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

D K wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because
of the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials
are not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

I have never understood why people feel that everyone should use their
real name, and then get upset when people post information readily
available. If your name and personal information is readily available
online, why post using your real name? If your name and personal
information is NOT readily available online, what difference does it
make if you use John Smith, Joe Blow, Reginald P. Smithers III., Don
White, DK, HK or JPS?


--
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq.

This Newsgroup post is a natural product. The slight variations in
spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in
no way are to be considered flaws or defects

On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:

Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady


Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?


WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.

On May 31, 1:21*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 30 May 2009 20:41:27 -0400, D K
wrote:





Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:
HK wrote:
Richard Casady wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:12:41 -0400, John H
wrote:

You can't tell a book by its cover.

But, with HK giving you guidance, you'll never go wrong. He's truly
remarkable.

There is a group where 95% post under their real name, and have been
doing so for an average of about ten years. Discussions of politics
and religion are banned, as are acronyms not in most dictionaries.
FBI, CIA are OK for example. I once thought about useing a handle.
"Dances With Wolves" is taken, so I settled on "Sleeps With Kitties ".

Casady

Most of the real ****s in this newsgroup are scared to death of
posting with their real names, or even their real initials, because of
the crap they throw up here.

YOu don't post under your real name, and how do you know my initials are
not RPS?

WAFA isn't afraid of anything!

Harry Krause
2015 XXX Lane
XXX, Maryland 206XX
410 535-1XXX (voice)
202 365-0XXX (cell)

If he posts that **** again, the X's *might* disappear.

What a ****ing **** you are.

Low, ****ing ****.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Wow, a person with this vulgar trash accusing other's of being
"low".......