Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 8:01*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:05:00 -0500, BAR wrote:
Somebody is going to have to explain all of the conflicting statements
and news reports stating Barak Hussein Obama met with Gov. Blagojevich
on Nov. 5th. Then he didn't meet with him. That Axelrod lied on national
TV on Nov. 23rd.

Nothing for nothing, but even *if* Axelrod lied, it's not a crime, and I
wouldn't hold the presses over a politico lying. *Unfortunately, it is
what they do far too often.

Name one that has had a corruption scandal 5 weeks after the election
and 5 weeks before being sworn in?

Frankly, I still can't name one, except, possibly, the Supreme Court coup
that put GWB in office. ;-)

Furthermore, you are generally pretty well informed. You do know that
although it was buried in the New York Times and never mentioned at
all in the MSM for the most part, 27 media outlets including the NYT,
Miami Sun, and others through the sunshine laws did a count of the
votes in Florida a couple of months after the election. The result was
clear and found that in fact, Bush won, that's why it was buried on
page D 27 (or something like that) in the New York Lies.. Only the
ideologues and the intentionally uninformed still hang on the "Bush
stole the election" bandwagon. Again, I never expected that from you...

Must be something in the water..
 

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:56:42 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


What was really funny was Daily talking about how disgusted he was in
the corruption.. He is probably just one notch above Jackson on the most
likely and deserving reciepients of a.... These two families links to
corruption are only surpassed by the Kennedys...

I don't know much about Daley, but I do know his father was "the last of
the bosses". Illinois isn't coming off to well lately. Along with
Louisiana and Alaska, they are probably the most corrupt states we have.

Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 8:08*pm, wrote:
On Dec 10, 8:01*pm, wrote:

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:05:00 -0500, BAR wrote:
Somebody is going to have to explain all of the conflicting statements
and news reports stating Barak Hussein Obama met with Gov. Blagojevich
on Nov. 5th. Then he didn't meet with him. That Axelrod lied on national
TV on Nov. 23rd.

Nothing for nothing, but even *if* Axelrod lied, it's not a crime, and I
wouldn't hold the presses over a politico lying. *Unfortunately, it is
what they do far too often.

Name one that has had a corruption scandal 5 weeks after the election
and 5 weeks before being sworn in?

Frankly, I still can't name one, except, possibly, the Supreme Court coup
that put GWB in office. ;-)

Furthermore, you are generally pretty well informed. You do know that
although it was buried in the New York Times and never mentioned at
all in the MSM for the most part, 27 media outlets including the NYT,
Miami Sun, and others through the sunshine laws did a count of the
votes in Florida a couple of months after the election. The result was
clear and found that in fact, Bush won, that's why it was buried on
page D 27 (or something like that) in the New York Lies.. Only the
ideologues and the intentionally uninformed still hang on the "Bush
stole the election" bandwagon. Again, I never expected that from you...

EDIT, I may have the name of the Miami paper wrong, but there were
over 20 media outlets who sued and did the recount.

Must be something in the water..
 

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:08:52 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:


Furthermore, you are generally pretty well informed. You do know that
although it was buried in the New York Times and never mentioned at all
in the MSM for the most part, 27 media outlets including the NYT, Miami
Sun, and others through the sunshine laws did a count of the votes in
Florida a couple of months after the election. The result was clear and
found that in fact, Bush won, that's why it was buried on page D 27 (or
something like that) in the New York Lies.. Only the ideologues and the
intentionally uninformed still hang on the "Bush stole the election"
bandwagon. Again, I never expected that from you...

I didn't say Bush didn't win. All evidence I have seen says he would
have. I said there was a Supreme Court coup, and I'll stand by that.

Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 8:15*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:08:52 -0800, justwaitafrekinminute wrote:
Furthermore, you are generally pretty well informed. You do know that
although it was buried in the New York Times and never mentioned at all
in the MSM for the most part, 27 media outlets including the NYT, Miami
Sun, and others through the sunshine laws did a count of the votes in
Florida a couple of months after the election. The result was clear and
found that in fact, Bush won, that's why it was buried on page D 27 (or
something like that) in the New York Lies.. Only the ideologues and the
intentionally uninformed still hang on the "Bush stole the election"
bandwagon. Again, I never expected that from you...

I didn't say Bush didn't win. All evidence I have seen says he would
have. *I said there was a Supreme Court coup, and I'll stand by that.

Ok, not that it matters, but I take your word for it.. phew, I thought
you were going to the "far left loonie" side.. ;)

Must be something in the water..
 

Must be something in the water..
 

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:25:30 -0500, BAR wrote:


You are referring to the Florida Supreme Court.

No.

Must be something in the water..
 

Must be something in the water..
 

Must be something in the water..