Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 9:33*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 10, 7:48 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:15:57 -0500, BAR wrote:
Direct contact or indirect contact? Is there a legal difference?
Is one a crime and the other a conspiracy to commit crime?
IANAL, but, so far, I don't see any crime that Obama was involved in. *
I'm not even sure, that if he did pay for the Senate seat, if that would
be a crime. *It sure as hell would be distasteful, I'm not sure about a
crime. *I suspect, among politicians, *nothing* gets given away for
free. *How do you think all that pork gets added to bills? *"I'll vote
for your bill, if you will build me a bridge to nowhere."

What was really funny was Daily talking about how disgusted he was in
the corruption.. He is probably just one notch above Jackson on the
most likely and deserving reciepients of a.... These two families
links to corruption are only surpassed by the Kennedys...

Other than some crap you read on a reich-wing web site or heard on
right-wing hate radio, what serious evidence do you have that pins
Richard M. Daley to real corruption?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, let me see... About as many times as you have told the truth here
in the last 15 years.. That would be uh, zero...

Must be something in the water..
 

Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 9:56*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 10, 9:33 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 10, 7:48 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:15:57 -0500, BAR wrote:
Direct contact or indirect contact? Is there a legal difference?
Is one a crime and the other a conspiracy to commit crime?
IANAL, but, so far, I don't see any crime that Obama was involved in.. *
I'm not even sure, that if he did pay for the Senate seat, if that would
be a crime. *It sure as hell would be distasteful, I'm not sure about a
crime. *I suspect, among politicians, *nothing* gets given away for
free. *How do you think all that pork gets added to bills? *"I'll vote
for your bill, if you will build me a bridge to nowhere."
What was really funny was Daily talking about how disgusted he was in
the corruption.. He is probably just one notch above Jackson on the
most likely and deserving reciepients of a.... These two families
links to corruption are only surpassed by the Kennedys...
Other than some crap you read on a reich-wing web site or heard on
right-wing hate radio, what serious evidence do you have that pins
Richard M. Daley to real corruption?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Uh, let me see... About as many times as you have told the truth here
in the last 15 years.. That would be uh, zero...

Yup. You got nuttin' but the crap you suckle on from the reich-wing
sites. You weren't even aware that the current Daley in Chicago isn't
the one you vaguely remember.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, since I don't listen to talk radio, can I assume you make up the
rest too? Of course I can, you couldn't have an intellectually honest
conversation if your life depended on it, dismissed...

Must be something in the water..
 

wrote in message
t...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:15:57 -0500, BAR wrote:


Direct contact or indirect contact? Is there a legal difference?

Is one a crime and the other a conspiracy to commit crime?

IANAL, but, so far, I don't see any crime that Obama was involved in.
I'm not even sure, that if he did pay for the Senate seat, if that would
be a crime. It sure as hell would be distasteful, I'm not sure about a
crime. I suspect, among politicians, *nothing* gets given away for
free. How do you think all that pork gets added to bills? "I'll vote
for your bill, if you will build me a bridge to nowhere."

If Obama knew of the crime and did not report it, he could probably get
charged with conspiracy to commit a crime.

Must be something in the water..
 

Must be something in the water..
 

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:03:47 -0800, Calif Bill wrote:


If Obama knew of the crime and did not report it, he could probably get
charged with conspiracy to commit a crime.

I don't think so. Conspiracy is an agreement to commit a crime. To my
knowledge, few states require you to report a crime. Clearly, you
should, but I don't think it's a requirement.

Must be something in the water..
 

On Dec 10, 4:09*pm, Boater wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq. wrote:





Boater wrote:

They rotate. Look it up.

I did, I clicked on it over 10 times, and I showed you the ads I saw.
Nothing that came close to be a sex ad. *They showed you penis
extender ads *based upon your internet history gathered via cookies
and ad trackers. *Yesterday I was looking at HDTV to buy my mom for
Christmas, hence the ad for the HDTV. *I also reserved a rental car with
Budget a few days ago, hence the ad for Hertz. * Very few people who
visit that site, ever see ads for penis extenders. *You are one of
the lucky ones.

I am just trying to be helpful. *You wife may know about ad trackers
and wonder why she keeps getting sex ads every time she logs onto
your computer.

Sure, Reggie. I believe you. Not.

For someone who spends as much time on the internet as you do you really
are naive.

It is hard to believe but this is the first link when I did a Google on
"ad trackers":

"All too often adverts you see online are your past come back to haunt
you. Advertisers use tracking cookies to capture the web history of
users and monitor usage of a particular site. That information is used
to serve up adverts most likely to influence you."

http://www.newscientist.com/blog/tec...-to-evade-web-...

The fact that you saw a penis extender was not a reflection of the
quality of the blog Tom linked.

It was a reflection of your internet usage and ad tracker cookies.

It's interesting how you take a snippet of "maybe" and turn it into
something universally true and cast in stone. I'm aware of "tracking"
cookies. I dump all but a few of them off my desktop every other day. I
doubt my book purchases on Amazon or my photo gear purchases here and
there gave the result you believe.

I will admit, though, that today, for the first time in my memory, you
provided a bit of useful info on that wireless shutter.

Otherwise, though, I couldn't attest that you know schitt.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Pffffttt, windoze hero's ;) Just because you click "clear cookies"
doesn't mean you don't still have tracking going on. Does your IE have
a Google bar? snerk

Must be something in the water..
 

Well for a few weeks now Sen. Dick *The Turban* Durbin has been
calling for the pardon of former Gov. (and petty thief) George Ryan.

Maybe his thinking is that it would improve tthe image of Illinois not
to have to governors locked up at the same time.

?;^ Q

Must be something in the water..
 

On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:41:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Well for a few weeks now Sen. Dick *The Turban* Durbin has been
calling for the pardon of former Gov. (and petty thief) George Ryan.

Maybe his thinking is that it would improve tthe image of Illinois not
to have to governors locked up at the same time.

?;^ Q

Hey you -

I returned yours from yesterday.
--
John

Blue skies, Smilin' at me.....
 

"I don't think there's any cloud over this opening ... I think
there's nothing but sunshine over me."

Blagojevich. The day before he was arrested.