wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)


Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:41:02 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


Welcome to the club.
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:41:02 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.
And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


Welcome to the club.


Why, it's John Herring...the "Christian."

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


I'm pulling your leg - again - Tom. An interesting fact about you is
that you like to pull the legs of others, but when others do it to you,
you get ****ed - fast. You also get very upset very fast when others
deign to question your opinions. As evidence of the latter, I offer up
your defensiveness about eTec outboards and 4/3'ds format cameras.

I think McCain was badly used by the GOP. I think he is a better man
than the one his campaign depicted. But I don't think he wears his age
and his hard life well, and I believe they caught up to him during the
campaign.

My opinion on Palin, though, is the same: brainless. dangerous,
ideologue and first-class ditz.

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The
complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie
and his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


I'm pulling your leg - again - Tom. An interesting fact about you is
that you like to pull the legs of others, but when others do it to you,
you get ****ed - fast. You also get very upset very fast when others
deign to question your opinions. As evidence of the latter, I offer up
your defensiveness about eTec outboards and 4/3'ds format cameras.

You need to work on you ass kissing.

I think McCain was badly used by the GOP. I think he is a better man
than the one his campaign depicted. But I don't think he wears his age
and his hard life well, and I believe they caught up to him during the
campaign.

McCain is an idiot. Always was and always will be. Just ask his mother.

My opinion on Palin, though, is the same: brainless. dangerous,
ideologue and first-class ditz.

Your opinion means nothing.