![]() |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote: Boater wrote: BAR wrote: Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Ahhh 401k's.... Too bad about those. That's one of the reasons why many people are having trouble being forced to ante up tax dollars to save GM and it's union in their current form and contractual relationships. The "majority" are watching their own retirement investments tank, and are concerned about their jobs, their families, their financial stability. If you are still employed where your 401k is located and operating, is there a mechanism to withdraw those funds without withholding or tax penalty, and put them into another sort of tax deferred account, some sort of IRA, where you have some say over where the funds are invested? I wouldn't trust "the market" with my retirement funds, but I might trust a federally insurance bank or banks. Are you that clueless? Do you know what the difference between a 401k and an IRA is? I guess you should get your buddies in Congress to have a mattress account in every 401k. What I was curious about was whether there was an escape valve for an employee who wanted to get the hell out of 401k's and put his funds somewhere reliable and rational. That's all. Yes, I know the difference. Read for content, dropout. You can participate in the 401k plan or you not participate in the 401k plan. The latter will give you all of the options you want. There are disadvantages to both plans. But, you get to make the choice. Does a union worker have an option with respect to the union retirement plan? Why has your tone softened? D'oh. I am referring to those still working for an employer who have funds in 401k plans and want to get those funds out and invest them somewhere a bit more reliable than the crooked stock market. I They can place them in money market accounts or bond accounts. Each and every 401k plan will have one or both of these. understand they can decide not to have any more of their funds put into the 401k. The question was getting those funds out to reinvest them someplace more reliable. They can always quit their jobs to get at the money. The answer to your question about union workers is...many do, some don't. For those who don't why not? Why are they stuck in a pension plan that offers them no choices. |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:14:51 -0500, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: Can we get back to talking about Supreme Beings - meaning of course, me. It is all about me you know. Some Supreme Being. You called the election wrong. Maybe not. Some of your own party members are complaining that it is starting to look like four more years of the same. I hadn't noticed that Obama was appointing incompetent party hacks or ideologues the way Bush did and does. How the heck do you live with yourself issuing stupid statments like that? Holder, Richardson, Biden, Clinton (H), Podesta, Emmanual, Gorelich, Rice (Susan), Daschle, Geithner... Two, count'em, two former genreals - both what we used to call "flag pole" generals although to give one credit, at least he was a Marine - the other was a moron and a true insider's insider in the Pentagon. You really are a piece of work. I don't consider any of Obama's appointees incompetent party hacks or idealogues. You're certainly entitled to your political opinions, but since your party lost big time, I'm not concerned about them. What you care about former generals and $4.00 will get you a cuppa at Starbucks. That is the major difference between you and those of us on the right side of the political fence. We see ideologues and hacks on our side of the fence and your side of the fence. |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:55 -0500, BAR wrote:
Does the rule of law mean anything? From where do the laws of the USA come? I find it interesting that a lawyer, The Obama, is so ignorant of the laws of the USA. What is he hiding regarding his birth? Absolutely nothing, he has disclosed his birth certificate, and the state of Hawaii has declared it legitimate. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...ING01/81031064 |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:09:58 -0500, BAR wrote:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...ING01/81031064 We have seen a computer generated piece of paper. What we want is a photo copy of his birth certificate. I Was born just a couple of weeks after The Obama in Washington State. I have both a computer generated piece of paper and a photo copy of my birth certificate. They are not one in the same. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:09:58 -0500, BAR wrote: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...ING01/81031064 We have seen a computer generated piece of paper. What we want is a photo copy of his birth certificate. I Was born just a couple of weeks after The Obama in Washington State. I have both a computer generated piece of paper and a photo copy of my birth certificate. They are not one in the same. http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html That is the computer generated one. As I said, I have one of those from the State of Washington. I also have a photo copy of my Birth Certificate from the State of Washington too that was generated in September of 1961. I want to see a photo copy of the birth certificate issued in August of 1961 for The Obama. Anyone can printout a piece of paper and put some stamps on it. But, forging a document and embossing it with a 50 year old seal takes a real professional. |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:34:09 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:29:23 -0600, wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:11:47 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: Interesting - there is going to be a "scandal" during his first 100 days. If there is going to be a scandal, it isn't going to be that one. http://www.miamiherald.com/news/poli...ry/804684.html I did say it was silly, but it's still a valid issue and it will be reviewed at some point - it has to be because it's at the very core of what is and isnt' an American. I'm telling you - it's going to become an issue. Besides, it's all in Congress's hands anyway - they can fix this quickly and easily. However, the "scandal" will come from trying to make that "fix". It's going to happen. Forgot to add this: http://daveweigel.com/?p=2003 |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:04:37 -0600, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:55 -0500, BAR wrote: Does the rule of law mean anything? From where do the laws of the USA come? I find it interesting that a lawyer, The Obama, is so ignorant of the laws of the USA. What is he hiding regarding his birth? Absolutely nothing, he has disclosed his birth certificate, and the state of Hawaii has declared it legitimate. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...ING01/81031064 Ah - my friend it may not be a legitimate certificate - by law. For the reasons stated. That's what's going to be the issue - is that certificate a legal document based, as it is, on a flawed law? Again - I think it's silly and frankly, insulting to Obama and, this may surprize you, I'm on the opposite side - this is much to do about nothing - Congress can fix this immediately. But that's the issue - can Congress make this go away. And that's were the fun of discussing this is. |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:09:58 -0500, BAR wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:55 -0500, BAR wrote: Does the rule of law mean anything? From where do the laws of the USA come? I find it interesting that a lawyer, The Obama, is so ignorant of the laws of the USA. What is he hiding regarding his birth? Absolutely nothing, he has disclosed his birth certificate, and the state of Hawaii has declared it legitimate. http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/ar...ING01/81031064 We have seen a computer generated piece of paper. What we want is a photo copy of his birth certificate. I Was born just a couple of weeks after The Obama in Washington State. I have both a computer generated piece of paper and a photo copy of my birth certificate. They are not one in the same. Letr's not get side tracked here - that's not the issue. It is a legitimate certificate of birth - as far as it goes. The problem is that the circumstances of certification are extra legal as I stated. Let's not get all icky ballooky about the certificate itself - it's good. |
Bridge loan to nowhere..
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com