Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
Dear Group:
I have owned several boats (Taswell 43 and Farr 40). I am looking to buy a cruising boat and have identified two boats in particular that I am interested in. One is a Baltic 48 all fitted out for cruising and the other is an Oyster 485, newer and shinny but lacking self steering gear, sat phone and few other necessities for cruising. I would like any constructive comments regarrding these two boats! The Oyster has a skeg rudder and the Baltic does not, is this important? The Baltic is a cored hull laminate and the Oyster is solid, again any thoughts. They both appear to be quality boats, however, I am concerned that the Oyster is built in the UK and I know they cannot build cars or airplanes : ( Thanks in advance Hunter |
#2
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
"Hunter" wrote in message ... Dear Group: I have owned several boats (Taswell 43 and Farr 40). I am looking to buy a cruising boat and have identified two boats in particular that I am interested in. One is a Baltic 48 all fitted out for cruising and the other is an Oyster 485, newer and shinny but lacking self steering gear, sat phone and few other necessities for cruising. I would like any constructive comments regarrding these two boats! The Oyster has a skeg rudder and the Baltic does not, is this important? The Baltic is a cored hull laminate and the Oyster is solid, again any thoughts. They both appear to be quality boats, however, I am concerned that the Oyster is built in the UK and I know they cannot build cars or airplanes : ( Thanks in advance Hunter I do not know much about you. I take it you maybe in your late fifty. Why age is a concert is because you do not want to spent valuable time to equip or refurbish a boat for cruising. My first choice would the Baltic providing that I do not have to spent extra money to upgrade the navigational system, steering system and rudder, electrical, plumbing and rigging not to mention the sails and furling. On my Beneteau Oceanis I have a 6 foot 2 inches keel and a skeg. At first I was apprehensive about it. Now that I have used it I like it and its important to me. In my case it provides better directional stability. The world's best build boat are made with a solid core. However, with the quality of labour today you may find some internal de-lamination that can become as bad as water infiltration in a cored laminate hull. Racers tend to believe that cored laminate hulls are faster?? Shooting at point blank without having seen the Oyster 485 they seem to have a good reputation for cruising. I would do a present value evaluation between the two boats versus the cost of buying a new boat. |
#4
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
On 2008-07-10 19:05:18 -0400, Hunter said:
The Oyster has a skeg rudder and the Baltic does not, is this important? The Baltic is a cored hull laminate and the Oyster is solid, again any thoughts. I tend slightly to the skeg, but will run *away* from a cored hull. I don't yet believe they've worked all the bugs out of cored construction. -- Jere Lull Xan-à-Deux -- Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD Xan's pages: http://web.mac.com/jerelull/iWeb/Xan/ Our BVI trips & tips: http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#5
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
I think core is fine and, if fact, preferable, if you are in a price range
where are buying a newer boat. Another factor is having time to have the boat throroughly surveyed for water in the core. You should the immediately recheck and rebed every place where water could get in around deck fittings and keep checking. I was buying in a price and age range and under time constraints that made surveying a large number of boats at several hundred dollars a pop plus travel to look at them impractical in view of the number I would need to look at with a reasonable expectation of finding a sound one. I therefore chose a solid glass model. -- Roger Long |
#6
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
The Oyster has a skeg rudder and the Baltic does not, is this
important? That depends largely on what you want the boat to do. The skeg supported rudder is usually thought of as stronger, but at a sacrifice of some maneuverability. If designed & built properly (and one might assume that a Baltic definitely is) the spade rudder is plenty strong without a skeg. ... The Baltic is a cored hull laminate and the Oyster is solid, again any thoughts. Jere Lull wrote: I tend slightly to the skeg, but will run *away* from a cored hull. I don't yet believe they've worked all the bugs out of cored construction. Oh "they" definitely have, the bigger question is- has the builder done a proper job bonding the laminate skins to the core? Has the builder tapered all the core panels around the edges and terminated them properly? Is the core cut away (and edged properly, again) around all the thru-bolted hardware? With a Baltic, it would be a suprise if any of these were problems. A bigger question for used boats... has any previous owner screwed stuff into the cored areas without hardening it & sealing it properly? Anyone who says they don't like cored construction is really saying that they like their boats to be heavier & less strong than they could be. BTW all the Oysters I have seen also had significant cored sections in the deck & inner grid. A bigger question in choosing between these boats is if you like the raised salon layout of the Oyster, or the "afterguard vs crew" cockpit layout of the Baltic. Isn't it kind of odd that the OP didn't mention anything about this consideration? Fresh Breezes- Doug King PS to Larry- The Amel is to the Baltic what a Lexus is to a Ferrari |
#7
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
|
#8
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
My Taswell was a center cockpit and I liked that as one did not have
to move around the desk in a disorgainized sea. Another benefit of the center cockpit is a better aft owners stateroom. One of the reasons I like the Baltic is they appear to over build, three spreader mast, oversized blocks, wenches. Bottom line is I am looking for a strong comfortable cruiser n the 48-52 foot range. On Jul 12, 8:12*am, wrote: A bigger question in choosing between these boats is if you like the raised salon layout of the Oyster, or the "afterguard vs crew" cockpit layout of the Baltic. Isn't it kind of odd that the OP didn't mention anything about this consideration? Fresh Breezes- Doug King PS to Larry- The Amel is to the Baltic what a Lexus is to a Ferrari |
#9
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
Hunter wrote:
My Taswell was a center cockpit and I liked that as one did not have to move around the desk in a disorgainized sea. Another benefit of the center cockpit is a better aft owners stateroom. One of the reasons I like the Baltic is they appear to over build, three spreader mast, oversized blocks, wenches. Bottom line is I am looking for a strong comfortable cruiser n the 48-52 foot range. Baltics are widely considered among the best built boats in the world, the business was startd by some guys who worked for Swan, and thought the Swans weren't built quite good enough OTOH they are more the racer-cruiser than pure cruising vessel. It would be a good idea to check out an Amel. At this budget level, I assume you're not averse to doing some travel while boat-shopping! Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#10
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Blatic 48 Vs Oyster 48
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:06:53 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
One of the reasons I like the Baltic is they appear to over build, three spreader mast, oversized blocks, wenches. Bottom line is I am looking for a strong comfortable cruiser n the 48-52 foot range. Please post some pictures of the oversized wenches. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster Yatchs | Cruising | |||
Oyster Bay Open Raftup | Cruising | |||
Swan or Oyster? | ASA | |||
Oyster Rolex | ASA |