Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:06:18 -0600, Paul Cassel
wrote: Jiffy reefing but it seems that in a real blow, I have a very hard time of it. It's important to ease off the mainsheet and boom vang until the reefing lines are snugged down. Does the mainsail stick in the luff groove or do the slides stick? The really nice system that I saw on the 70 footer had full length battens with a roller bearing car on the inboard end of each batten. That sail dropped and stowed slicker than a venetian blind in reverse. |
#62
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:51:23 -0400, Gogarty
wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:41:41 GMT, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:08:09 -0400, Gogarty wrote: One could run the rode back to the primary winches but I don't think they would handle chain very well. The sailing battleships had a hemp rode something like four inches in diameter, They would attach a length of smaller stuff to the rode and lead that to the capstan. Casady They also had a crew of 400 men. In a 100 ft. vessel. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) You said Battle ship. I was wrong. The HMS Victory, which was a First Rate ship of the Line, is 186 ft. on the gun deck. Displaces 3,500 tones, has a draft of 28 feet. The officers and crew comprised approximately 850 personal. A broadside threw approximately 1,148 lbs. of iron. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
#63
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:24:15 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote: On Apr 15, 4:08 am, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: On my next boat I'm going to about 50 - 100 ft. of chain and a nylon rode. Actually the rope is stronger then the chain and you don't have to rig a snubber every night. You're in coral country aren't you? Coral sand erodes nylon and coral cuts it. My take on this is that in light winds when the chain is lying on the bottom you want the nylon well above the level of any bommies that might be around and still want enough scope out to be safe. I've been using 35m (~114') of 10mm (~3/8) chain and wouldn't go with much less. Indeed, I just replaced that with 150' of nominally 5/16 (actually 9mm) G43. Rigging a snubber is pretty easy work. -- Tom. Most places I anchor will be about 30 ft. (not taking the tide into consideration) with chain I normally use a scope of three. With nylon I'll probably start with five and see how that works. The first 50 - 100 ft will be chain which is laying on the bottom. Surprising I seldom find an anchorage with coral, usually it is clay mud with perhaps some shells. I think that the chain/rope rode will handle things but if not I still have the 200 ft. of chain in storage :-). Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
#64
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... My dock will be under about 10 ft. (not taking the tide into consideration) with dock lines I normally use a scope of three. With nylon I'll probably start with five and see how that works. The first 50 - used rolls of t.p. and beer cans will be laying on the bottom. Surprising I seldom find an anchorage with coral, usually it has some sort of pier with piles to tie to. I no longer do any serious cruising. I just got too old for it and my boat is to large and difficult to handle. I use it just as a floating home these days. I think that 3/8 rope dock line will handle things but if not I still have the 200 ft. of chain in storage. It's new since I haven't left this dock in about three or four years. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) Uh huh! Thought so. Thanks for the confirmation. Wilbur Hubbard |
#65
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
"Jeff Dowder" wrote in message
... On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:53:44 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: Jere... he doesn't actually sail and he certainly has never had to deal with an anchor/chain combo. Out trolling again I see. Just helping out. If I were trolling, I would make several nasty comments and try and stir up a fight. Is that what you're doing? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#66
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:06:18 -0600, Paul Cassel wrote: Jiffy reefing but it seems that in a real blow, I have a very hard time of it. It's important to ease off the mainsheet and boom vang until the reefing lines are snugged down. Does the mainsail stick in the luff groove or do the slides stick? The really nice system that I saw on the 70 footer had full length battens with a roller bearing car on the inboard end of each batten. That sail dropped and stowed slicker than a venetian blind in reverse. Basically the general fuss of such a large rig is what gives me fits. My next boat, if a sailboat, will have in mast or in boom furling. I almost installed in boom and actually ordered it but the mfg made some sort of measuring error. I just got disgusted waiting around in port for a part which was all wrong & left. Remember, I"m single handing. This would not be much of deal if not for that. |
#67
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
The answer ISN"T an electric or a bigger windlass
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:19:19 -0600, Paul Cassel
wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:06:18 -0600, Paul Cassel wrote: Jiffy reefing but it seems that in a real blow, I have a very hard time of it. It's important to ease off the mainsheet and boom vang until the reefing lines are snugged down. Does the mainsail stick in the luff groove or do the slides stick? The really nice system that I saw on the 70 footer had full length battens with a roller bearing car on the inboard end of each batten. That sail dropped and stowed slicker than a venetian blind in reverse. Basically the general fuss of such a large rig is what gives me fits. My next boat, if a sailboat, will have in mast or in boom furling. I almost installed in boom and actually ordered it but the mfg made some sort of measuring error. I just got disgusted waiting around in port for a part which was all wrong & left. Remember, I"m single handing. This would not be much of deal if not for that. I built a behind the mast system and while the foil certainly sags to leeward it is no more then a stay sail schooner, and the big advantage is that because it is so easy to use I end up with more sail in the wind for more hours a day. Before, when it was a matter of going forward and hauling in another reef at the mast, or shaking one out, I tended to wait -- probably gonna blow more later; or probably gonna be calm anyway, so I'd just leave things the way they were. With the roller it is just pull the blue line to make it bigger and the red one to make it smaller. It doesn't look as good as an in mast system but it works about as good. Wouldn't be without it. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The bigger the boat, the bigger the mess | General | |||
"Jeffrey Boyd" is an anagram of "Midget Runt" in Japanese | ASA | |||
Electric Windlass: How Important? | Cruising | |||
For Peggie: conversion of a Jabsco 37010 Series electric toilets to "Quiet - Flush" | Cruising |