Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:06:55 +0000, Larry wrote:
Red wrote in : Already covered that, Larry. Look up Gamma Ray bursts from imploding stars into black holes. It damages the ozone layer faster than anything our so-called scientists can come up with and takes approx 3 years to regenerage. Problem is, we get an average of one large burst a year and several small ones per week so it is an ongoing problem. No, no, we can't have that. We MUST blame only HUMANS for anything that happens so we can create a vast new empire of taxpayer-funded research for major univeristies all duplicating the same research, interminably, for decades and decades. We must also tie in the human blame factor to large corporations (read that DUPONT) so we can justify raising the price of something so simple as R-12 from 75c/pound to $9.50/12oz..."to save the environment". Some friends of mine sailed to the Caribbean a couple years ago. I'd done him a lot of favors, so he asked me if there was anything he could do for me. I told him to check the islands to see if any had any R-12 for the air conditioners in my old Mercedes cars, the ones with repairable compressors. He came back and called me to the boat. "I have a little present for you." I got 4 cases of R-12 he paid about $1/can for down there. IT WAS MADE THE YEAR BEFORE IN TENNESEE BUT NOT SOLD IN THE DAMNED USA! We're being screwed...... CBC has a documentary someone posted over on alt.binaries.multimedia.documentaries of great interest, too. The pesticide/chemical companies, like Monsanto, only a handful of them, now are into genetic engineering, creating SEED that responds to the chemicals ONLY. That sounds good, but they are SUING any farmers who DARE save their own seeds to replant in the spring AND GETTING AWAY WITH IT because these patented genes spread from farms away into this farmer's crop, creating new seeds with the patented genes in them....not his genes any more. And Americans think terrorists wear headgear and yell, "Allah Akbar!".... Not so... Larry R-12 is freely available in most 3rd world countries. Some of the newer stuff uses more "friendly" refrigerants but the old reliable stuff is still used for all the old bangers and the 10 year old air conditioners. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce in Bangkok wrote in
: R-12 is freely available in most 3rd world countries. Some of the newer stuff uses more "friendly" refrigerants but the old reliable stuff is still used for all the old bangers and the 10 year old air conditioners. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) America is probably the only place it's not available. It's all a money scam. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry wrote in news:Xns9A6EDC3B871B9noonehomecom@
208.49.80.253: Bruce in Bangkok wrote in : R-12 is freely available in most 3rd world countries. Some of the newer stuff uses more "friendly" refrigerants but the old reliable stuff is still used for all the old bangers and the 10 year old air conditioners. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) America is probably the only place it's not available. It's all a money scam. It's not a scam. R-12 is a very distructive CFC and the rest of the world signed on to the agreement not to sell/use it any more. Clearly they're in violation of the agreement. The fact that the US is doing something about the environment that's correct and proactive is relatively rare. The cheapest solution isn't always the best solution. I've been amazed at seeing R-12 and other banned CFCs on shelves in Central and South America that have been produced in the US. In my opinion, we should be going after these companies. There's no excuse for them to still be manufacturing it. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:57:01 -0500, Geoff Schultz
wrote: Larry wrote in news:Xns9A6EDC3B871B9noonehomecom@ 208.49.80.253: Bruce in Bangkok wrote in : R-12 is freely available in most 3rd world countries. Some of the newer stuff uses more "friendly" refrigerants but the old reliable stuff is still used for all the old bangers and the 10 year old air conditioners. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) America is probably the only place it's not available. It's all a money scam. It's not a scam. R-12 is a very distructive CFC and the rest of the world signed on to the agreement not to sell/use it any more. Clearly they're in violation of the agreement. The fact that the US is doing something about the environment that's correct and proactive is relatively rare. The cheapest solution isn't always the best solution. I've been amazed at seeing R-12 and other banned CFCs on shelves in Central and South America that have been produced in the US. In my opinion, we should be going after these companies. There's no excuse for them to still be manufacturing it. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org I have never looked but I'm sure that R-12 is not manufactured in Thailand, Cambodia, Malaysia or Indonesia where I have seen it used. I suspect that it is manufactured in one of the developed countries, because, or course, there is a market for it. Bruce-in-Bangkok (correct email address for reply) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce in Bangkok wrote in
: It's not a scam. R-12 is a very distructive CFC and the rest of the world signed on to the agreement not to sell/use it any more. Clearly they're in violation of the agreement. The fact that the US is doing something about the environment that's correct and proactive is relatively rare. The cheapest solution isn't always the best solution. But, Geoff, the "agreement", itself is a scam, based on false science. The excuse to cut us off from R-12 was that it was destroying the ozone layer, which is simply false. The SUN and cosmic rays are destroying the ozone layer, as they have done for millions and millions of years. All this nonsense of human gasses destroying the Earth assumes the Earth is in some kind of sealed bubble, which it is not. For its entire history, the Earth has been destroyed several times over by awful gasses that came from without and within, long, long before man evolved (or for 6000 years if you are a devout Christian). Where did it all go? The ecosystem is NOT an enclosed bubble and is replenished by massive tons of solar ejecta every day, the solar wind, as it has all this time, man or no man, propaganda or no propaganda. Hell, we'd have choked to death from the Industrial Revolution a hundred years ago if we'd been in a bubble....just from English factory smoke stacks. Man gives himself way too much credit for his power over nature. Man can't seem to grasp how small and insignificant he really is, even with his machines. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:54:03 +0000, Larry wrote:
damn you!!! now I'm going to have to install a _new_ bull**** detector...again... |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry wrote in
: Bruce in Bangkok wrote in : It's not a scam. R-12 is a very distructive CFC and the rest of the world signed on to the agreement not to sell/use it any more. Clearly they're in violation of the agreement. The fact that the US is doing something about the environment that's correct and proactive is relatively rare. The cheapest solution isn't always the best solution. But, Geoff, the "agreement", itself is a scam, based on false science. The excuse to cut us off from R-12 was that it was destroying the ozone layer, which is simply false. The SUN and cosmic rays are destroying the ozone layer, as they have done for millions and millions of years. So your argument is that CFCs such as R-12 don't interact with the ozone layer and hasten its demise? I would say that there's a lot of well established science that would argue with you. -- Geoff www.GeoffSchultz.org |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff Schultz wrote in
: So your argument is that CFCs such as R-12 don't interact with the ozone layer and hasten its demise? I would say that there's a lot of well established science that would argue with you. America has gotten rid of R-12 for many many years. The ozone hole is bigger. I'm not saying that R-12 isn't a terrible chemical capable of destroying ozone in the laboratory, where, of course at great expense, all these facts fester. What I'm OBSERVING is that the effect of dragging America, at 10 to 15 times the price, into R-134a has been....well......ZERO, just like most other programs designed to separate the American consumer from his wealth by the corporate government bureaucrats. The size of the ozone hole hasn't done what we were told it would do BECAUSE the 6.2oz of R-12 in my 1973 Mercedes 220D's air conditioner caused it. It didn't. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How many amps to start this unit? | Cruising | |||
How many amps to start this unit? | Electronics | |||
Circuit Breaker Trip Amps | Electronics | |||
Amps draw per horsepower | Electronics | |||
Amps drawn per H.P. | Electronics |